The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 893 条经验证的评价后,Kwentra 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #68 1 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #50 3 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #29 3 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #52 3 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #49 3 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #58 1 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #66 0 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and profitability. Both Kwentra and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations but approach it differently; Kwentra blends legacy systems with cloud solutions, while Mews offers a fully cloud-native platform with extensive integrations. As your decision nears, consider how recent reviews and user feedback substantiate their strengths.
Kwentra’s near-perfect ratings are based on only six reviews, with the last being over a year ago, which limits current data. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones in the past six months, making it the more reliable choice today. Do you prioritize a system with sustained user confidence and ongoing innovation?
Both Kwentra and Mews address core hotel management needs: reservations, billing, guest communication, and reporting. Kwentra’s ecosystem combines traditional legacy strengths with cloud flexibility, appealing to hotels seeking a hybrid approach that retains familiar features. Mews, however, focuses entirely on cloud-native solutions, emphasizing automation, real-time data, and extensive third-party integrations.
Kwentra’s standout feature is on-premise deployment, which can be critical for hotels with strict data policies or limited internet access. Mews, on the other hand, offers a modern, mobile-friendly interface praised for quick adoption and remote management. Which approach aligns better with your operational priorities?
If your hotel needs a traditional, hybrid system with a strong legacy backbone, Kwentra’s ecosystem might be suitable—especially for properties in regions where on-premise deployment remains important. Its high ease of use (4.83/5) and outstanding support rating (4.83/5) suggest a stable, well-supported platform, particularly for properties managing complex, multi-system environments.
If your hotel prioritizes scalability, automation, and global connectivity, Mews is the clear choice. Its superior review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive marketplace of over 1,000 integrations make it ideal for hotels seeking flexibility, innovation, and a future-proof system. For hotels ready to leverage the latest in cloud tech, Mews outperforms Kwentra on every metric.
Kwentra’s user ratings (4.83/5) and onboarding scores (4.75/5) indicate a highly intuitive platform, with users praising the helpful support team and straightforward setup. Its interface, though less modern than Mews, remains familiar to hotels with legacy systems, easing staff adoption.
Mews receives similarly high ratings (4.7/5), with users emphasizing its modern, clean design and ease of use across devices. Recent reviews highlight Mews’ quick onboarding, with some mentioning that initial setup can be a bit complex but is ultimately manageable due to responsive support.
Edge: Kwentra.
Kwentra offers 46 shared features plus one exclusive in-house feature, and it uniquely provides on-premise deployment. Its features include reservation management, billing, reports, and some finance integrations—fitting for properties needing a hybrid system.
Mews surpasses in feature count, offering 46 shared features plus 13 unique ones like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, native email marketing, guest app, and housekeeper mobile app. Its focus on automation and guest interaction tools makes it more adaptable for modern hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Kwentra’s reviews (4.83/5) praise its responsive, helpful team, with comments like “The Cloudinn Team is very helpful,” and “Quick response times.” Its support seems tailored to properties that favor a more personalized, high-touch approach.
Mews’ support (4.27/5) is generally good but has mixed recent reviews. Some users note occasional bugs and support delays; however, the team’s rapid issue resolution and proactive updates are appreciated. Still, Kwentra’s support ratings are slightly higher, reflecting consistent, high-quality service.
Edge: Kwentra.
Mews offers a far broader ecosystem with 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like SiteMinder, Onity, and Sage, plus a marketplace of over 1,000 third-party solutions. Its open API and extensive ecosystem provide significant flexibility for hotel customization.
Kwentra has 18 verified partners, including key players like Expedia and Hotel Data Cloud but fewer options overall. Its integrations are sufficient for properties with limited third-party needs but less suited for complex or rapidly evolving tech stacks.
Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a higher overall rating (4.62/5) with over 750 reviews, including 98 recent ones, indicating current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments like boutique, independent, and branded properties consistently rate Mews highly, especially for ease of use and support.
Kwentra’s reviews, though perfectly positive (5/5), are limited in number and outdated, making it less reliable for current judgment. Hotels that value ongoing innovation and recent user feedback will favor Mews’ higher ratings.
Edge: Mews.
Kwentra does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a free trial or freemium model, which may impact smaller properties or those testing systems.
Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no free trial or implementation fee. Its transparent pricing and flexible packages make it easier to evaluate ROI upfront, especially for mid-sized and larger hotels.
Not ideal if you need rapid scalability or extensive third-party integrations, as Kwentra’s ecosystem is smaller.
Not recommended if your hotel requires on-premise deployment or has very limited internet access, as Mews is fully cloud-based.
Mews offers a modern, cloud-native PMS with a large ecosystem, extensive integrations, and a proven track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews. It’s ideal for properties that want to future-proof their operations, enhance guest experiences, and scale easily.
Kwentra remains a solid option for hotels needing a hybrid legacy-cloud system with on-premise deployment, high support levels, and a niche in traditional environments. However, its limited recent feedback makes it less attractive for properties seeking ongoing innovation.
If your hotel values comprehensive features, a robust third-party marketplace, and recent positive feedback, Mews is the clear choice. For hotels that need a hybrid system with high-touch support and regional deployment, Kwentra might still be suitable—but only if you’re comfortable with less current data.
In conclusion, given the volume of recent reviews and the breadth of features, Mews is the stronger option for most modern hotels looking to grow and innovate.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。kwentra 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。kwentra 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
kwentra:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Kwentra 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问