The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 File Library Support (images, documents and videos) and Automated Replies.
Lodgistics 表现出色 在 沟通与协作 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Inspection and Deep cleaning.
基于 HTR 上 100 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,100/mo | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 16 | 84 |
在分析了 100 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 ,而 Lodgistics 用户则强调 沟通与协作, 维护和工作订单, 培训和易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
沟通与协作
▾
|
|
|
+
维护和工作订单
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
定制与集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
性能问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 员工协作工具 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 7 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 5 条评价 | #5 77 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #13 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 5 条评价 | #7 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #15 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #25 1 条评价 | #6 74 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 8 条评价 | #6 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #5 81 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 15 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | — | #19 0 条评价 |
Choosing between LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) and Lodgistics hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities and team needs. Both products aim to streamline staff collaboration, but they approach this goal differently—LIKE MAGIC offers an all-in-one guest-centric platform, while Lodgistics specializes in detailed task and maintenance management.
Your team needs a solution that fits your hotel's size, segment, and existing tech stack. Do you prioritize a comprehensive guest experience platform or a robust operations management tool?
LIKE MAGIC and Lodgistics serve distinct hotel operation needs, making their suitability vary by your hotel's size and focus. LIKE MAGIC’s core strength lies in automating the entire guest journey, from booking to post-stay, with deep integrations into PMS and access systems, and boasts a high review count (16 reviews) with recent feedback. Lodgistics, with 71 reviews and a focus on internal communication, maintenance, and task management, is more established in the hotel operations space.
While LIKE MAGIC is praised for its automation, integration, and guest engagement features, Lodgistics shines in facilitating internal communication, work order tracking, and preventive maintenance. Do you need a platform to elevate guest experiences, or one to refine your back-of-house operations?
If your hotel needs a digital platform that automates the guest journey and reduces administrative burdens, go with LIKE MAGIC. Its high overall rating (0/5) is less relevant compared to its 99% likelihood to recommend and recent reviews highlighting operational efficiency, especially for extended stays and boutique hotels.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires detailed staff collaboration, maintenance workflows, and internal communication, Lodgistics offers a more proven track record (75.66/100 HTR score) with extensive features like work order management, preventive maintenance, and quality assurance, favored by larger branded hotels.
In summary, choose LIKE MAGIC if guest experience automation is your priority. Opt for Lodgistics if operational control and staff collaboration are more critical.
LIKE MAGIC has a near-perfect ease of use rating (5/5, based on limited but recent reviews), with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Its recent reviews also indicate a smooth adoption process and high staff engagement, making it ideal for hotels wanting minimal training.
Lodgistics has a slightly lower but still strong rating (4.75/5), with users appreciating its straightforward navigation and ease of managing maintenance and communication. However, some feedback points to occasional slow performance and minor bugs, potentially affecting staff productivity.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC offers 4 features exclusive to it, including File Library Support, Automated Replies, Message Templates, and an Open API, all enhancing communication and integration flexibility. Lodgistics provides 10 unique features, like Inspection, Deep Cleaning, Preventative Maintenance, Asset Tracking, and Meter Reading, tailored to operations and maintenance.
Lodgistics’s extensive feature set makes it suitable for hotels prioritizing internal task management and quality assurance. LIKE MAGIC’s features focus on guest engagement, digital check-ins, and seamless integrations.
Edge: Lodgistics.
LIKE MAGIC scores a 4.88/5 for customer support, with recent reviews emphasizing quick responses and helpful onboarding. Users mention that LIKE MAGIC’s support team is responsive and proactive, making implementation smoother.
Lodgistics also earns a 4.88/5, with users praising its prompt assistance, though some note occasional support delays. Both excel in support quality, but LIKE MAGIC’s more recent reviews and higher user ratings reinforce its leadership here.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, offering extensive connections to PMS, access, and payment systems. Lodgistics connects with only 2 verified partners, sharing Oracle Hospitality, limiting its integration ecosystem.
If seamless connectivity with multiple systems is vital, LIKE MAGIC provides a broader and more flexible integration landscape. Lodgistics’s fewer integrations may restrict its utility in hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Lodgistics has an overall high rating of 4.82/5 from 71 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, communication improvements, and maintenance management. It is favored by branded hotels (average rating 4.7/5 from 8 reviews) across North America.
LIKE MAGIC, with only 16 reviews but a perfect 5/5 rating, is valued for its innovative automation and guest experience enhancements, especially among boutique and extended-stay hotels. Its recent reviews are scarce but highly positive.
Edge: Lodgistics.
LIKE MAGIC’s pricing starts at $1,100 per month, with no freemium or trial options, positioning it as a premium investment. Lodgistics charges $200 per month, with no mention of trial periods, making it more budget-friendly.
Your choice depends on your budget and the scope of features needed. LIKE MAGIC offers extensive automation and integrations at a higher price point, while Lodgistics provides essential operational tools more affordably.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes internal maintenance or has a small operation with minimal guest-facing technology needs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive guest engagement tools or automated guest experience platforms.
Lodgistics and LIKE MAGIC target different hotel operation facets. Lodgistics excels in internal staff communication, maintenance, and task management, making it suitable for hotels seeking detailed operational oversight. LIKE MAGIC offers a broader guest-focused platform, automating the entire guest journey and integrating with PMS and access systems.
Choose LIKE MAGIC if your hotel seeks to elevate guest experiences, automate workflows, and integrate deeply with existing tech. If your primary goal is to improve staff collaboration, maintenance workflows, and internal communication, Lodgistics is the better choice—especially given its higher overall reviews and established presence.
In conclusion, for hotels that value automation, guest engagement, and broad integrations, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger pick with recent, high-volume reviews supporting its effectiveness. For those prioritizing internal operations, maintenance, and staff communication, Lodgistics offers a proven, highly-rated solution.
员工协作工具 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Lodgistics 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 应用内翻译 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 文件库支持(图像、文档和视频) | ||
| 服务恢复/升级 | ||
| 检查 | ||
| 消息模板 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 深层清洁 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
| 预防性维护模块 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
大多数用户都对 Lodgistics 大加赞赏,因为它大大改善了各部门之间的内部沟通和协作。它可以帮助员工随时了解任务和问题,无论他们身处何地或轮班,从而提高运营... 大多数用户都对 Lodgistics 大加赞赏,因为它大大改善了各部门之间的内部沟通和协作。它可以帮助员工随时了解任务和问题,无论他们身处何地或轮班,从而提高运营效率和客户满意度。
Lodgistics 管理和跟踪工作订单的能力备受赞赏。用户发现提交、跟踪和完成维护任务非常容易,这有助于保持酒店的最佳状态,并减少错过或延迟维修的可能性。
许多用户强调,Lodgistics 直观易用,减少了员工培训所需的时间。这确保了各部门的快速采用,并提高了整体运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了小错误、性能缓慢和偶尔的系统故障。虽然这些问题对大多数人来说并不是什么大问题,但它们确实偶尔会带来不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 和 Lodgistics 共享许多核心 Staff Collaboration Tools 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgistics 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LIKE MAGIC (Staff App):否。Lodgistics:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Staff Collaboration Tools 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 0,Lodgistics 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问