The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between LMPM by LMPM and Sirvoy hinges on your property’s specific needs and how each platform addresses those needs. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but their capabilities, user feedback, and market presence differ markedly. LMPM’s near-total absence of reviews and features suggests it’s an untested, limited option, while Sirvoy’s extensive, recent reviews demonstrate its reliability and proven performance.
Given the stark contrast in user feedback and product maturity, your decision should lean toward Sirvoy if you prioritize proven usability, support, and feature depth. Do you want a platform with a track record and vibrant user community? Or are you considering an unproven system with limited data? The choice is clear.
LMPM is marketed as a property management system tailored for vacation rental managers, promising automation and centralized operations. Yet, with no reviews or ratings available, it remains an unverified solution, leaving your team uncertain about its real-world performance.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, boasts 95 reviews, a high NPS score of 9.41, and a 4.85/5 customer support rating—making it a well-supported choice. Its ease of use (4.64/5) and recent positive feedback suggest a stable, user-friendly system that small to medium-sized hotels can depend on daily.
Do you want to gamble on an unreviewed product, or prefer a platform with recent, robust validation? The evidence favors Sirvoy for hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a trustworthy, feature-rich PMS that enhances guest management and channel connectivity, Sirvoy is the clear pick. Its comprehensive feature set, including booking engine, channel management, guest messaging, and online check-in, supports an intuitive hotel experience.
LMPM’s limited feature set and zero reviews suggest it might not meet the needs of hotels requiring reliable, tested tools. If your focus is on a proven system with extensive integrations and support, Sirvoy’s 21 verified partners and recent positive feedback make it the superior choice.
For small hotels seeking ease of use and broad functionality, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the preferable option. LMPM’s lack of validation is a significant drawback.
LMPM, with no reviews, offers no insights into its user interface or onboarding process, leaving your team uncertain about the software’s usability. Conversely, Sirvoy scores 4.64/5 in ease of use, supported by detailed reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward setup.
Reviewers highlight that Sirvoy’s simple interface allows new staff to learn quickly, with support staff providing helpful onboarding assistance. Its mobile-friendly features and responsive customer service reinforce its usability.
Edge: Sirvoy.
LMPM offers no features documented in the data, indicating a potentially sparse or undeveloped platform. Conversely, Sirvoy provides 43 features, such as multi-lingual support, direct billing, guest messaging, a booking engine, channel management, online check-in, and integrated payment processing.
Sirvoy’s feature depth ensures your hotel can handle reservations, guest communications, and multi-channel distribution from a single platform. LMPM’s lack of feature data makes it unlikely to match Sirvoy’s comprehensive suite.
Edge: Sirvoy.
LMPM’s support ratings are nonexistent, implying no validated customer service experience. Sirvoy, with a 4.85/5 support score based on 95 reviews, is highly praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness.
Review quotes emphasize quick, clear assistance, with users describing support as “excellent” and “the best support I have ever encountered.” This track record suggests your team will feel confident relying on Sirvoy when issues arise.
Edge: Sirvoy.
LMPM, with zero verified integrations, appears to lack third-party connections, limiting its ability to adapt to your existing tools. Sirvoy offers 21 verified partners, including major booking channels (Booking.com, Expedia), payment providers, and marketing platforms like TrustYou and SiteMinder.
These integrations streamline operations and expand your reach. The breadth of Sirvoy’s integrations makes it more flexible and scalable as your hotel grows.
Edge: Sirvoy.
LMPM’s review count of zero makes rating impossible. Meanwhile, Sirvoy has 95 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting high satisfaction, especially among small and boutique hotels.
Most recent reviews praise its ease of use, support, and value, with some describing it as “super easy to use” and “affordable.” Its current user ratings confirm Sirvoy’s position as a trusted, highly-rated platform.
Edge: Sirvoy.
LMPM’s pricing details are unavailable, and it explicitly does not offer a trial—raising questions about affordability and transparency. Sirvoy charges $200 per month, with a 30-day trial, providing a clear, predictable cost structure.
This pricing model makes budgeting easier and allows for evaluation before commitment. The transparency and affordability of Sirvoy’s pricing are advantageous for small to medium-sized hotels.
LMPM’s sparse data and lack of reviews suggest it’s best avoided unless you’re willing to take a risk on an untested product.
Sirvoy’s extensive user base and positive reviews make it suitable for properties prioritizing simplicity and support.
At its core, Sirvoy offers a complete, user-friendly property management system backed by recent, positive reviews and a high support score. LMPM remains an unproven, feature-sparse platform with no validation, making it risky for hotels that rely on stable, tested solutions.
Choose Sirvoy if you want a platform with proven usability, comprehensive features, and strong support. LMPM might appeal if you’re exploring options, but its lack of reviews and features makes it unadvisable for your hotel’s core operations.
If your hotel values reliability and a broad feature set, Sirvoy is the clear choice. If you’re comfortable with uncertainty and minimal validation, LMPM could be considered—but it’s not recommended.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LMPM 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。LMPM 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LMPM:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LMPM 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问