The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,LMPM 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| LMPM |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | LMPM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between LMPM by LMPM and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and user feedback. Do you prioritize a system with a proven track record and extensive integrations, or a niche solution tailored for vacation rentals with automation focus?
LMPM is a largely unreviewed system, offering minimal data and no recent feedback to support its claims, whereas Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews with a near-perfect rating. Given this, which platform provides the confidence and features your hotel needs to thrive today?
LMPM appears to be a property management system designed for vacation rentals, promising automation and real-time insights. However, with zero recent reviews and no rating available, there’s no clear evidence of its performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62 out of 5 rating based on 758 reviews, with nearly 100 in the last six months alone—indicating ongoing development and strong user confidence.
While LMPM may claim to simplify operations, the absence of user feedback raises questions about its reliability and feature completeness. Mews, on the other hand, is a recognized leader in the space, especially for hotels seeking a robust, cloud-based platform. Is a vendor with proven reviews and active user engagement the safer choice for your hotel’s future?
If your hotel needs a flexible, well-supported PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace and proven track record make it suitable for a range of property types, from boutique to large-scale operations. If you have very specific, niche needs for vacation rentals and prefer a system tailored solely for that segment, LMPM might seem appealing—though the lack of recent user feedback makes this a risky proposition.
For hotels prioritizing reliable support, continuous innovation, and proven scalability, Mews is the clear leader. LMPM’s limited data and unverified claims make it difficult to recommend confidently, especially when choosing a critical system that impacts daily operations and guest experiences.
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, based on more than 750 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Reviews for LMPM provide no recent data or ratings, leaving its usability unverified and potentially unreliable.
Given the overwhelming user feedback, Mews’ user interface is modern, straightforward, and adaptable to staff needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated reminders, task management, real-time reporting, and extensive payment options. LMPM, by contrast, lists no features or integrations, leaving its functional scope entirely unknown.
Mews’ feature depth and active development cycle provide hotels with tools to optimize operations and guest engagement. Without verified features, LMPM cannot compete. Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.27 out of 5 rating for customer support, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users note that support is generally prompt, with issues resolved swiftly, despite occasional bugs.
LMPM’s support quality cannot be assessed as there are no recent reviews or ratings available. Given Mews’ active support ecosystem and positive feedback, it is the safer option. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, offering extensive flexibility. LMPM has zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and scalability.
This broad ecosystem allows hoteliers to customize workflows, automate processes, and connect with third-party solutions effortlessly. Without integrations, LMPM’s utility is severely limited. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews are 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.12/5. Hoteliers across segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
LMPM’s lack of reviews and ratings means no data exists on user satisfaction. The recent, extensive feedback for Mews underscores its value and reliability. Edge: Mews.
LMPM does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or undocumented fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fee, but it’s a fixed fee typical for enterprise-grade PMS.
While Mews’s cost might seem higher, the value comes from its features, integrations, support, and proven track record. The opacity of LMPM’s pricing makes it difficult to evaluate its value proposition.
Given the lack of recent review data, LMPM is better suited for very small, uncomplicated setups where risk tolerance is high.
Mews supports a diverse range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with proven success in streamlining operations and enhancing guest experiences.
Mews stands out as a mature, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with a large, active user base. Its extensive integrations, positive recent reviews, and proven track record make it the safer choice for hotels looking to modernize and grow.
LMPM’s limited data, unverified claims, and absence of recent reviews place it at a significant disadvantage. Unless your property operates in a highly niche market with minimal integration needs, Mews is the recommended platform to support your hotel’s future.
In conclusion, if confidence, functionality, and ongoing support are priorities, go with Mews. It offers the reliability and tools your hotel needs to succeed in today’s competitive landscape.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LMPM 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。LMPM 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LMPM:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LMPM 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问