The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Lodging System 表现出色 .
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 887 |
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Lodging System 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
Lodging System
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
Lodging System
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
Lodging System
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
Lodging System
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Lodging System by Lodging System and Mews PMS are two options that aim to streamline your hotel operations. While Lodging System claims a comprehensive set of tools, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and scalability. Given the data, which one is truly better suited for your hotel’s needs?
Lodging System offers an all-in-one platform with integrated CRM, POS, and channel management, claiming to provide a suite of tools to manage all hotel operations from one interface. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-native system with over 336 verified integrations, focusing on automation, real-time data, and advancing guest experiences. The main divergence is that Lodging System lacks an extensive integration ecosystem and regional presence, whereas Mews operates globally with a large user base.
Both products aim to reduce manual work and improve revenue, but Mews’s extensive reviews—over 758 in the last six months—show a high level of satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Lodging System, with no recent reviews or ratings, appears less proven in today’s competitive landscape. Are you prepared to rely on a product with no recent feedback versus a system with proven, recent user success?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform that includes POS, CRM, and central reservation features, Lodging System might seem appealing. However, without verified recent reviews or an established reputation, caution is advised. If scalability, automation, extensive integrations, and modern guest-centric features are your priorities, Mews is the clear choice, especially for hotels seeking a flexible system that supports growth and innovation.
For boutique hotels, hostels, and small properties looking for a modern, user-friendly platform, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating and recent reviews make it a safer, more reliable investment. Meanwhile, Lodging System’s lack of recent ratings and zero verified reviews suggest it hasn't demonstrated the same level of ongoing customer satisfaction.
Mews’s ease of use is rated at 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and fast staff adoption. Reviewers highlight how staff can log in remotely, manage reservations, and handle tasks efficiently, often with simple training. In contrast, Lodging System has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness or onboarding experience.
Given Mews’s high scores and recent positive feedback, it’s evident that your team will find it easier to adopt and operate. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, and a mobile app. Lodging System, by comparison, claims to provide a property management system, booking engine, and central reservation service but does not specify additional features or integrations, and no verified feature count exists.
With a rich ecosystem of features and over 336 verified integrations, Mews provides more tools to enhance operations and guest experience. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings stand at 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance, especially during onboarding. Users note that support issues are typically resolved quickly, with some mentioning that support teams deliver consistent help.
Lodging System offers no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its customer support quality. Given Mews’s proven support track record, it’s the safer choice for hotel teams that value reliable, responsive service. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, connecting with channel managers, CRS, payment systems, and other tech via its extensive marketplace. Shared integrations are zero, but Mews’s broad ecosystem enables tailored, scalable tech stacks. Lodging System, with no verified partners or integrations, limits flexibility and future growth possibilities.
For hotels seeking a flexible, connected system that can grow with their needs, Mews’s integration ecosystem is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Lodging System has no recent reviews or ratings, which indicates a lack of current user feedback or widespread adoption. Mews, with over 679 reviews in the last 6 months and a 4.62/5 rating, is highly rated across various hotel segments—including boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties.
Recent reviews consistently praise Mews’s ease of use, automation, and support, making it the preferred choice among hoteliers today. Edge: Mews.
Lodging System does not publicly disclose pricing, implying possible bespoke quotes or less transparent pricing models. Mews charges a base fee of $900, with no implementation or monthly per-room charges, making its costs straightforward and predictable.
For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking clear pricing, Mews offers transparency. Lodging System’s undisclosed costs make budgeting and comparison difficult. Based on transparency and value, Mews is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel desires modern automation, scalable integrations, or a user-friendly interface.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a traditional, less tech-intensive system or has highly specialized, non-standard operational needs.
The core difference lies in proven, recent user satisfaction versus an untested offering. Mews’s extensive reviews, high ratings, and global presence make it the more reliable, feature-rich, and scalable platform to support modern hotel operations. Lodging System's lack of recent data and verified customer feedback suggest it’s a less proven option in today’s competitive landscape.
Choose Mews if you value automation, integrations, support, and a future-proof platform that can grow with your hotel. Lodging System might appeal for basic needs, but without recent data, its suitability is uncertain. If your priority is minimizing risk and maximizing performance, Mews is the clear choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
Lodging System
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Lodging System 和 Mews PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
Lodging System
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
Lodging System
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Lodging System
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Lodging System
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Lodging System 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lodging System 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lodging System:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Lodging System 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问