The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 37 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Slope 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 37 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 37 |
在分析了 37 条经验证的评价后,Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 用户最看重其 ,而 Slope 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 通知和数据集成, 客房管理和客房清洁。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
通知和数据集成
▾
|
|
|
+
客房管理和客房清洁
▾
|
|
|
+
在线预订集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
图形改进
▾
|
|
|
−
估算计算器模块
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #35 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #75 0 条评价 | #30 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #33 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #79 0 条评价 | #41 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #69 0 条评价 | #35 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #53 0 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #59 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #56 0 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
Choosing between Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware and Slope hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but Lodgit offers a more traditional, desktop-based system, whereas Slope provides a cloud-centric, feature-rich platform. Your decision should consider ease of use, feature set, support, and cost, especially given the recent review activity.
Lodgit’s limited recent reviews and zero overall ratings suggest it’s less tested in current hotel operations. Conversely, Slope’s high review count (35 reviews in the last six months) and excellent recent ratings make it a clearer choice for hotels seeking modern, well-supported technology. Which software aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Lodgit Desk targets smaller hotels, guesthouses, and holiday rentals with a simple, familiar interface that mimics a traditional reservation book. It’s designed for straightforward reservation management and basic communication, making it most suitable for boutique or small-scale properties that prefer a locally hosted system. Slope, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform with 34 unique features, including CRM, marketing, and revenue management, ideal for hotels looking to scale or automate multiple departments.
While Lodgit offers core functions like invoicing and multi-property management, its lack of recent updates and user reviews make it less adaptable for dynamic, modern operations. Slope’s extensive feature set, on the other hand, supports complex workflows across various hotel types, from independent boutique hotels to large hotel groups. Do you need a simple, traditional PMS, or a comprehensive management system?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cost-effective solution for managing reservations and guest correspondence, Lodgit is a viable choice—especially if you operate a small property or prefer a desktop-based system. However, with no recent reviews or updates, it lacks the recent user validation that modern hotels rely on. Slope is the better choice if your hotel requires a broad array of features like online booking, channel management, and revenue tools, and if you value cloud access and regular updates.
For hotels prioritizing ease of onboarding, user-friendly interfaces, and ongoing support, Slope’s high rating (77.81) and recent feedback from 35 reviews provide confidence. Lodgit’s minimal recent feedback, with zero reviews, indicates it’s less proven in today’s competitive landscape. When in doubt, lean toward Slope’s proven track record and feature richness for growth-oriented hotels.
Lodgit Desk’s interface resembles a traditional reservation book, offering familiarity for users used to paper-based systems. However, its zero recent reviews and lack of user feedback make it difficult to assess current usability, and its older design may feel outdated. Slope’s platform scores nearly 5/5 (4.94/5) in ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface that reduces training time.
Slope’s cloud-based design allows staff to access information from anywhere, improving flexibility. Its recent positive reviews highlight rapid onboarding, simple navigation, and minimal learning curve, especially for teams familiar with digital tools. Edge: Slope.
Lodgit offers 15 shared features plus 2 exclusive functions—on-premise deployment and ancillary revenue tracking—focusing on core reservation management. Meanwhile, Slope provides 34 unique features, including transactional emails, online check-in, guest messaging, automated reminders, and integrated payment solutions, covering a broader range of hotel operations.
Slope’s additional features support revenue management, staff task management, real-time status updates, and guest engagement, offering a more comprehensive operational toolkit. Lodgit’s features are limited and primarily suited for basic reservation workflows. For hotels seeking an all-in-one operational platform, Slope’s feature count gives it a clear edge.
Lodgit’s customer support rating is unavailable, and its review volume is nonexistent, suggesting limited recent support feedback. Slope, however, scores 4.97/5 based on recent reviews, with hoteliers describing its support as "incredibly quick" and "friendly and efficient." Review quotes reinforce this, with users emphasizing prompt responses and helpful guidance.
Slope’s onboarding process is rated 4.94/5, indicating a smooth implementation experience. The high support score and recent positive feedback make Slope a safer choice for hoteliers who rely on dependable assistance. Edge: Slope.
Lodgit offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external tools or channels. Slope features 11 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Guestnet, Lybra Tech, and Ai Kosmo, enabling seamless integration with booking channels, payment providers, and marketing tools.
Its integrations support multi-channel distribution, electronic invoicing, and guest management, reducing manual work and errors. For hotels seeking connectivity and automation, Slope’s ecosystem provides a significant advantage. Edge: Slope.
Lodgit’s reviews are virtually nonexistent, with no recent feedback or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Slope, on the other hand, boasts an overall rating of 77.81, with 35 recent reviews, and a 99% likelihood of recommendation. Hotels of various sizes, especially boutique and city-center properties, rate Slope highly for ease of use, support, and feature set.
Recent reviews highlight satisfaction with its intuitive interface and fast support, indicating high user confidence. Given the limited feedback on Lodgit, Slope’s superior and more recent ratings give it a clear lead.
Lodgit’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting a custom or on-premise fee structure without a free trial. Slope charges $600/month, with no freemium option, but offers a 30-day trial, allowing hotel teams to evaluate the platform before committing.
While Lodgit’s cost structure is unclear, Slope’s transparent monthly fee and trial period provide better predictability and value. For hotels wanting clear pricing and the ability to test features first, Slope is the more transparent option.
Lodgit suits properties with minimal operational complexity, especially in regions comfortable with local software. It’s less suitable for hotels looking for modern, scalable solutions.
Slope supports hotels that want a flexible, feature-rich platform capable of growth and operational automation.
In essence, Lodgit offers a simple, traditional PMS suitable for small properties comfortable with desktop solutions. Its limited recent reviews and narrow feature set make it less appealing for modern, growth-oriented hotels. Slope, with its extensive feature array, recent positive feedback, and cloud-based flexibility, stands out as the smarter choice for most hotels today.
If your hotel values ease of use, support, and broad functionality, Slope provides the proven track record and integrated tools that evolving hotels need. Lodgit may still serve small, static operations, but for dynamic, scalable management, Slope clearly leads the pack.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 和 Slope 共享 15 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154.... Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154. This eases operations and reduces stress during peak periods.
正如评论 76207 中指出的,通过 SDI 通知导入客人登记数据和拒绝发票等自动化功能可提高运营效率。
模块有助于房间和任务的安排、简化客房服务任务和房间清洁组织,详见评论 76189。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
建议的改进包括升级预订引擎图形(在评论 76199 中提到),以提升用户体验。
一些用户(例如评论 76189 中的用户)提到需要更新估算计算器模块,表明它与其他软件元素相比落后。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 和 Slope 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Slope 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Slope 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware:否。Slope:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 的 HT Score 为 0,Slope 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问