The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 887 |
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #75 0 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #79 0 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #69 0 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #53 0 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #56 0 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's success, especially when balancing ease of use, features, support, and cost. Lodgit Desk offers a simple, cost-effective solution tailored for smaller properties and multi-property management, but it’s limited in scale and lacks recent reviews or high ratings. In contrast, Mews, with over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, has established itself as a leading cloud-based PMS that caters to a broad spectrum of hotel types globally. Which system aligns more with your hotel’s growth ambitions and operational needs?
Both Lodgit and Mews aim to streamline accommodation management, but they diverge significantly in scope and user feedback. Lodgit provides basic reservation and invoicing tools, primarily suited for small hotels and hostels seeking affordability and simplicity, without the need for extensive integrations or cloud features. Meanwhile, Mews offers a comprehensive, modern, cloud-based platform that covers reservations, billing, guest communications, revenue management, and over 336 integrations—making it more versatile for hotels seeking growth and technological expansion. Do you need a straightforward tool or a full-scale operational platform?
If your hotel requires a highly reliable, scalable system with extensive third-party integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its current review count of 758 and recent feedback from hotels, including boutique properties and large chains, demonstrate its maturity and broad acceptance. Conversely, Lodgit may suit smaller properties with tight budgets that prioritize basic reservation management over advanced features and integrations. For hotels planning to scale or modernize, Mews’s advanced capabilities and recent, positive reviews make it the more future-proof investment. Which profile better fits your hotel’s trajectory?
Lodgit’s interface mimics traditional reservation books but lacks recent user feedback, leaving its usability somewhat unverified. Mews, however, boasts a 4.7/5 ease of use rating based on nearly 100 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, modern interface, and straightforward onboarding process. Support and onboarding ratings also favor Mews, with a 4.27/5 score and comments highlighting a smooth setup and responsive support team. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit’s feature set is limited, focusing on basic reservation management, offers, and invoicing—lacking advanced tools like guest CRM, revenue management, or mobile apps. Mews, with 43 exclusive features, includes multi-lingual and multi-currency support, online check-in, automated night audits, guest messaging, and a marketplace with over 1,000 third-party integrations. It’s clearly more equipped for complex, multi-property, or tech-savvy hotels. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit offers support ratings absent from recent reviews, suggesting limited recent customer feedback. Mews, rated at 4.27/5, has garnered praise for its responsive, 24/7 support and proactive onboarding, with reviews stating, “The support team sets new standards.” Its extensive support infrastructure and positive recent feedback give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit lacks current reviews, making comparison impossible. Mews, with a 4.62/5 rating from 758 recent reviews, is highly rated across hotel segments, from boutique properties to large chains, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers consistently praise Mews for its reliability, ease, and scalability. Its recent, substantial review volume confirms its standing as a trusted choice. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit does not publicly list pricing, indicating it might be tailored or modestly priced for small properties. Mews charges a starting fee of $900/month, with no implementation or ongoing fees disclosed, but its high feature density and large integration ecosystem justify its value for hotels seeking growth. Given Mews’s clear pricing and extensive features, it offers transparency and predictable costs for expanding hotels.
Mews and Lodgit cater to different hotel profiles, with Mews emerging as the more comprehensive, well-reviewed choice. Lodgit offers a budget-friendly, straightforward system suitable for small properties with limited needs, but it lacks recent reviews and high ratings, which diminishes confidence. Mews’s extensive feature set, recent review volume, and high satisfaction ratings make it the better option for hotels looking to modernize and scale.
For hotels aiming for operational efficiency, guest experience, and growth, Mews provides the tools, support, and reputation necessary to succeed. If your goal is to implement a reliable, adaptable, and future-ready PMS, Mews is the recommended choice. However, if your property remains small, budget-conscious, and basic management suffices, Lodgit could be a fit—though it’s less proven in today’s competitive landscape.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 和 Mews PMS 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 32 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问