The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 95 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Loopon 表现出色 .
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Digital Acceptance & Payment Capture and Guest Segmentation & Targeting.
基于 HTR 上 95 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 95 |
在分析了 95 条经验证的评价后,Loopon 用户最看重其 ,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 综合费率管理工具, 基于云的功能, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
综合费率管理工具
▾
|
|
|
+
基于云的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #17 0 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #6 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #4 39 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 0 条评价 | #7 11 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 0 条评价 | #6 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #5 56 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #4 53 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #8 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 0 条评价 | #5 29 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 0 条评价 | #12 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #3 36 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 0 条评价 | #6 6 条评价 |
Choosing between Loopon Pre-Stay and Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. While Loopon offers a straightforward, communication-focused approach, Oracle's platform provides an extensive suite of upselling tools integrated into a comprehensive property management system. Both aim to increase revenue, but they do so through different mechanisms and feature sets.
Loopon is primarily a guest communication tool that unifies pre-stay, in-stay, and post-stay messaging to foster guest relationships and facilitate upselling. Oracle's solution, meanwhile, emphasizes automated, AI-driven upselling across multiple channels, with a broader feature set designed for larger, more complex hotel operations. Which aligns better with your current priorities?
Loopon and Oracle serve the same core goal: boosting hotel revenue through guest engagement. However, they diverge significantly in execution. Loopon centralizes all communication into a single platform, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing personalized messaging and guest feedback. Oracle's platform, with its 13 exclusive features, automates and personalizes upselling at scale, supporting larger properties or chains with complex needs.
Given the review data, Oracle's platform scores a 77.76 in HT Score with 78 reviews, reflecting broader adoption and recent feedback. Loopon, with zero reviews, lacks current validation, making Oracle the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven results and ongoing support.
Oracle's platform outperforms Loopon in usability, with a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating based on extensive reviews, and a 4.43/5 onboarding score. Users praise its intuitive interface and comprehensive training resources, despite some noting its complexity for smaller teams. Conversely, Loopon's interface and onboarding are unreviewed, leaving its user experience unverified.
Edge: Oracle. With its higher ratings and more recent feedback, Oracle's system is more likely to be adopted quickly by your staff, reducing training time and increasing immediate impact.
Oracle's platform offers 13 distinct features, including digital acceptance & payment, guest segmentation, check-in upselling, and multi-channel delivery—none of which Loopon provides. Loopon focuses solely on centralized guest communication, lacking automation, dynamic pricing, and targeted merchandising features.
Therefore, Oracle's feature set positions it as the more comprehensive upselling solution. Edge: Oracle Hospitality, offering a broader array of tools to support complex, multi-channel upselling strategies.
Oracle's support and onboarding ratings (4.18/5 and 4.43/5, respectively) are backed by 78 recent reviews, with many users citing strong support and effective training. One reviewer notes, “The support team is responsive and always available to assist,” underscoring its reliability. Loopon, with zero reviews, offers no recent data to validate support quality.
Edge: Oracle. Its extensive user base and recent reviews give confidence in ongoing support and training, essential for maximizing ROI.
Oracle's platform boasts 391 integrations, including several shared partners like Mews, BEONx, and Protel. Loopon has only 11 verified partners, with some notable integrations like Sirvoy and apaleo. The broader integration ecosystem enables Oracle to connect seamlessly with various PMS, POS, and analytics systems.
Edge: Oracle Hospitality, providing more flexibility and scope for hotels with complex tech stacks needing connectivity across multiple platforms.
Since Loopon has no recent reviews, we rely on Oracle’s scores: a 4.31/5 overall rating, with a 9.22/5 NPS score, indicating high customer satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments, including luxury and branded hotels, rate Oracle highly (4.5/5 and 4.33/5). Loopon's lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user sentiment accurately.
Edge: Oracle Hospitality. Its proven track record and recent positive feedback suggest a more dependable solution, especially for larger properties.
Loopon offers no publicly available pricing details, indicating possibly a custom quote or limited deployment. Oracle's platform charges a base fee of $100 per month, with no implementation or additional fees reported. Its pricing model is straightforward, making budget planning easier.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for Loopon, Oracle's transparent and predictable costs make it easier to evaluate ROI and allocate budgets.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising is a full-featured, AI-powered upselling platform that integrates tightly with your existing property management system. Its broad feature set and recent reviews support its suitability for larger, tech-savvy hotels looking to automate revenue growth.
Loopon Pre-Stay offers a simplified, communication-centric approach that excels in guest relationship management and reputation building. However, its lack of recent reviews and narrower feature set make it less ideal for hotels seeking a comprehensive upselling solution.
If your hotel needs proven, extensive capabilities backed by recent user feedback, Oracle is the clear choice. For smaller hotels prioritizing guest communication and feedback, Loopon can be effective but lacks validation at this time.
In conclusion, Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising stands out as the more reliable and feature-rich option, especially for hotels aiming to scale their upselling efforts efficiently.
追加销售软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Loopon Pre-Stay 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 办理登机手续追加销售 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 数字受理与支付采集 | ||
| 辅助产品营销 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 1 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"With success hinging on so many unknown variables in an altered marketplace, Nor1 provides me with a sense of control. In the times that we’re in, that’s priceless."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的... 用户称赞OPERA的集成费率管理功能,它简化了日常运营,使员工能够专注于追加销售和交叉销售。尽管有些人觉得操作繁琐,但这款工具可以帮助员工通过清晰、精简的流程优化收入潜力。
OPERA 的云特性因其减少对本地服务器的依赖、改善远程访问以及确保无缝更新而备受赞誉。这些功能在统一运营和维持有效的追加销售策略方面具有显著优势。
OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加... OPERA 以其强大的集成能力而备受赞誉,其集成能力涵盖 POS 系统和分析系统等众多第三方系统。这种广泛的集成有助于统一酒店运营和数据,从而创造更有意义的追加销售机会,并优化宾客体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户反映,OPERA 的众多功能导致学习难度加大,入职流程复杂。这对小型酒店的影响更大,因为它们的培训资源可能有限,从而引发成本和效率方面的担忧。
OPERA 的高昂成本(包括许可、实施和定制)给小型或单体酒店带来了障碍。虽然 OPERA 功能强大,但对于预算紧张的酒店来说,这些成本可能超过其带来的好处。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Loopon Pre-Stay 和 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Loopon Pre-Stay 提供 11 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 提供 391 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Loopon Pre-Stay:否。Oracle OPERA Guest Engagement and Merchandising:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Loopon 的 HT Score 为 0,Oracle Hospitality 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问