The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 528 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Loopon 表现出色 .
Oaky by Plusgrade 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
基于 HTR 上 528 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 528 |
在分析了 528 条经验证的评价后,Loopon 用户最看重其 ,而 Oaky by Plusgrade 用户则强调 upselling efficiency, user interface and system usability, 客户支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Upselling Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and System Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Personalization and Targeted Promotions
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告系统面临的挑战
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 0 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #2 263 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #1 141 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 0 条评价 | #2 57 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 0 条评价 | #2 216 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #2 278 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #2 208 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #3 33 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 0 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 0 条评价 | #1 315 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #2 81 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 0 条评价 | #2 52 条评价 |
Choosing between Loopon Pre-Stay and Oaky by Plusgrade hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to boost revenue through upselling and guest communication, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your challenge is to identify which platform aligns better with your operational complexity, guest engagement goals, and existing tech stack.
Loopon offers a holistic approach to guest communication, integrating pre-stay, in-stay, and post-stay messaging into one system. Conversely, Oaky specializes in targeted, automated upselling with a deeper feature set and broader integrations. The decision ultimately depends on whether your focus is on communication or upselling.
Loopon and Oaky are both designed to increase revenue, but they approach this goal differently. Loopon emphasizes a unified communication system that fosters a continuous guest conversation across every stage of the guest journey, whereas Oaky centers on personalized, automated upselling at multiple touchpoints.
Loopon's reviews highlight its ability to consolidate all guest interactions into a single conversation, helping hotels better understand and serve their guests. Oaky’s recent reviews, however, demonstrate its effectiveness in delivering highly targeted offers that significantly boost ancillary revenue, with 443 reviews and a 4.84/5 rating in the last six months—far more recent and plentiful than Loopon’s zero reviews.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
If your hotel needs powerful, data-driven upselling with extensive segmentation, dynamic pricing, and multi-channel delivery, Oaky is the clear choice. It is particularly suited for properties aiming to maximize incremental revenue from ancillary services like room upgrades, spa packages, or special experiences.
If your team prioritizes unified guest communication, reputation management, and pre-arrival engagement without focusing solely on upselling, Loopon offers a comprehensive platform. It’s better suited for hotels that want to foster ongoing guest conversations and feedback across the entire guest lifecycle, rather than just boosting revenue.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
Oaky’s user rating of 4.84/5 in ease of use and onboarding reflects its intuitive interface and rapid setup. Reviews mention that onboarding is straightforward, with hotel teams quickly adopting its automation and segmentation features.
Loopon, however, scored 0/5 on ease of use, with no recent reviews to gauge its current UI or onboarding process. Given the limited data, the weight tilts heavily toward Oaky's demonstrated usability and support.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
Oaky offers 12 distinct features, including guest segmentation, A/B testing, multi-channel delivery, dynamic pricing, offer templates, and offer orchestration—features absent in Loopon. These tools enable highly personalized, timely offers, and sophisticated campaign management.
Loopon’s feature set is limited to guest communication and reputation management, with no unique upselling tools. Its core strength lies in integrating all guest interactions into one system, but it lacks the specialized upselling functionalities Oaky provides.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
Oaky consistently receives 4.87/5 for customer support and onboarding, with reviews praising its friendly, responsive team. Hotels report quick resolutions and helpful guidance, emphasizing the platform’s ease of implementation and ongoing assistance.
Loopon has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess support quality. Based on available data, Oaky’s support is clearly stronger and more reliable for hotels seeking assistance.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
Oaky boasts 54 verified integrations, including major PMS and hotel tech systems, with six shared partners with Loopon. Its extensive partner network facilitates smoother setup and real-time data exchange, critical for effective upselling.
Loopon offers only 11 verified partners, with less emphasis on broad integration and automation. For hotels prioritizing seamless tech connectivity, Oaky’s larger integration ecosystem is a distinct advantage.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
With 443 recent reviews and a 4.84/5 rating, Oaky's user satisfaction far surpasses Loopon’s zero reviews and 0/5 score. Hotels across various segments—luxury, boutique, branded, and resort—highlight Oaky’s ease of use, revenue impact, and support.
Since Loopon has no recent reviews or ratings, Oaky’s overwhelmingly positive feedback makes it the superior choice for most hoteliers seeking proven, current performance.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
Loopon does not disclose pricing details, suggesting it may be customized or less transparent. Oaky charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or extra charges, making its pricing predictable and accessible for mid-sized hotels.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Loopon, Oaky’s clear, competitive fee offers better value for hotels evaluating ROI and total cost of ownership.
Edge: Oaky by Plusgrade.
The core difference is that Loopon specializes in guest communication and reputation, while Oaky excels at upselling and revenue maximization. Loopon’s approach is suited for hotels seeking a unified message platform, whereas Oaky’s features are designed for aggressive, targeted revenue growth from ancillary sales.
Choose Loopon if your priority is guest engagement and feedback across the entire journey, especially if reputation management is your focus. Opt for Oaky if your hotel’s primary goal is to increase direct revenue through sophisticated, automated upselling tools.
If your hotel needs to rapidly boost ancillary revenue with proven, current tools, Oaky is the clear winner. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features demonstrate its value for hotels ready to scale their upselling efforts.
For hotels prioritizing long-term guest relationships and reputation, Loopon remains a strong contender—though, based on current data, Oaky’s offerings and support make it the more compelling choice overall.
追加销售软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Loopon Pre-Stay 和 Oaky by Plusgrade 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 优惠实验和 A/B 测试 | ||
| 动态升级定价 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 报价模板库 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"With Oaky, guests can clearly see what extra services or products we have to offer. By looking through all our services they can choose to add things they did not even know they wa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Oaky allows us to be creative and feature relevant and exciting offers to our guests. The solution is extremely flexible and easy to use, helping our teams to offer unique services..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Reviewers consistently commend Oaky's ability to streamline and enhance the upselling process, making it easier to generate additional revenue. Users... Reviewers consistently commend Oaky's ability to streamline and enhance the upselling process, making it easier to generate additional revenue. Users appreciate the ease of promoting room upgrades and packages, contributing significantly to boosting hotel revenue.
The platform's user-friendly design is repeatedly praised, allowing both new and experienced users to engage effectively with the software. This acces... The platform's user-friendly design is repeatedly praised, allowing both new and experienced users to engage effectively with the software. This accessibility helps hotels employ upselling strategies without extensive training.
Oaky的客户支持因其高效和专业而广受好评,尤其值得一提的是,部分团队成员始终致力于提供积极的客户体验。及时响应更是被誉为Oaky的一大优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出Oaky的报告系统存在问题,需要改进其清晰度并加强与现有酒店系统的集成。用户反映难以获取有关追加销售活动的全面数据。
Oaky 可与众多酒店物业管理系统无缝集成,增强实时数据同步。然而,也存在一些问题,例如部分用户在追踪追加销售优惠时,会遇到需要手动输入的复杂情况。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Loopon Pre-Stay 和 Oaky by Plusgrade 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Loopon Pre-Stay 提供 11 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oaky by Plusgrade 提供 54 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Oaky by Plusgrade 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Loopon Pre-Stay:否。Oaky by Plusgrade:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Loopon 的 HT Score 为 0,Oaky by Plusgrade 的为 94。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问