The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Passepartout 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 0 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 Passepartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #41 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 35 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #25 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #38 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Maestro PMS and Passepartout aim to serve different segments of the property management market, with Maestro offering a more feature-rich and widely adopted solution. While Passepartout is positioned as a simpler, perhaps more affordable option, Maestro’s extensive capabilities and recent customer feedback make it the more proven choice for most hotels today. So, which system truly aligns with your needs?
Maestro PMS is a mature, comprehensive platform with over 56 reviews and a 4.36/5 overall rating, reflecting recent positive feedback from users. Passepartout, on the other hand, has zero reviews and no overall rating, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance. Maestro’s robust feature set includes modules for spa, revenue management, integrated CRS, and more, which Passepartout lacks entirely. Do you prioritize proven, feature-rich software, or are you comfortable with unverified options?
Maestro’s support score is high at 4.78/5, with many users praising its immediate response and helpful staff, while Passepartout’s customer support quality remains unverified. The recent reviews of Maestro highlight its ease of use, strong integrations, and dedicated support, whereas Passepartout’s user experience details are unavailable. Are you willing to trust an unreviewed system, or do you need the reassurance of a well-supported platform?
If your hotel operates in North America or Europe and needs a feature-rich, flexible PMS with extensive integrations and modules, Maestro is the clear choice. It’s ideal for independent hotels, luxury resorts, and multi-property groups seeking comprehensive control, automation, and support. For smaller properties or those with a tighter budget, Passepartout might seem appealing, but without recent reviews or data, its suitability remains uncertain.
For hotels requiring multi-property support, advanced booking and revenue management, or integrated contactless features, Maestro delivers proven benefits. Conversely, if your property is small, local, or just starting to explore PMS options, Passepartout’s simplicity or lower-cost approach could be considered—yet the lack of reviews makes this a gamble.
In summary, if proven performance and a broad feature set are your priorities, Maestro wins. If your hotel doesn’t need extensive features or you’re testing options with limited risk, Passepartout might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
Maestro PMS scores 4.04/5 in ease of use, with many reviews citing its somewhat outdated interface and the need for training. Users mention that it can be cumbersome to navigate, especially for newer staff, and some features require multiple clicks to access. The onboarding process is rated 4.36/5 and is generally described as smooth, but the UI’s age could hinder adoption.
Passepartout’s user interface and ease of use are unverified due to the absence of reviews. Given Maestro’s large review base and recent feedback, it’s reasonable to conclude that Maestro’s UI, while functional, could benefit from modernization.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS offers over 58 features exclusive to its platform, including modules for spa & wellness, channel management, EPoS, revenue management, integrated CRS, online booking engine, guest CRM, and more. Passepartout’s feature set is not detailed or comparable, with no unique modules or capabilities listed.
Maestro’s diverse feature suite provides a real advantage for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution capable of handling complex operations. Passepartout’s lack of documented features or integrations makes it difficult to compare, but the absence of detailed features suggests it’s more suited for basic management needs.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Support is a standout feature for Maestro PMS, with a score of 4.78/5 based on reviews praising quick, helpful responses from its team. Users frequently mention Maestro’s availability via phone, chat, and email, and appreciate its proactive approach to problem-solving. Many reviews state support is consistently responsive, often resolving issues on first contact.
Passepartout’s support quality is unverified, with no reviews available to assess its responsiveness or assistance. Given the high scores and active feedback about Maestro’s customer service, it’s clear that support is a significant advantage.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS boasts 89 verified integration partners, including critical systems like Criton, Curacity, Bookboost, Zaplox, and Inntopia. These integrations cover revenue, booking, marketing, and operational tools. Passepartout has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited or no connectivity with third-party systems.
The extensive integrations in Maestro enable hotel teams to connect their existing technology stack and streamline workflows effectively. Passepartout’s lack of integrations poses a risk if your property relies on specific tools or systems.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS’s recent reviews reflect a strong user satisfaction, with a 4.36/5 overall rating and an 88% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like resorts, boutique hotels, and independent properties rate it highly, appreciating its customizable features and support.
Passepartout has no reviews and thus no ratings to compare. Without recent user feedback, it’s impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive Passepartout.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS’s pricing starts at $900, with no mention of monthly fees, implementation costs, or trial periods. Its pricing model appears straightforward but may vary depending on modules selected.
Passepartout’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of costs or subscription plans. The lack of transparent pricing makes it difficult to compare value directly, but Maestro’s known price points provide clarity.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-restricted, or doesn’t require advanced operations. Also, if a modern, intuitive UI is a priority, Maestro’s dated interface could be a drawback.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep customization, multi-property support, or advanced automation features. Also, the lack of recent reviews makes its suitability uncertain for larger, more complex operations.
Maestro PMS is a comprehensive, feature-rich system with proven performance, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. Its broad module set and support make it suitable for hotels with complex needs and multiple properties. If you want a reliable, well-supported solution with ongoing updates, Maestro is your clear choice.
Passepartout appears to target smaller, less complex properties or those on a tight budget, but the absence of recent reviews and detailed features makes it a risky option. Without verified support, integrations, or user feedback, it’s difficult to recommend Passepartout confidently.
In conclusion, if your hotel values proven capabilities and support backed by recent, positive reviews, Maestro PMS is the superior choice. If you’re comfortable with an unreviewed system and only need basic management tools, Passepartout could be considered—but proceed cautiously.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 Passepartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 46 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 Passepartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passepartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。Passepartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 70,Passepartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问