The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 944 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 944 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 886 |
在分析了 944 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #41 7 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 35 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 11 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 4 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #25 26 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #20 31 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Maestro PMS (Northwind) and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Maestro PMS offers a more traditional, feature-rich setup, while Mews emphasizes automation, scalability, and a modern user experience. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and strengths differ markedly—how will your property benefit most?
If your hotel prioritizes cutting-edge automation and extensive third-party integrations, Mews’s cloud-native platform makes a compelling case. Conversely, for highly customizable modules and multi-property support with a longer history, Maestro PMS might be more aligned. Are you ready to make the right choice?
Maestro PMS and Mews PMS both streamline hotel operations, but they solve different problems. Maestro’s on-premise or cloud model offers deep customization and broad module support for complex, multi-property, or luxury resorts, with over 20 integrated modules and a focus on detailed reporting.
Mews, however, targets modern hotels seeking automation and flexibility, with real-time data, over 1,000 integrations via its marketplace, and a user-friendly interface. While Maestro’s support is highly praised for its responsiveness, Mews’s recent reviews emphasize its ease of use and quick onboarding, with 98 recent reviews compared to Maestro’s 56.
Do these contrasting strengths influence your decision?
If your property needs a cloud-based solution with high scalability, frequent updates, and a rich ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It’s especially ideal for hotels that value automation, contactless check-in, and open API access, making it a strong fit for properties aiming to modernize and grow quickly.
If, however, your hotel requires extensive customization, detailed reporting, and modules like Spa & Wellness or multi-property management from the same system, Maestro PMS’s longer track record and comprehensive features may serve you better. For boutique, resort, or multi-property groups prioritizing flexibility, Maestro’s dedicated modules are advantageous.
In summary, for tech-forward, scalable growth, choose Mews. For tailored, detailed operations with a focus on customization, Maestro offers a compelling alternative.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding—"Mews is the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market," states a user. Its cloud-based design allows staff to log in from anywhere, and its onboarding process is often completed within days, with support praised for responsiveness.
Maestro, on the other hand, has a 4.04/5 rating, with reviews noting that its modules, while feature-rich, can feel cumbersome to navigate and require more clicks—"The modules are a little cumbersome to navigate for newer employees." Support is highly rated, yet some users find the UI somewhat dated and less streamlined.
Edge: Mews.
Maestro PMS offers 58 unique features, including specialized modules like Spa & Wellness and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks—features not available in Mews. Its comprehensive suite covers front office, sales & catering, golf, spa, and multi-property management.
Mews, however, has 55 unique features, excelling with multi-lingual support, guest CRM, guest profiles, and robust automation tools. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, allowing rapid addition of functionalities and third-party apps.
Edge: Mews, due to its extensive integrations and modern features.
Maestro PMS’s 4.78/5 customer support rating reflects a long-standing reputation for 24/7 support, quick responses, and dedicated education services—"Support is always available, quick to respond." Many reviews praise their support team’s responsiveness and willingness to assist.
Mews’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.27/5, with some recent reviews mentioning occasional bugs but quick resolution—"Their support team resolves issues rapidly and keeps disruptions minimal." Customers value the proactive support, but some note that support can occasionally be inconsistent.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Mews leads significantly with 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through the Marketplace, with common partners like Criton and Zaplox. It excels at connecting with revenue management, POS, and channel management tools, supporting modern tech ecosystems.
Maestro PMS offers 89 verified partners, including specialized integrations like Zingle, Guestware, and Inntopia, focusing more on property-specific modules. While sufficient for many hotels, its ecosystem isn’t as expansive as Mews’s.
Edge: Mews.
Mews garners a higher overall rating of 4.62/5, with 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 758 reviews—more recent reviews (98 in the last 6 months) reinforce its popularity. Hotels of all sizes, from hostels to boutique hotels, praise Mews for its ease of use and automation.
Maestro’s rating is 4.36/5 from 56 reviews, with an 88% recommendation rate. Its users, often from luxury or resort properties, appreciate its deep features but note UI and usability can be less intuitive.
Edge: Mews.
Both products share a base price of $900, with no freemium versions, optional monthly fees, or implementation costs listed publicly. Pricing models suggest a straightforward flat fee, but detailed ongoing costs or added modules may vary.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision should focus on value derived from features, support, and integration capabilities rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid deployment, frequent upgrades, or a highly intuitive, modern platform.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or highly specialized modules that are only available in legacy systems.
Mews stands out for its user-friendly, cloud-native approach, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of adoption and modern features. Its ecosystem of integrations and automation tools suit hotels looking to innovate and scale rapidly.
Maestro offers a more traditional, customizable system suitable for properties with complex operational requirements and multi-property management needs. Its support and detailed modules make it ideal for luxury or resort hotels that value depth over speed of deployment.
If your hotel values simplicity, automation, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. If you need extensive customization, detailed reporting, and multi-property control, Maestro provides a solid, long-standing platform.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 Mews PMS 共享 55 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 70,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问