The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Marriott International 表现出色 .
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1 | 107 |
在分析了 108 条经验证的评价后,Marriott International 用户最看重其 ,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #59 1 条评价 | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #68 1 条评价 | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #43 1 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Marriott's proprietary FOSSE is designed for large hotel chains with complex needs, while myCloud Hospitality PMS caters to small and medium-sized hotels with an emphasis on cloud-based flexibility. Both aim to streamline operations but diverge significantly in usability, features, and support.
FOSSE is Marriott’s in-house solution, optimized for its extensive portfolio, but it receives mixed reviews for ease of use. myCloud Hospitality PMS, with a much higher review count and recent feedback, stands out for its user-friendliness and detailed features. Which system fits your hotel’s size and operational demands best?
FOSSE is built for large properties within the Marriott ecosystem, focusing on integrating multiple operational functions into one platform. However, it scores poorly in ease of use, with a rating of 2/5 from only one review, and users report it’s menu-heavy and less intuitive, especially for staff without technical backgrounds.
In contrast, myCloud Hospitality PMS delivers a 4.81/5 overall rating from 95 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its simplicity and quick setup. Reviewers highlight its cloud-based accessibility, automation, and detailed reporting features, making it more adaptable for small to mid-sized hotels.
The core question: Do you need a system tailored for a hospitality giant like Marriott, or a flexible, easy-to-use platform suitable for your property's unique needs?
If your hotel is part of the Marriott network or operates at a scale where extensive integration and proprietary control matter, FOSSE might seem appropriate. Still, its limited user reviews, notably only one in the last six months, suggest it’s not actively refined based on user feedback.
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based solution that can seamlessly integrate with OTAs, payment systems, and offer advanced features like contactless check-in or mobile keys, myCloud Hospitality PMS is the clear choice. Its proven ease of use, recent positive reviews, and higher customer satisfaction scores make it more suitable for most small to medium hotels.
For large hotel groups requiring extensive internal customization and integrations, FOSSE might be suitable, but for your day-to-day management, myCloud’s ease and recent enhancements make it the better option.
FOSSE suffers from a low ease of use rating of 2/5, with reviews describing it as menu-heavy, lacking a GUI, and requiring significant keyboard shortcuts. Many users find it outdated and cumbersome, often needing to jump through hoops to complete basic tasks like checking availability or syncing data.
Meanwhile, myCloud Hospitality PMS scores near-perfect at 4.79/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, smooth workflow, and quick onboarding. Users mention its easy navigation, detailed reports, and mobile accessibility as major advantages.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary system, offers limited information about its features, and reviews reveal deficiencies in automation and user customization. Its core functionalities seem to focus on basic reservation management and guest check-ins, with no mention of advanced modules like revenue management, EPoS, or integrated CRM.
myCloud Hospitality PMS boasts 59 distinct features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, automated night audit, guest CRM, mobile app, digital registration, and integrated payment processing. These features cover nearly every aspect of hotel operation, providing a comprehensive toolkit for efficiency.
Conclusion: myCloud’s feature set far exceeds FOSSE’s, especially for automation, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
FOSSE’s support ratings are moderate, with a 3/5 rating from reviews, and users often mention delays in syncing and troubleshooting issues. The review quoting a 2/5 rating describes support as slow and support staff as less responsive, citing outdated support channels.
In contrast, myCloud Hospitality PMS has a 4.83/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Users describe their support team as always available, knowledgeable, and instrumental in resolving issues swiftly.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
FOSSE only integrates with two verified partners, Actabl and Marriott International, limiting its connectivity options. This constrains your ability to connect with third-party tools necessary for modern hotel operations.
myCloud Hospitality PMS offers 29 verified partners, including OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, payment gateways, CRM systems, and analytics tools. Its open API and extensive integrations enable a more connected, efficient workflow.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
FOSSE, with just one review, receives a 2/5 rating, mainly due to its complexity, lack of support, and outdated interface. Its limited feedback indicates dissatisfaction with daily usability and automation.
Conversely, myCloud Hospitality PMS enjoys a 4.81/5 rating from 95 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting ease of use, support, and feature richness. Hospitality businesses of all sizes, especially independents and boutique hotels, rate it highly for improving operational flow.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable, and as a proprietary Marriott system, it's likely included as part of corporate contracts or internal budgets. Its hidden costs or implementation fees are unpublicized.
myCloud Hospitality PMS charges a $900 base price, with no monthly fees or implementation costs mentioned. Its transparent pricing and cloud-based subscription model make it accessible for small and medium hotels without large capital investments.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary system, is tailored for extensive chain operations but suffers from poor usability and limited recent feedback, making it less suitable for most hotels outside Marriott’s ecosystem. Its outdated interface and limited third-party integrations also restrict flexibility.
myCloud Hospitality PMS delivers a highly-rated, feature-rich, cloud-based platform designed for small and mid-sized hotels. It offers effortless usability, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews that underscore its value for improving operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Choose FOSSE if your hotel is part of Marriott or has complex internal needs that justify a proprietary system. Opt for myCloud Hospitality PMS if you seek a modern, user-friendly platform that supports growth, automation, and guest engagement.
In most cases, myCloud Hospitality PMS provides a more tangible, accessible solution for hotels aiming to optimize their daily operations without the steep learning curve or limited support of FOSSE.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FOSSE 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FOSSE 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。FOSSE 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。myCloud Hospitality PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 2.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FOSSE:否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Marriott International 的 HT Score 为 0,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案