The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Maxial |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Maxial |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Maxial |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Maxial by Maxial and Sirvoy by Sirvoy hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Maxial offers an all-in-one management platform with AI-driven features but lacks recent user reviews and a defined customer support reputation. Sirvoy, on the other hand, has a solid reputation, nearly 100 reviews in the past six months, and a high customer satisfaction score. Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize feature depth or proven support and recent feedback.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this differently. Maxial emphasizes comprehensive management with AI insights, while Sirvoy focuses on ease of use, affordability, and channel management. Which aligns better with your operational priorities?
Is your hotel looking for a broad, integrated management system with AI insights? Or do you prioritize straightforward, reliable booking and guest management through a user-friendly interface? The answer will guide your choice.
Maxial’s core appeal is its all-encompassing property management system designed to optimize operations across reservations, billing, housekeeping, and more, with AI-driven review summaries and recommendations. However, its review count is zero, and its lack of recent feedback leaves its real-world effectiveness uncertain.
Sirvoy’s strength lies in its high user satisfaction, with 95 reviews and a recent 32 reviews in the last six months. It is praised for its intuitive interface, excellent support, and affordability, making it especially appealing to small and medium-sized hotels.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive system with potential AI-driven insights, Maxial might sound appealing. But if proven support and recent user feedback matter most, Sirvoy is clearly the safer choice. Which features are you willing to prioritize?
Sirvoy boasts a user rating of 4.64/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive design, straightforward setup, and helpful support. Customers highlight how easy it is for new staff to adapt, with onboarding rated at 4.6/5, and praise the prompt, friendly customer service, which makes staff adoption smooth.
Maxial, however, has a 0/5 rating with no recent reviews, leaving its usability unverified. Its lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess whether it is as approachable or user-friendly as Sirvoy.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, payment processing, and mobile functionalities. It also integrates with major booking channels and offers a website builder, fulfilling essential operational needs for small and medium properties.
Maxial has no listed features or integrations, making it impossible to compare beyond its AI capabilities. Its AI review summaries and recommendations are innovative, but without more features or proven support, it cannot match Sirvoy's extensive functionality.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support is rated 4.85/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Users describe support agents as friendly, knowledgeable, and quick to resolve issues, making onboarding and daily operations less stressful.
Maxial has no reviews or support ratings available, leaving its support quality unverified. This absence suggests either limited support or a lack of recent customer feedback to evaluate.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, GDS, and various payment providers. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies channel management and reservation synchronization.
Maxial provides no verified integrations, which may limit its ability to connect with third-party tools or booking channels. For hoteliers relying on multiple platforms, Sirvoy’s integrations are a clear advantage.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Since Maxial has no reviews, we rely on Sirvoy’s data: 95 reviews, 32 in the last six months, with a 94% likelihood to recommend and a 9.41/10 NPS score. Hotel segments like Bed & Breakfasts, Resorts, and Boutique Hotels consistently give high ratings for ease of use, support, and value.
Maxial’s lack of recent reviews prevents meaningful comparison. The strength of Sirvoy’s recent review data makes it the more reliable option for current user satisfaction.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Maxial’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating it may not have a transparent or standardized pricing model. This could imply custom quotes or a less accessible entry point.
Sirvoy charges a base price of $200 per month, with no implementation fee. Its straightforward pricing and clear structure make budgeting easier for small to medium-sized properties.
If transparency and predictable costs are priorities, Sirvoy offers more clarity.
Not ideal if you prefer proven usability, extensive support, or quick implementation.
Not ideal if you require advanced reporting, in-depth CRM, or a system with extensive automation capabilities.
Maxial appears designed as a broad, AI-driven management platform aiming to cover all operational aspects with advanced insights. Its lack of recent reviews and real-world support feedback pose risks for hoteliers seeking proven solutions.
Sirvoy’s extensive, recent reviews, support excellence, and feature set make it a dependable choice for smaller hotels and property managers. Its affordability and ease of use reduce onboarding friction and enhance guest management.
If your hotel needs a stable, well-supported platform with proven satisfaction, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Maxial might appeal if you’re looking for an ambitious, all-in-one system that’s still untested in live environments.
When choosing, consider whether you prioritize support and recent feedback or cutting-edge, AI-enhanced management. For most hotels, Sirvoy’s current reputation makes it the safer and more reliable choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maxial 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maxial 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maxial:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maxial 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问