The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Medialog 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
基于 HTR 上 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 395 |
在分析了 395 条经验证的评价后,Medialog 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #76 0 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #72 0 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #75 0 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #68 0 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #52 0 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Medialog and ThinkReservations PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and regional presence. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their core strengths diverge significantly. Medialog, with nearly 35 years of experience, offers a highly customizable, on-premise solution tailored mainly for European hotels, while ThinkReservations, with over 350 recent reviews, emphasizes ease of use, seamless OTA integration, and guest communication.
Your decision should consider whether you prioritize extensive features and regional support or user-friendly automation and recent positive reviews. Are you looking for a tried-and-true platform or a system with a large, active user base and high satisfaction?
ThinkReservations scores a near-perfect 4.88/5 based on 356 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and robust features. Medialog’s ratings are nonexistent or zero, indicating a lack of recent user feedback and a smaller, regional customer base. Given the high volume and recency of ThinkReservations’ reviews, it offers more modern, reliable support and ongoing improvements.
If your hotel values proven recent performance and customer satisfaction, ThinkReservations should be your go-to choice. Medialog’s lack of current review data makes it a less confident pick for most hoteliers today.
Medialog and ThinkReservations both serve property management needs but do so from very different angles. Medialog, established in 1988 and based in France, focuses on a comprehensive, hybrid PMS that centralizes operations across hotels and restaurants. It offers on-premise deployment, a suite of 28 shared and unique features, and a focus on reliability, especially within European markets. Its 0/5 ratings and absence of recent reviews suggest minimal current customer satisfaction, making it hard to assess current performance.
In contrast, ThinkReservations, founded in 2012 and based in Seattle, boasts 356 reviews with a 4.88/5 rating and an NPS score of 9.68/10. Its cloud-based platform emphasizes ease of use, OTA integration, and automation, with recent reviews highlighting operational improvements. The key difference: Medialog’s on-premise, highly customizable system suits hotels with specific compliance or regional needs, while ThinkReservations caters to hotels seeking a user-friendly, modern platform with high customer satisfaction.
Do you need a long-established, customizable system for complex operations or a streamlined, highly-rated platform with recent user endorsements?
If your hotel needs a modern, easy-to-learn PMS with rapid onboarding, extensive OTA integrations, and features like automated guest messaging, ThinkReservations is the clear choice. Its 356 reviews from diverse hotel segments—mainly B&Bs, boutique hotels, and small resorts—highlight its simplicity and operational efficiency.
Medialog may be suitable if your hotel operates in Europe, requires a hybrid or on-premise solution, or has complex revenue management needs, notably with its revenue management module and integrated CRS. However, the absence of recent reviews and a lack of recent updates suggest it may not meet the expectations of hotels seeking current, reliable vendor support.
For most hoteliers, especially those in North America or seeking high user satisfaction, ThinkReservations is the better fit. Medialog’s niche focus and outdated ratings limit its appeal unless your operation specifically requires its unique features.
ThinkReservations earns a 4.82/5 rating based on its intuitive interface, seamless onboarding, and positive staff feedback. Reviews frequently mention how quickly new users adapt and how support staff make implementation smooth, with comments like “seamless onboarding” and “easy to navigate.” Its cloud-based system simplifies staff training and guest management, reducing operational complexity.
Medialog, on the other hand, scores a zero due to a lack of recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current usability or onboarding experience. Its on-premise model suggests a steeper learning curve with potential IT requirements, and no recent user feedback makes it less reliable as a user-friendly solution today.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Medialog offers 28 features, including specialized modules like revenue management, integrated CRS, guest CRM, and ID/passport scanners—features tailored for complex or regulatory environments. Its unique offerings cater to hotels requiring detailed control, especially in Europe.
ThinkReservations provides 23 shared features plus 16 exclusive ones, such as guest communication via SMS, automated reminders, drag-and-drop tapechart, online check-in, and integrated payment terminals. These features are designed for operational efficiency, upselling, and real-time reporting, with many specifically aimed at streamlining guest interactions.
Given the current user data, ThinkReservations’ feature set aligns better with modern hotel operations. It covers essential automation and guest engagement functions that today’s hoteliers prioritize.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.82/5 support rating, with reviews praising its “excellent support,” “quick response,” and “knowledgeable staff.” Multiple comments highlight how their support team helps resolve issues rapidly and supports continuous improvements.
Medialog’s support score is zero and lacks recent customer feedback, making it impossible to assess its current support quality. Historically, being a smaller, European-based system, Medialog might have dedicated support, but without recent reviews, its responsiveness and effectiveness remain uncertain.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Medialog integrates with 41 verified partners, including global solutions like HQ Revenue, Mirai, and RoomChecking. Its broad partner network spans European and international platforms, offering extensive customization options for diverse hotel needs.
ThinkReservations has 16 verified partners, with key integrations for OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and TripAdvisor, along with tools such as TrustYou and OpenKey. While fewer in number, its integrations focus on online distribution, guest messaging, and revenue management.
Considering current data, Medialog’s larger and more diverse integration network may appeal to hotels needing extensive custom connections, especially outside North America. ThinkReservations’ integrations are more targeted toward guest engagement and direct booking enhancements.
Edge: Medialog.
ThinkReservations dominates recent reviews, with a 4.88/5 rating across 356 reviews, mainly from small hotels, B&Bs, and boutique properties. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and revenue-boosting features, with comments like “It saved us a tremendous amount of time” and “The best booking platform I’ve used.”
Medialog has no recent reviews and a score of 0/5, reflecting a lack of current customer satisfaction data. The absence suggests that it may not be actively supported or adopted by hotels today.
For hotel segments like B&Bs, boutique hotels, and small resorts, ThinkReservations’ high rating and recent reviews make it the preferred choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Medialog charges a base price of $400 per month, with no free trial, freemium tier, or detailed pricing information available. Its pricing structure suggests a potentially high upfront or implementation cost, but exact details are scarce.
ThinkReservations costs $500 per month with no mention of setup fees or free trials. Its transparent pricing model, combined with a large user base, indicates a predictable cost structure aligned with modern SaaS models.
Given the available data, ThinkReservations offers a straightforward, predictable pricing setup, which many hoteliers find easier to budget for.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Medialog is a traditional, hybrid PMS with extensive regional integrations and specialized features. Its lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it a less attractive option for modern hoteliers seeking proven support and performance.
ThinkReservations excels in user satisfaction, ease of use, and a broad feature set tailored to small and boutique hotels. Its recent review volume and high ratings make it the safest, most reliable choice for hoteliers looking for a modern PMS that’s actively supported.
If your hotel needs a highly-rated, easy-to-implement system with excellent support and OTA integrations, go with ThinkReservations. If you operate in regions where Medialog’s specialized features or hybrid deployment are critical, and you can accept the lack of current reviews, Medialog may suit your needs.
In summary: For most hotels today, especially in North America, ThinkReservations offers a more reliable, well-supported, and highly-rated platform. Medialog remains a niche option best suited for specific regional or operational needs, but its outdated review data makes it a less certain choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Medialog 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 23 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Medialog 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Medialog 提供 41 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Medialog:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Medialog 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问