The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Medialog 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #76 0 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #72 0 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #75 0 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #68 0 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #52 0 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Medialog and Mews PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations, but with radically different market presence and capabilities. Medialog is a longstanding player rooted in Europe with a focus on on-premise solutions, while Mews is a cloud-native platform with a broader global footprint and a highly modern feature set. Your decision hinges on which aligns best with your hotel’s size, location, and digital strategy.
Are you seeking a tried-and-true system with in-depth local support or a flexible, scalable cloud platform that integrates with a vast ecosystem? Let's explore how these two systems compare across core hotel management needs.
Medialog has been around since 1988, offering a centralized, on-premise PMS primarily serving European hotels, restaurants, and multi-venue establishments. Its 0/5 overall rating reflects a lack of recent reviews and limited customer feedback, which raises questions about its ongoing support and innovation. Conversely, Mews maintains a near-perfect 4.62/5 rating based on 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, indicating an active, satisfied user base. Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations.
Both products aim to simplify hotel operations, but Medialog’s legacy system might struggle to keep pace with modern demands. Mews, on the other hand, is praised for its intuitive interface, cloud accessibility, and rapid deployment. Given the recent surge in reviews for Mews, it’s clear that it currently commands a more engaged, user-driven ecosystem. So, which system truly fits your hotel’s future plans?
If your hotel needs a modern, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It’s ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and those looking to incorporate automation and guest-centric features. Conversely, if your team prefers a traditional, on-premise solution with a long-standing presence in specific European markets and no immediate need for extensive cloud features, Medialog may suit your needs—though it’s worth noting the lack of recent reviews or active customer feedback.
For hotels prioritizing a broad partner network, frequent updates, and a strong track record of customer satisfaction, Mews’s 93% likelihood to recommend makes it the clear choice. Medialog’s near-zero recent reviews suggest it’s less aligned with current hospitality technology trends.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by numerous reviews praising its modern, user-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Users report that staff adapt easily, and the system allows remote management, which enhances operational flexibility. In contrast, Medialog’s 0/5 rating indicates no recent user feedback, likely reflecting outdated UI and limited usability, especially for staff accustomed to contemporary tech.
Given Mews's recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and streamlined workflows, the edge clearly goes to Mews for ease of implementation and daily use.
Mews offers 32 unique features absent in Medialog, including guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and a guest app—features that modern hotel guests now expect. Medialog’s lone unique feature is its on-premise deployment, which limits remote access and real-time data sharing.
Mews’s extensive feature set—such as automated space optimization, integrated payments, and advanced revenue management—provides more tools to enhance guest experience and operational control. The platform’s 27 shared features also cover core needs like reservations and billing but with more depth and versatility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores a 4.27/5, with recent reviews citing responsive support and helpful onboarding, especially given its global presence. Users note that the Mews team resolves bugs quickly and offers comprehensive training via Mews University. Medialog, with no recent reviews, offers limited data, suggesting it may not provide the same level of proactive, modern customer support.
Considering the volume and recency of reviews, Mews’s support stands out as more reliable and responsive in today’s hospitality environment.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including popular integrations like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, and a marketplace of over 1,000 apps. Medialog supports 41 verified integrations, focusing mainly on European and older legacy systems, with only a few exclusive partners like Mirai and Zenchef.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews allows your hotel to customize and expand functionalities with ease, making it highly adaptable to changing needs. Its open API and marketplace greatly surpass Medialog’s limited partner network.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.62/5 rating and recent feedback from boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties praising its user-friendliness, automation, and support. Hotel segments like boutique hotels and hostels rate Mews particularly highly, with many recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use and flexibility.
Medialog lacks recent reviews, and given its 0/5 rating, it’s clear that current hoteliers do not rate it highly. For hotels seeking validation from active users, Mews is the transparent, trusted choice.
Edge: Mews.
Medialog’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $400, with no mention of a trial or monthly fees. Mews charges a $900 monthly base price, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade solution.
While Mews’s higher price may be justified by its extensive features and support, the lack of transparent pricing for Medialog complicates direct comparison. Most modern hotels will find the investment in Mews worthwhile given its capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel is looking for frequent updates, remote management, or modern guest features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers on-premise solutions or operates exclusively within a very closed, legacy system environment.
Mews’s core advantage is its cloud-native architecture, active user base, and comprehensive integration ecosystem, making it the superior choice for modern, scalable hotel management. Medialog’s on-premise approach and European focus serve niche needs but lack recent reviews or evidence of active development.
If your hotel values ongoing support, frequent updates, and a broad partner network, go with Mews. For those with a strong preference for traditional, localized control and limited need for modern features, Medialog could suffice—but it’s an increasingly risky choice.
In today’s fast-evolving hospitality landscape, Mews offers a future-proof platform that supports your team’s growth, guest satisfaction, and operational agility.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Medialog 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Medialog 提供 41 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Medialog:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Medialog 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问