项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 363 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 386 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 80 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 505 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 238 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 181 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 139 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 110 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 714 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #30 8 条评价 | — |
Both Mews and Seekom are cloud-based property management systems designed to streamline hotel operations from booking to check-out. They offer core functions like reservations, booking engines, channel management, and payment processing. Where they diverge is in scale, features, and market presence. Mews has a vast ecosystem with 820 reviews and over 352 integrations, while Seekom has only 8 reviews and 5 integrations, all concentrated in smaller properties and motels.
Mews focuses on automation, guest experience, and scalability across varied hotel types, whereas Seekom caters primarily to motels and smaller independent accommodations. Given the large difference in review volume and recent feedback, which system truly delivers for your hotel’s unique needs?
If your hotel requires a scalable, modern PMS with extensive integrations and advanced automation, Mews is the stronger choice. It supports multi-property operations, boutique hotels, hostels, and luxury properties, with specialized modules like revenue management and guest CRM. Mews excels for hotels aiming to reduce manual tasks and improve guest journeys through digital check-in and messaging.
Seekom suits motels, budget properties, and small boutique hotels that need a simpler, integrated solution without the complexity of large ecosystems. If your hotel values a straightforward PMS with channel manager and booking engine combined—and you operate mainly in Europe or Oceania—Seekom may fit. However, the limited recent reviews and smaller feature set make Mews the safer, more future-proof option.
Mews scores a high 4.68/5 for ease of use, praised for its intuitive, modern interface that reduces training time and speeds daily tasks. Reviewers frequently highlight how staff quickly adopt Mews and appreciate its clear layout. Seekom lags behind at 3.69/5 ease of use, with users noting limitations in functionality and a less streamlined UI.
Onboarding ratings are also higher for Mews (4.37/5) versus Seekom (3.75/5), reflecting smoother implementation and training. Mews users report rapid staff adoption with minimal disruption, while Seekom customers mention wishes for more personal visits and improved system feedback.
Edge: Mews PMS by Mews.
Mews offers 57 unique features compared to Seekom’s 31, highlighting a broader and deeper feature set. Mews includes advanced revenue management, guest CRM, integrated payment terminals, digital registration, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, mobile apps for housekeeping, and a guest app with messaging. It also has a drag-and-drop tape chart, automated night audit, and centralized user management.
Seekom covers essentials like channel management, a booking engine, housekeeping, POS, and group booking but lacks the scale of integrations and specialized tools Mews provides. Both have revenue management modules and guest communication, but Mews’ extensive marketplace with over 1,000 integrations far outnumbers Seekom’s 5 partners.
Edge: Mews PMS by Mews.
Seekom’s customer support rating is marginally higher at 4.38/5 compared to Mews’ 4.26/5, with users praising the helpfulness and responsiveness of Seekom’s support team. However, Mews still receives strong marks and is lauded for implementation assistance and ongoing training resources like Mews University.
Mews reviews mention occasional delays or chat-based limitations but highlight proactive, knowledgeable support that resolves issues quickly. Seekom users appreciate the personal touch but suggest improvements like enhanced promo code functionality and more intuitive system feedback.
Edge: Seekom/iBex by Seekom.
Mews dominates with 352 verified integrations, including major hotel tech partners like RateGain, Upsellguru, and FLEXIPASS keyless access. This extensive network allows your hotel to customize operations extensively and connect with revenue management, POS, and guest experience tools.
Seekom has only 5 verified partners, offering a much narrower connectivity scope mostly suited to basic channel management and booking platforms. Both share five common integrations, but Mews’ marketplace is vastly more comprehensive, which future-proofs your hotel tech stack.
Edge: Mews PMS by Mews.
Overall, Mews has an HT Score of 99.33 and an average rating of 4.62/5 across 820 reviews, including 61 in the last six months. Seekom holds a higher average rating of 4.86/5 but from only 8 reviews, none recent. The volume and freshness of Mews’ reviews provide stronger data confidence.
Mews is favored by boutique hotels (4.51/5 from 449 reviews), hostels (4.85/5 from 151), and budget hotels (4.82/5 from 208), covering a broad segment range. Seekom’s small user base is concentrated in motels (67%) with a 4.83/5 rating from 7 reviews and limited data for other segments.
Edge: Mews PMS by Mews.
Mews has a base price of $900 with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing, and no implementation fee. Seekom offers a more affordable base price of $500 with similar pricing structure details.
Neither system offers a free trial. Mews’ higher base price reflects its extensive features and integrations, while Seekom’s lower cost suits smaller properties with simpler needs.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is scale and depth. Mews provides a mature, feature-rich, and highly integrated cloud PMS designed for hotels seeking operational efficiency and an elevated guest experience. Seekom offers a simpler, more affordable system aimed at smaller motels and budget accommodations.
Choose Mews if you need extensive automation, a broad partner marketplace, and support for diverse property types including boutique hotels and hostels. Mews also leads in recent user feedback and ease of use, ensuring your team adapts quickly.
Seekom fits smaller, budget-focused properties that want an all-in-one PMS and channel management system with strong customer support at a lower entry price. However, its limited integrations and lack of recent reviews make Mews the safer long-term investment.
Mews PMS by Mews is the stronger pick for most hotels due to its proven market presence, feature set, and ongoing innovation.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。
用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。
用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。
报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Seekom/iBex 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 352 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Seekom/iBex 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Seekom/iBex:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 99,Seekom 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐