HotelTime PMS vs. Mews PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 October 29, 2026  ·  已分析 1,506 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,506 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

HOTELTIME 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module.

Mews 表现出色 在 易用性和直观界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,506 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
92
99
推荐可能性
93%
92%
易用性
4.7/5
4.7/5
客户支持
4.7/5
4.3/5
性价比
4.5/5
4.4/5
起始价格 起价 $600/月 起价 $900/月
经验证的评价 563 943

HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,506 条经验证的评价后,HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 工作流程效率与易用性, 支持与响应速度, 预订与房态管理,而 Mews 用户则强调 易用性和直观界面, 客户支持与培训, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
优点
+ 工作流程效率与易用性 ▾
+ 易用性和直观界面 ▾
+ 支持与响应速度 ▾
+ 客户支持与培训 ▾
+ 预订与房态管理 ▾
+ 自动化与工作流程效率 ▾
+ 报告与分析 ▾
+ 集成与开放API ▾
缺点
− 账单、发票和会计 ▾
− 账单、发票与支付 ▾
− 客人档案与客人数据管理 ▾
− 多酒店和集团管理 ▾
− 房价管理与定价控制 ▾
− 客房服务和房态 ▾

HOTELTIME 对比 Mews:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #5 224 条评价 #3 363 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #3 238 条评价 #1 386 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ #3 51 条评价 #2 80 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ #8 7 条评价 #3 49 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
精品酒店 ▾ #4 248 条评价 #2 505 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ #3 246 条评价 #5 238 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ #4 145 条评价 #2 181 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ #4 49 条评价 #1 139 条评价

按区域

细分市场 HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
北美 ▾ #52 4 条评价 #8 110 条评价
欧洲 ▾ #2 384 条评价 #1 714 条评价
亚太 ▾ #5 117 条评价 #10 17 条评价
中东 ▾ #1 21 条评价 #30 8 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right PMS can transform your hotel operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS and Mews PMS both aim to streamline these areas, but differences in scale, features, and recent reviews reveal which may better suit your needs.

HotelTime, with a solid European presence and over 430 reviews, offers a comprehensive system for properties of all sizes, especially resorts and groups. Mews, with nearly 760 reviews and a global reach, is favored by modern hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations, and scalable cloud-based solutions.

Are you looking for a mature platform with proven stability or a dynamic, innovative system that adapts quickly? The answer depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech ambitions.

Is HotelTime or Mews Better for Hotels?

Both products serve the same purpose: managing reservations, front-office tasks, and operational workflows. However, HotelTime's stronghold is in Europe and the Middle East, with a focus on larger properties and chains, while Mews is more prevalent in North America and Asia Pacific, favored by boutique and independent hotels.

HotelTime’s recent reviews are fewer—27 in the last six months—limiting insight into its current performance, whereas Mews’s 98 recent reviews provide a clearer picture of ongoing improvements and user satisfaction.

HotelTime scores slightly higher in customer support and onboarding, with 4.73/5 and 4.63/5 respectively, versus Mews’s 4.27/5 and 4.39/5. Yet, Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 still indicates strong user confidence.

Do you prioritize extensive regional support or a rapidly evolving platform? The data suggests Mews’s recent momentum and larger review base make it the more reliable choice today.

HotelTime vs Mews: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a fully featured, all-in-one PMS with deep integration into spa, wellness, and complex revenue streams, HotelTime is a strong candidate. It’s suitable for large resorts and groups that want a mature platform with extensive capabilities and regional support.

On the other hand, if you require a flexible, innovative system with over 50 features, including guest messaging, multi-currency, and a broad marketplace of third-party integrations, Mews is better. Its user-friendly interface and cloud-based scalability appeal to boutique hotels, independents, and properties aiming for operational automation.

For hotels prioritizing robust third-party integrations, Mews’s 336 verified partners outweigh HotelTime’s 58, making it more adaptable to evolving tech stacks. Conversely, HotelTime might be preferable if your hotel values a highly localized solution with strong support in Europe and Middle East.

Is HotelTime or Mews Easier to Use?

User reviews rate Mews at 4.7/5 for ease of use, citing its modern, intuitive interface that minimizes training time and simplifies daily tasks. HotelTime’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.66/5, with some users noting initial complexity due to its extensive modules but recognizing that familiarity improves efficiency.

HotelTime’s onboarding experience averages 4.63/5, praised for personalized support, whereas Mews’s onboarding rating of 4.39/5 reflects some initial setup challenges, especially in larger multi-property implementations.

Support ratings favor HotelTime, with 4.73/5, praised for responsiveness and expertise, while Mews’s 4.27/5 indicates room for improvement but still a generally positive experience.

Edge: Mews

Which Has Better Features: HotelTime or Mews?

HotelTime boasts 50 shared features plus a unique Spa & Wellness module, enabling comprehensive management of additional hotel services. In contrast, Mews offers 50 shared features with 9 exclusive functionalities, including guest apps, guest messaging, automated assignments, shift planning, and SOC2 compliance.

HotelTime’s specialization in wellness and resort features may appeal to larger properties, but Mews’s extensive marketplace—over 1,000 integrations—enables highly customizable workflows.

When considering features like multi-lingual, multi-currency, and guest communication, Mews’s broader set of exclusive features and integrations make it more versatile for modern hotel needs.

Edge: Mews

Which Has Better Customer Support: HotelTime or Mews?

HotelTime’s support scores higher at 4.73/5, with numerous reviews praising their responsive, knowledgeable team and dedicated onboarding. Users often highlight how HotelTime staff go above and beyond to ensure setup success and ongoing assistance.

Mews’s support, rated at 4.27/5, is generally appreciated, but some recent reviews mention occasional bugs and slower responses. However, Mews’s rapid updates and active community mitigate these issues, and its support team remains proactive.

Given the more recent reviews and overall ratings, HotelTime’s support currently holds a slight edge.

Edge: HotelTime

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotelTime or Mews?

HotelTime’s reviews are more recent (27 in the last 6 months) and consistently positive, especially among resorts and larger properties, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. Its traditional strength lies in stability and comprehensive features appreciated by established hotels.

Mews, with 98 recent reviews, has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.62/5 but dominates in user experience, innovation, and scalability, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Its reviews highlight ongoing improvements and high satisfaction with automation.

For properties seeking proven stability and regional support, HotelTime is favored. For those valuing flexibility, innovation, and a vibrant tech ecosystem, Mews is more highly rated.

Edge: Mews

How Much Do HotelTime and Mews Cost?

HotelTime’s pricing is a flat $600/month without freemium options, implementation fees, or room-based charges. Mews’s pricing is higher at $900/month, with no trial or freemium offering, but it includes a broader set of features and integrations.

Prices reflect different target markets: HotelTime’s more straightforward model suits larger properties with predictable budgets, while Mews’s premium pricing aligns with hotels seeking advanced automation and extensive third-party connections.

Your decision may hinge on your budget and the value you place on features versus cost.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelTime?

  • Hotels that want a fully integrated, regional-focused PMS with dedicated wellness and spa modules.
  • Large resorts or groups managing multiple properties across Europe, Middle East, or Asia Pacific.
  • Hotels prioritizing stability, comprehensive reporting, and strong customer support.
  • Properties needing automation in revenue management, invoicing, and wellness services.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, solely budget-focused, or looking for rapid, cloud-native innovation.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews?

  • Boutique, independent, or lifestyle hotels seeking a modern, flexible platform.
  • Hotels looking to scale operations with extensive third-party integrations via the Mews Marketplace.
  • Properties that prioritize automation, contactless guest experiences, and real-time data.
  • Hotels aiming for a global presence, with multi-currency and multi-lingual support.

Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions with limited Mews support or requires complex, bespoke module customization not yet available through integrations.

Mews vs HotelTime: The Bottom Line for Hotels

HotelTime offers a mature, highly capable system ideal for large resorts, chains, and properties needing comprehensive wellness and revenue modules. Its regional strength and customer support make it suitable for established operators prioritizing stability and local support.

Mews is best suited for modern hotels, boutique independents, and properties seeking a scalable, innovative platform with extensive integrations and automation. Its recent reviews and feature set favor hotels pushing toward digital transformation and guest-centric experiences.

If your hotel values a proven track record with regional support and extensive modules, HotelTime is the choice. If you want a future-proof, flexible solution that can grow and adapt quickly, Mews is the clear winner.

HotelTime PMS 和 Mews PMS 的价格是多少?

酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
起始价格 起价 $600/月 起价 $900/月

功能对比:HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 HOTELTIME HOTELTIME Mews Mews
▾ 会计与金融
100%
100%
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
多币种
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
自动夜间审计
▾ 营销与电子商务
88%
100%
访客通信(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
客人资料
客户关系管理
礼品卡
频道管理员
预订引擎
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 管理和配置
75%
75%
集中的用户和角色管理
多种语言
基于云
在前提
▾ 用户管理
50%
100%
访客通信(短信)
客人资料
集中消息传递
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 前台
84%
92%
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用
自动夜间审计
日历视图
多种语言
任务管理
自动提醒
客人资料
平板电脑/自助服务终端值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
▾ 群组管理
100%
100%
组功能
自动空间优化
▾ 宾客体验
78%
100%
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用
网上值机
在线结帐
来宾消息
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
身份证扫描和注册预填
大堂售货亭
▾ 家政
100%
100%
管家模块
家政移动应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班计划
员工信息
在线结帐
▾ 付款
100%
100%
集成支付终端和读卡器
直接计费
多币种
交付过程
付款请求
▾ 预订管理
100%
100%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
▾ 收入管理
100%
100%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
收益管理模块
基本定价
▾ 税务与合规
75%
100%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR
SOC2 投诉
税务配置
▾ 支持与培训
100%
100%
在线 24/7 支持
▾ 食品与饮料
100%
100%
EPoS
▾ 温泉
100%
0%
水疗和健康模块

实际成果:HOTELTIME 对比 Mews(按业务目标)

我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
HOTELTIME HOTELTIME

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Episode Tbilisi 小型
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
提高运营效率
HOTELTIME Chateau Mcely 小型
+ Accommodation is run by HotelTime PMS, restaurant by HotelTime Vento ePOS and spa services by Hoteltime Libero software. One platform takes care of everything, systems are perfectly integrated.
+ Being cloud-based, HotelTime Solutions allows the chateau's team to offer the best possible services because they have access to all the data they need from anywhere which means they can see what their guests like and need anytime and make the best informed decisions.
+ A luxurious boutique property needs proper information to be run smoothly and wisely. HotelTime robust reports offer everything management and staff need.

"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."

Petra Horáková
Petra Horáková
Deputy Managing Director
Mews Aplend Apartments 中型
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
改善宾客体验
HOTELTIME Nezvalova Archa 小型
+ Thanks to HotelTime Solutions and third-party systems integrated with it the hotel automated accommodation services which means the guests are autonomous and the hotel needs minimum staff.
+ If guests want anything to eat/drink, they simply enter the restaurant, select the food and/or drinks, mark everything at the self-service cash registers and pay. It is also possible to cook there
+ Whole operation works smoothly, all the guests need is a mobile phone through which they order accommodation, pay for it, unlock all doors, pay for food and check in/out.

"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."

Daniel Šram
Daniel Šram
Operational Manager, Nezvalova Archa
Mews Leven Manchester 小型
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

HOTELTIME 对比 Mews:总结

HOTELTIME
HOTELTIME
4.6/5 来自 563 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

工作流程效率与易用性 72% 正面

评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。

支持与响应速度 95% 正面

用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。

预订与房态管理 70% 正面

评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

账单、发票和会计 43% 负面

许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。

客人档案与客人数据管理 62% 负面

一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。

排名更高的方面

赌场酒店 #5 vs #7
豪华酒店 #3 vs #5
度假酒店 #4 vs #7
AE #1 vs #10

独特功能

水疗和健康模块
4.7/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 60 个集成
查看资料
Mews
Mews
4.6/5 来自 943 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

易用性和直观界面 83% 正面

最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。

客户支持与培训 70% 正面

用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。

自动化与工作流程效率 82% 正面

用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

账单、发票与支付 54% 负面

账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。

报告与分析 62% 负面

报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #1 vs #3
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 vs #5
超大型(200+ 间客房) #3 vs #8
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #12 vs #17

独特功能

多种语言 多币种 访客通信(短信) 集中消息传递 访客应用
4.7/5 易用性 4.3/5 客户支持 352 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

客户支持 HOTELTIME 4.7 vs 4.3 (+0.5)

关于 HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS 的常见问题

HotelTime PMS 能否替代 Mews PMS?

这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

HotelTime PMS 或 Mews PMS 是否提供免费方案?

HotelTime PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 HotelTime PMS 和 Mews PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息