Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
HotelTime PMS vs. Mews PMS:
哪个更适合您？
摘要
我们分析了 1,436 条经验证的酒店从业者评价，比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究，以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项：
HOTELTIME 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ，拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS 的优缺点是什么？
在分析了 1,436 条经验证的评价后，HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics，而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
HOTELTIME 对比 Mews：按酒店细分市场排名
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型（10-24 间客房） ▾ | #5 219 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型（25-74 间客房） ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型（75-199 间客房） ▾ | #2 46 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 239 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 241 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 143 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #52 4 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 111 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
The Decision
Choosing the right PMS can transform your hotel operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS and Mews PMS both aim to streamline these areas, but differences in scale, features, and recent reviews reveal which may better suit your needs.
HotelTime, with a solid European presence and over 430 reviews, offers a comprehensive system for properties of all sizes, especially resorts and groups. Mews, with nearly 760 reviews and a global reach, is favored by modern hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations, and scalable cloud-based solutions.
Are you looking for a mature platform with proven stability or a dynamic, innovative system that adapts quickly? The answer depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech ambitions.
Is HotelTime or Mews Better for Hotels?
Both products serve the same purpose: managing reservations, front-office tasks, and operational workflows. However, HotelTime's stronghold is in Europe and the Middle East, with a focus on larger properties and chains, while Mews is more prevalent in North America and Asia Pacific, favored by boutique and independent hotels.
HotelTime’s recent reviews are fewer—27 in the last six months—limiting insight into its current performance, whereas Mews’s 98 recent reviews provide a clearer picture of ongoing improvements and user satisfaction.
HotelTime scores slightly higher in customer support and onboarding, with 4.73/5 and 4.63/5 respectively, versus Mews’s 4.27/5 and 4.39/5. Yet, Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 still indicates strong user confidence.
Do you prioritize extensive regional support or a rapidly evolving platform? The data suggests Mews’s recent momentum and larger review base make it the more reliable choice today.
HotelTime vs Mews: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel needs a fully featured, all-in-one PMS with deep integration into spa, wellness, and complex revenue streams, HotelTime is a strong candidate. It’s suitable for large resorts and groups that want a mature platform with extensive capabilities and regional support.
On the other hand, if you require a flexible, innovative system with over 50 features, including guest messaging, multi-currency, and a broad marketplace of third-party integrations, Mews is better. Its user-friendly interface and cloud-based scalability appeal to boutique hotels, independents, and properties aiming for operational automation.
For hotels prioritizing robust third-party integrations, Mews’s 336 verified partners outweigh HotelTime’s 58, making it more adaptable to evolving tech stacks. Conversely, HotelTime might be preferable if your hotel values a highly localized solution with strong support in Europe and Middle East.
Is HotelTime or Mews Easier to Use?
User reviews rate Mews at 4.7/5 for ease of use, citing its modern, intuitive interface that minimizes training time and simplifies daily tasks. HotelTime’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.66/5, with some users noting initial complexity due to its extensive modules but recognizing that familiarity improves efficiency.
HotelTime’s onboarding experience averages 4.63/5, praised for personalized support, whereas Mews’s onboarding rating of 4.39/5 reflects some initial setup challenges, especially in larger multi-property implementations.
Support ratings favor HotelTime, with 4.73/5, praised for responsiveness and expertise, while Mews’s 4.27/5 indicates room for improvement but still a generally positive experience.
Edge: Mews
Which Has Better Features: HotelTime or Mews?
HotelTime boasts 50 shared features plus a unique Spa & Wellness module, enabling comprehensive management of additional hotel services. In contrast, Mews offers 50 shared features with 9 exclusive functionalities, including guest apps, guest messaging, automated assignments, shift planning, and SOC2 compliance.
HotelTime’s specialization in wellness and resort features may appeal to larger properties, but Mews’s extensive marketplace—over 1,000 integrations—enables highly customizable workflows.
When considering features like multi-lingual, multi-currency, and guest communication, Mews’s broader set of exclusive features and integrations make it more versatile for modern hotel needs.
Edge: Mews
Which Has Better Customer Support: HotelTime or Mews?
HotelTime’s support scores higher at 4.73/5, with numerous reviews praising their responsive, knowledgeable team and dedicated onboarding. Users often highlight how HotelTime staff go above and beyond to ensure setup success and ongoing assistance.
Mews’s support, rated at 4.27/5, is generally appreciated, but some recent reviews mention occasional bugs and slower responses. However, Mews’s rapid updates and active community mitigate these issues, and its support team remains proactive.
Given the more recent reviews and overall ratings, HotelTime’s support currently holds a slight edge.
Edge: HotelTime
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotelTime or Mews?
HotelTime’s reviews are more recent (27 in the last 6 months) and consistently positive, especially among resorts and larger properties, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. Its traditional strength lies in stability and comprehensive features appreciated by established hotels.
Mews, with 98 recent reviews, has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.62/5 but dominates in user experience, innovation, and scalability, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Its reviews highlight ongoing improvements and high satisfaction with automation.
For properties seeking proven stability and regional support, HotelTime is favored. For those valuing flexibility, innovation, and a vibrant tech ecosystem, Mews is more highly rated.
Edge: Mews
How Much Do HotelTime and Mews Cost?
HotelTime’s pricing is a flat $600/month without freemium options, implementation fees, or room-based charges. Mews’s pricing is higher at $900/month, with no trial or freemium offering, but it includes a broader set of features and integrations.
Prices reflect different target markets: HotelTime’s more straightforward model suits larger properties with predictable budgets, while Mews’s premium pricing aligns with hotels seeking advanced automation and extensive third-party connections.
Your decision may hinge on your budget and the value you place on features versus cost.
What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelTime?
- Hotels that want a fully integrated, regional-focused PMS with dedicated wellness and spa modules.
- Large resorts or groups managing multiple properties across Europe, Middle East, or Asia Pacific.
- Hotels prioritizing stability, comprehensive reporting, and strong customer support.
- Properties needing automation in revenue management, invoicing, and wellness services.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, solely budget-focused, or looking for rapid, cloud-native innovation.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews?
- Boutique, independent, or lifestyle hotels seeking a modern, flexible platform.
- Hotels looking to scale operations with extensive third-party integrations via the Mews Marketplace.
- Properties that prioritize automation, contactless guest experiences, and real-time data.
- Hotels aiming for a global presence, with multi-currency and multi-lingual support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions with limited Mews support or requires complex, bespoke module customization not yet available through integrations.
Mews vs HotelTime: The Bottom Line for Hotels
HotelTime offers a mature, highly capable system ideal for large resorts, chains, and properties needing comprehensive wellness and revenue modules. Its regional strength and customer support make it suitable for established operators prioritizing stability and local support.
Mews is best suited for modern hotels, boutique independents, and properties seeking a scalable, innovative platform with extensive integrations and automation. Its recent reviews and feature set favor hotels pushing toward digital transformation and guest-centric experiences.
If your hotel values a proven track record with regional support and extensive modules, HotelTime is the choice. If you want a future-proof, flexible solution that can grow and adapt quickly, Mews is the clear winner.
实际成果：HOTELTIME 对比 Mews（按业务目标）
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
HOTELTIME 对比 Mews：总结
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏，但一些评论指出，延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验，确保随时都能获得帮助，特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能，但一些评论指出，它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察，尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
关于 HotelTime PMS 与 Mews PMS 的常见问题
HotelTime PMS 能否替代 Mews PMS？
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能，但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelTime PMS 或 Mews PMS 是否提供免费方案？
HotelTime PMS：否。Mews PMS：否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HTR 如何评估和排名 HotelTime PMS 和 Mews PMS？
HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92，Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何？ 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？ 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？ 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？ 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
酒店从业者还在阅读哪些 物业管理系统 对比？
探索更多基于经验证酒店从业者评价的一对一对比。
获取个性化的产品推荐
产品推荐顾问
