The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,282 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) .
基于 HTR 上 1,282 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 887 | 395 |
在分析了 1,282 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Mews PMS and ThinkReservations PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both tackle core tasks like reservations, guest management, and integrations, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and user experience.
Mews caters to a broad spectrum of properties, from boutique hotels to large chains, offering extensive automation and customization. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is tailored for small to medium-sized hotels seeking straightforward, reliable management with a focus on revenue enhancement and OTA integration.
Which product aligns better with your strategic goals — scalability and automation or simplicity and cost-efficiency?
Mews and ThinkReservations aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches differ markedly. Mews’s cloud-native platform offers deep automation, a vast partner network, and advanced features that support complex, multi-property management.
ThinkReservations emphasizes ease of use, fast onboarding, and seamless OTA integration, making it ideal for small hotels prioritizing straightforward operations and rapid setup. Does your hotel need a flexible, feature-rich system or a simple, reliable platform that gets the job done quickly?
While Mews’s recent reviews indicate it handles large, diverse portfolios well, ThinkReservations’s recent user feedback shows high satisfaction among small properties for its intuitive design and support. Your decision should consider whether scalability or simplicity is your priority.
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, multi-lingual system with extensive automation, Mews is the better fit. It’s well-suited for properties aiming to expand, automate complex workflows, and leverage a marketplace of integrations.
If your hotel requires a straightforward, cost-effective PMS with reliable OTA connectivity and strong support, ThinkReservations is the way to go. It’s ideal for small to medium properties that want a system that’s easy to implement and manage without sacrificing essential features.
Property size, growth plans, and operational complexity should guide your choice: go with Mews for scalability and automation, or ThinkReservations for simplicity and quick deployment.
Mews’s user interface is modern and highly rated, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score based on 758 reviews, but some users mention a learning curve due to its extensive features. Its onboarding process averages 4.39/5, and recent reviews highlight its intuitive design for tech-savvy teams.
ThinkReservations’s interface scores slightly higher at 4.82/5, with a smaller user base of 356 reviews, emphasizing its straightforward, easy-to-navigate design. Its onboarding is rated 4.73/5, with recent reviews praising the platform’s simplicity and excellent support.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Mews offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, a guest CRM, revenue management, integrated ID scanners, and a centralized messaging system. These cater to larger, diverse properties needing tailored workflows.
ThinkReservations provides a solid set of 39 features, all included in its core offering, focusing on OTA integration, automated messaging, and upselling tools. It lacks some advanced features of Mews but covers essential operational needs for small to medium hotels.
Edge: Mews.
ThinkReservations’s recent reviews frequently commend its support, with a 4.82/5 rating and comments like “support is fantastic,” and “very accessible and helpful.” Support is available 24/7, and onboarding is described as seamless.
Mews’s support score is 4.27/5, with some users citing occasional bugs and slower resolution times, though many appreciate their proactive issue handling. Its support has improved significantly but remains less consistent than ThinkReservations.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major OTAs, channel managers, and tech tools, with 10 shared integrations with ThinkReservations. Notable exclusive integrations include Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing.
ThinkReservations has only 16 verified partners, focusing primarily on OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and Booking.com, with a few unique integrations such as HotelTonight and RemoteLock. Its smaller partner ecosystem limits flexibility for complex setups.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall review score is 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, with a recent update of 98 reviews in the last 6 months. Hoteliers across diverse segments, especially boutique and independent hotels, rate it highly for its automation and scalability.
ThinkReservations’s overall score is 4.88/5 based on 356 reviews, with 4 recent reviews strengthening its reputation among small and boutique properties. Its simplicity and support are often highlighted positively.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities. The platform’s cost may be justified by its extensive features and integrations for larger properties or portfolios.
ThinkReservations costs $500/month, also without a free trial, offering a more affordable option suited for smaller properties seeking essential features with less complexity. Its pricing aligns with its target market of small to medium hotels.
Not ideal if you want a simple, budget-friendly solution or have minimal automation needs.
Not ideal if you operate a large chain or require extensive customization and advanced features.
Mews excels in automating complex operations, supporting large portfolios, and providing broad integrations, making it suitable for growth-oriented, multi-property hotels. Its extensive feature set justifies its higher price point for hotels with more sophisticated needs.
ThinkReservations stands out for its user-friendly design, rapid onboarding, and excellent support, making it a smart choice for small to medium hotels prioritizing simplicity and fast deployment. Its limited but focused feature set is enough for properties looking for reliable operational management without the complexity.
If your hotel needs advanced functionality, automation, and scalability, choose Mews. For straightforward management, quick setup, and strong support, ThinkReservations is the clear winner.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mews PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问