项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 945 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Mews 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合汽车旅馆住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有客户关系管理以及客人资料等独家功能。
Septeo Hospitality 凭借水疗和健康模块等独家功能脱颖而出。
基于 HTR 上 945 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 945 | 0 |
在分析了 945 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 易用性和直观界面, 客户支持与培训, 自动化与工作流程效率,而 Septeo Hospitality 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与开放API
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票与支付
▾
|
|
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
−
多酒店和集团管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 363 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 386 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 80 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 505 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 238 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 181 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 139 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 110 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 714 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #30 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Ulyses by Septeo Hospitality hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and strategic goals. Mews is a cloud-native property management system tailored for scalable, modern hospitality, while Ulyses aims to be an all-in-one platform managing diverse hotel services with a focus on integrated operations and guest experiences. Both aim to streamline operations, but their approaches are markedly different.
Mews offers a comprehensive, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, while Ulyses provides a flexible, service-oriented platform that manages a wide array of hotel activities beyond just room bookings. So, which product aligns better with your hotel’s current priorities?
Mews is designed to serve a wide spectrum of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with a focus on operational automation and guest experience enhancement. It addresses core PMS functionalities—reservations, billing, housekeeping—and excels in integrations, automation, and user-friendly design. Ulyses, on the other hand, leans toward managing multiple hotel services—spa, activities, retail—within a single interface, promising increased productivity and personalized guest journeys.
While Mews boasts a high score of 99.8 on the HT Score and over 760 recent reviews, Ulyses has no available reviews or ratings, limiting insight into user satisfaction. Given Mews’s proven track record and extensive support network, it’s the safer choice for hotel operations seeking clarity and confidence.
Do you need a robust PMS with extensive third-party integrations, or a versatile platform managing multiple services in a unified way?
If your hotel requires a powerful, cloud-based PMS primarily for reservation, billing, housekeeping, and guest management, go with Mews. It’s suited for diverse properties, especially those aiming to scale or enhance operational efficiency, supported by a broad partner network and proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel’s focus is on managing a variety of services—restaurants, spa, activities, retail—and delivering elevated, personalized guest experiences through a single platform, Ulyses might fit better. Its adaptability to different hotel activities is designed to streamline service management, though without recent user reviews, its real-world performance remains less certain.
In summary, for a hotel needing a proven PMS with a large ecosystem, choose Mews. For a hotel prioritizing multi-service management with a flexible interface, consider Ulyses.
Mews scores 4.69 out of 5 for ease of use, with many users describing its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Support resources like Mews University and positive review quotes reinforce its user-friendliness, even for teams new to PMS technology.
Ulyses, lacking recent review data, does not publicly showcase ease-of-use ratings or user feedback, making it difficult to compare. Based on its web-based, customizable design, it’s likely adaptable but without concrete user insights, Mews holds a clear advantage here.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 43 shared features plus 16 unique to it, including multi-lingual support, guest CRM, online support, integrated CRS, mobile app, ID scanning, task and shift management, and SOC2 compliance. Its extensive feature set supports seamless hotel operations and personalized guest experiences.
Ulyses provides a broad platform for managing bookings, orders, billing, and communication across hotel services, but it has only one unique feature: spa & wellness module. It’s designed for flexibility but lacks the depth and breadth of dedicated PMS functionalities compared to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting structured onboarding, responsive support teams, and positive experiences. Users appreciate its proactive support and quick bug resolution, which are critical during implementation and daily operations.
Ulyses, with no recent reviews or ratings available, provides limited insight into support quality. Without customer feedback, Mews’s established reputation for support makes it the safer, more reliable option.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 352 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and ancillary services. Its open API and extensive marketplace—over 1,000 integrations—allow hotels to craft a tailored tech ecosystem.
Ulyses offers only 13 verified partners, with no mention of a broad marketplace or API openness. For hotels seeking flexibility and expansive integration options, Mews significantly outperforms Ulyses.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s user reviews are plentiful, recent, and consistently positive across various hotel types—boutiques, hostels, independents—with a 4.63/5 rating and 92% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, automation, and support.
Ulyses has no available user ratings or recent reviews, limiting insight into user satisfaction. Given Mews’s demonstrated high scores and active community, it is clearly the more highly-rated platform.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at a base fee of $900/month, with no free plan or trial, indicating a premium but transparent model. Ulyses does not publicly disclose pricing, which may suggest custom quotes or less transparency.
If budget transparency is crucial, Mews provides clear cost expectations; Ulyses’s pricing remains uncertain, potentially complicating budget planning.
Not ideal if you operate a very small property with minimal tech needs or if your budget limits high-cost systems.
Not ideal if your hotel’s core is room reservations and operations; lack of recent reviews makes support and reliability less certain.
Mews is a proven, feature-rich PMS trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with extensive integrations, high user ratings, and recent reviews confirming its effectiveness. It’s best suited for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable PMS that enhances guest experience and operational efficiency.
Ulyses offers a flexible, multi-service platform for hotels managing diverse activities, with potential for personalized guest journeys. However, the absence of recent customer reviews and limited feature transparency make it a less certain choice without further evaluation.
If your hotel needs a dependable, highly-rated PMS with broad ecosystem support, choose Mews. If managing multiple services with a unified platform is your priority and you’re comfortable with less public validation, Ulyses could fit—though caution is advised due to limited recent feedback.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking proven performance and peace of mind, Mews stands out as the safer, more reliable investment.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。
用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。
用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。
报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Ulyses (by Septeo Hospitality) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 352 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Ulyses (by Septeo Hospitality) 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Ulyses (by Septeo Hospitality):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 99,Septeo Hospitality 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐