The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mister Booking 表现出色 .
Preno 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 160 |
在分析了 160 条经验证的评价后,Mister Booking 用户最看重其 ,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a solution that streamlines reservations, minimizes errors, and integrates well with existing tools. Mister Booking and Preno both aim to serve this purpose but diverge significantly in their offerings, support, and market presence. Mister Booking, with no recent reviews and a low overall rating, falls short in user satisfaction, while Preno boasts a high review count, recent positive feedback, and a strong reputation. Which system truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both Mister Booking and Preno are designed to manage hotel operations, but their scope and current market confidence differ. Mister Booking presents itself as an all-in-one PMS but suffers from a total lack of recent reviews, leaving its reliability and user experience unverified. Preno, on the other hand, has 144 reviews—most recent—and a high NPS score of 9.53/10, indicating strong customer satisfaction.
While Mister Booking claims to simplify booking management and real-time updates, the absence of updated user feedback makes it difficult to assess its actual performance. Preno’s latest reviews highlight its ease of use, seamless integration with tools like Xero and SiteMinder, and dedicated support, making it a more reliable choice. Do you want to bet on an untested system or go with proven user satisfaction?
If your hotel requires an intuitive, cloud-based PMS with integrated channel management, billing, and guest communication, Preno is the clear choice. Its 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews and recent positive feedback make it suitable for mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and motivated hoteliers seeking efficiency.
If your hotel specifically needs a system with a broad scope but less emphasis on recent performance or reviews, Mister Booking might seem appealing. However, given its zero reviews and poor rating, it’s unlikely to meet the expectations of hotels that value proven support and reliable features. For hotels seeking certainty and features proven in the market, Preno remains the better pick.
Preno excels in user experience, earning a 4.78/5 rating based on recent reviews that praise its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Customers highlight how quickly staff can adapt, reducing onboarding time and training costs. Its cloud-based architecture and mobile app further streamline daily tasks for your team.
Mister Booking, with a 0/5 score and no recent reviews, provides no credible data on usability. Its lack of user feedback suggests potential usability issues or untested deployment. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 distinct features—including integrated channel management, guest CRM, revenue management, online support, and automation tools—that Mister Booking does not list or appear to provide. Features like real-time status updates, automated night audits, and a native booking engine make Preno a comprehensive solution.
Mister Booking, with no unique features documented, seems to lack the breadth and depth that modern hotel operators expect. This significant feature gap puts Preno ahead for hotels seeking a feature-rich, adaptable platform. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support scores an impressive 4.8/5, with recent reviews emphasizing their fast response times and helpful staff. Hoteliers mention how Preno’s support team guides them through onboarding and upgrades, making implementation less daunting.
Mister Booking’s support details are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to verify if its support meets industry standards. Given the importance of reliable support in PMS selection, Preno clearly has the edge here.
Preno boasts 17 verified integrations, including popular tools like Xero, SiteMinder, Revinate, TrustYou, and HelloShift. These integrations facilitate smoother operations across accounting, channel management, reputation, and guest communication.
Mister Booking has no verified partners, limiting its connectivity options and potential for automation. In today’s multi-tool environment, Preno’s extensive integrations are critical for operational efficiency. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, with a 4.73/5 rating and recent feedback confirming satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels and motels. Its NPS score of 9.53/10 underscores its high recommendation rate.
Mister Booking’s zero reviews and 0/5 rating place it well below market expectations, making it an unreliable choice based on current user sentiment. Hoteliers prioritize proven, positively reviewed systems—Preno fulfills this need. Edge: Preno.
Mister Booking’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting a lack of transparency or potentially an unestablished pricing model. Preno charges $800 monthly, a standard SaaS fee reflecting its comprehensive features.
While Mister Booking’s unclear costs raise questions, Preno’s transparent pricing aligns with its market presence and feature set, providing predictable operational budgeting. For clarity and value, Preno’s pricing model is preferable.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of recent reviews, Mister Booking is not recommended for most hotels seeking stability.
Not ideal if:
Preno’s rich feature set and high customer satisfaction make it suitable for most hotel types that value integration and user-friendly interfaces.
The core difference between Preno and Mister Booking is proven performance and customer satisfaction. Preno’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and feature set position it as the more reliable, well-supported choice for contemporary hotels.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven user satisfaction, go with Preno. Its integrations, support, and ease of use are documented and highly rated, making it a safe investment.
Choose Mister Booking only if you are willing to risk unverified performance or are exploring basic booking management without immediate need for advanced features or integrations. Given its lack of recent reviews and zero verified partnerships, it’s unlikely to meet modern hotel operational demands.
In summary, for hotels that want confidence, support, and a comprehensive feature suite, Preno is the clear winner. Mister Booking may appeal to very small or experimental properties, but its untested status makes it less suitable for most hotels today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Mister Booking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mister Booking 和 Preno 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Mister Booking |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mister Booking 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mister Booking 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mister Booking:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mister Booking 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问