项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 729 条经验证的评价后,HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 工作流程效率与易用性, 支持与响应速度, 预订与房态管理,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
工作流程效率与易用性
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
支持与响应速度
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
预订与房态管理
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票和会计
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
客人档案与客人数据管理
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
−
房价管理与定价控制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 224 条评价 | #14 87 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | #35 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 51 条评价 | #48 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 248 条评价 | #14 68 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 246 条评价 | #14 54 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 145 条评价 | #24 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | #9 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #52 4 条评价 | #28 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | #29 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 117 条评价 | #22 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Preno hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and where you want your property management system to excel. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, manage reservations, and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in scale, feature set, and regional presence. Given the recent reviews and user feedback, HotelTime’s more extensive feature list and larger market footprint make it a compelling choice for most hoteliers. Are you ready to dive deeper?
HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS that caters to properties of all sizes, including resorts and large groups. Preno, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, ideal for boutique hotels and smaller properties. But which one aligns better with your operational priorities?
HotelTime PMS excels in providing a broad suite of features tailored to large or complex properties. Its extensive integration capabilities, multi-currency handling, and modules like spa & wellness make it suitable for high-volume or multi-service hotels. Conversely, Preno focuses on delivering an intuitive experience with fewer features but greater ease of use, making it attractive for boutique owners or properties prioritizing simplicity.
Both systems support cloud access, but HotelTime’s advanced automation and management tools are more suited for properties with sophisticated operational needs. Preno’s streamlined interface may feel limiting for some, but it reduces training time and onboarding complexity. Which of these align better with your property’s complexity and staff expertise?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable platform capable of handling multiple departments, extensive integrations, and international operations, HotelTime is the smarter choice. Its 433 reviews and 27 recent ones with an overall score of 4.83/5 suggest strong reliability and customer satisfaction among larger properties.
If your hotel is a boutique or small property that values simple, fast onboarding and minimal training, Preno shines with a 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews, including recent positive feedback. Its ease of use, with a slightly higher UX score, makes it ideal for teams that want quick setup and straightforward management.
In summary, choose HotelTime if your hotel requires a comprehensive, multi-feature system. Opt for Preno if you prioritize simplicity, quick adoption, and cost-effectiveness.
HotelTime's user interface, rated 4.66/5, is functional but can be complex due to its extensive features, which sometimes pose a learning curve for new staff. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 indicates solid support, but some users mention initial difficulties in navigating modules or setting up integrations.
Preno, rated 4.78/5 for ease of use, offers an intuitive and clean interface praised by users for quick learning and minimal training. Its support team, rated 4.8/5, is lauded for responsiveness, which aids smooth onboarding.
Edge: Preno.
HotelTime boasts 29 shared features plus 22 exclusive features, including guest CRM, multi-currency, integrated ID scanners, online check-in, and a wellness module—features that significantly extend its capabilities for larger or integrated operations. Preno offers a single exclusive feature: automated assignments, but its core features are fewer.
HotelTime’s more extensive feature set makes it suitable for hotels with complex requirements like multiple outlets, spa services, or detailed revenue management. Preno’s streamlined feature list aligns with smaller properties that need essential PMS functions without extra complexity.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s customer support is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses and helpful support teams. Users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, though some mention that support availability could be expanded.
Preno maintains a support rating of 4.8/5, with reviewers emphasizing their quick, friendly, and helpful responses. Many reviews mention that Preno's support team is proactive and attentive, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier.
Edge: Preno.
HotelTime supports a total of 58 verified partners, including major industry players such as SiteMinder, TrustYou, and STR, plus a significant number of exclusive integrations like Profitroom and ID scanning. Preno offers 17 verified partners, with shared integrations including SiteMinder, Xero, and Goki, but lacks the extensive ecosystem HotelTime provides.
For properties that rely heavily on third-party tools or need extensive integrations, HotelTime’s broader partner network offers more flexibility. Preno’s integrations are sufficient for standard needs but may limit advanced automation.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews reflects widespread satisfaction, especially among larger properties and resorts. Recent reviews praise its comprehensive features and reliable support, with some noting room for improvement in mobile optimization.
Preno’s recent rating of 4.73/5 from 144 reviews remains strong, particularly among boutique hotels and small properties. Users love its ease of use and responsive support, though some desire more advanced reporting and mobile features.
In terms of recent feedback, HotelTime’s larger review volume and higher ratings make it the preferred choice for most hotel types.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime's pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or trial information available, indicating a premium, enterprise-grade system. Preno costs $800 per month, also without a trial, positioning it slightly higher in price but with a focus on affordability for smaller hotels.
Both systems lack free trials, so pricing should be considered alongside your property’s size and operational complexity. Larger hotels or resorts may find HotelTime’s extensive features justify the higher investment, while smaller hotels may prefer Preno’s straightforward pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with simple operations, or if budget constraints limit software expenditure.
Not ideal if your hotel demands extensive integrations, multi-department support, or detailed revenue management.
HotelTime is a robust, feature-rich platform suited for larger hotels, resorts, and groups that need extensive integrations and multi-department functionality. Its broad regional presence and strong customer support make it a versatile choice for properties with complex or multi-service operations.
Preno offers a highly user-friendly experience, ideal for boutique hotels or small properties that value simplicity and quick setup. Its focus on core PMS features and responsive support makes it a smart choice for hotels that want efficiency without added complexity.
For the majority of larger or more complex hotels, HotelTime provides more comprehensive capabilities and better integration options. Smaller or boutique properties should consider Preno for its straightforward, approachable interface and supportive team.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。
用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。
评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。
一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelTime PMS:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Preno 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐