The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 709 条经验证的评价后,HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 219 条评价 | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 46 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 239 条评价 | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 241 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 143 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #52 4 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 111 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Preno hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and where you want your property management system to excel. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, manage reservations, and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in scale, feature set, and regional presence. Given the recent reviews and user feedback, HotelTime’s more extensive feature list and larger market footprint make it a compelling choice for most hoteliers. Are you ready to dive deeper?
HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS that caters to properties of all sizes, including resorts and large groups. Preno, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, ideal for boutique hotels and smaller properties. But which one aligns better with your operational priorities?
HotelTime PMS excels in providing a broad suite of features tailored to large or complex properties. Its extensive integration capabilities, multi-currency handling, and modules like spa & wellness make it suitable for high-volume or multi-service hotels. Conversely, Preno focuses on delivering an intuitive experience with fewer features but greater ease of use, making it attractive for boutique owners or properties prioritizing simplicity.
Both systems support cloud access, but HotelTime’s advanced automation and management tools are more suited for properties with sophisticated operational needs. Preno’s streamlined interface may feel limiting for some, but it reduces training time and onboarding complexity. Which of these align better with your property’s complexity and staff expertise?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable platform capable of handling multiple departments, extensive integrations, and international operations, HotelTime is the smarter choice. Its 433 reviews and 27 recent ones with an overall score of 4.83/5 suggest strong reliability and customer satisfaction among larger properties.
If your hotel is a boutique or small property that values simple, fast onboarding and minimal training, Preno shines with a 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews, including recent positive feedback. Its ease of use, with a slightly higher UX score, makes it ideal for teams that want quick setup and straightforward management.
In summary, choose HotelTime if your hotel requires a comprehensive, multi-feature system. Opt for Preno if you prioritize simplicity, quick adoption, and cost-effectiveness.
HotelTime's user interface, rated 4.66/5, is functional but can be complex due to its extensive features, which sometimes pose a learning curve for new staff. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 indicates solid support, but some users mention initial difficulties in navigating modules or setting up integrations.
Preno, rated 4.78/5 for ease of use, offers an intuitive and clean interface praised by users for quick learning and minimal training. Its support team, rated 4.8/5, is lauded for responsiveness, which aids smooth onboarding.
Edge: Preno.
HotelTime boasts 29 shared features plus 22 exclusive features, including guest CRM, multi-currency, integrated ID scanners, online check-in, and a wellness module—features that significantly extend its capabilities for larger or integrated operations. Preno offers a single exclusive feature: automated assignments, but its core features are fewer.
HotelTime’s more extensive feature set makes it suitable for hotels with complex requirements like multiple outlets, spa services, or detailed revenue management. Preno’s streamlined feature list aligns with smaller properties that need essential PMS functions without extra complexity.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s customer support is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses and helpful support teams. Users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, though some mention that support availability could be expanded.
Preno maintains a support rating of 4.8/5, with reviewers emphasizing their quick, friendly, and helpful responses. Many reviews mention that Preno's support team is proactive and attentive, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier.
Edge: Preno.
HotelTime supports a total of 58 verified partners, including major industry players such as SiteMinder, TrustYou, and STR, plus a significant number of exclusive integrations like Profitroom and ID scanning. Preno offers 17 verified partners, with shared integrations including SiteMinder, Xero, and Goki, but lacks the extensive ecosystem HotelTime provides.
For properties that rely heavily on third-party tools or need extensive integrations, HotelTime’s broader partner network offers more flexibility. Preno’s integrations are sufficient for standard needs but may limit advanced automation.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews reflects widespread satisfaction, especially among larger properties and resorts. Recent reviews praise its comprehensive features and reliable support, with some noting room for improvement in mobile optimization.
Preno’s recent rating of 4.73/5 from 144 reviews remains strong, particularly among boutique hotels and small properties. Users love its ease of use and responsive support, though some desire more advanced reporting and mobile features.
In terms of recent feedback, HotelTime’s larger review volume and higher ratings make it the preferred choice for most hotel types.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime's pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or trial information available, indicating a premium, enterprise-grade system. Preno costs $800 per month, also without a trial, positioning it slightly higher in price but with a focus on affordability for smaller hotels.
Both systems lack free trials, so pricing should be considered alongside your property’s size and operational complexity. Larger hotels or resorts may find HotelTime’s extensive features justify the higher investment, while smaller hotels may prefer Preno’s straightforward pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with simple operations, or if budget constraints limit software expenditure.
Not ideal if your hotel demands extensive integrations, multi-department support, or detailed revenue management.
HotelTime is a robust, feature-rich platform suited for larger hotels, resorts, and groups that need extensive integrations and multi-department functionality. Its broad regional presence and strong customer support make it a versatile choice for properties with complex or multi-service operations.
Preno offers a highly user-friendly experience, ideal for boutique hotels or small properties that value simplicity and quick setup. Its focus on core PMS features and responsive support makes it a smart choice for hotels that want efficiency without added complexity.
For the majority of larger or more complex hotels, HotelTime provides more comprehensive capabilities and better integration options. Smaller or boutique properties should consider Preno for its straightforward, approachable interface and supportive team.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelTime PMS:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问