The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 135 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Revenue management module.
Sirvoy 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized Messaging and Housekeeping Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 135 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 105 |
在分析了 135 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
性价比
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #40 10 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 7 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #46 3 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #36 1 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Misterbooking by MISTER BOOKING and Sirvoy are two notable options, each catering to different segments and offering unique features. Misterbooking boasts a higher review count and more recent feedback, signaling a more active user base and current performance metrics. How do they compare across usability, features, support, and value? Let’s dive in.
Both Misterbooking and Sirvoy aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge in target audiences and feature depth. Misterbooking excels in serving independent hotels, hostels, and resorts with its scalable, fully integrated PMS that includes advanced modules like revenue management, shift planning, and ancillary revenue tracking. Sirvoy, by contrast, focuses on small to medium-sized accommodation providers such as B&Bs, hostels, and vacation rentals, emphasizing simplicity, affordability, and ease of use.
While Misterbooking offers more comprehensive features and a broader integration network, Sirvoy’s straightforward design favors quick onboarding and daily management. Given the recent surge in Sirvoy reviews—currently over 95 compared to Misterbooking’s 29—Sirvoy's user feedback provides a more current, robust perspective. Which features and support levels matter more for your hotel’s needs?
If your hotel requires a flexible, scalable PMS with modules like revenue management, shift planning, and ancillary revenue tracking, Misterbooking is the clear pick. Its strong connectivity with booking channels and customizable options suit hotel chains and larger independent properties seeking operational control.
Conversely, if your hotel is small, cost-sensitive, and prioritizes an intuitive platform to handle reservations, check-ins, and basic operations, Sirvoy is the better fit. Its low-cost structure, high user-friendliness, and excellent support service make it ideal for B&Bs, hostels, or boutique hotels seeking simplicity without sacrificing core functionality.
Your choice hinges on your property size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Does your hotel need advanced modules and extensive integrations, or a straightforward booking and management system?
Both platforms rate highly on usability, with Misterbooking earning 4.71/5 and Sirvoy 4.64/5 in ease of use. Users praise Misterbooking for its intuitive interface, despite some noting that the design could benefit from modernization, especially regarding ergonomics and page layout. Reviewers highlight that Misterbooking’s onboarding process is smooth, and staff adapt quickly, although some wish for a more modern aesthetic.
Sirvoy’s interface is celebrated for its simplicity, making daily tasks straightforward even for users new to hotel management. Support staff are quick and helpful, which enhances the user experience. Overall, both systems are easy to navigate, but Misterbooking’s broader feature set might require a slightly steeper learning curve.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking offers 33 features—more than twice Sirvoy’s 14—with standout modules including ancillary revenue tracking, shift planning, revenue management, and employee messaging. These features cater to hotels seeking detailed control and operational sophistication.
Sirvoy provides fundamental functionalities like booking management, channel management, and an integrated website builder, but lacks advanced modules such as revenue management or task management. Its features are sufficient for small properties but less tailored for complex operations.
When it comes to feature depth, Misterbooking’s broader suite gives it a decisive edge. However, Sirvoy’s focus on simplicity may suit smaller properties that don’t need extensive modules.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Both products are highly rated for support, with Misterbooking at 4.79/5 and Sirvoy at 4.85/5. Misterbooking users commend its responsiveness and helpfulness, with reviews mentioning quick support even during emergencies. Some users note that support could improve in translating interface elements, but overall, their assistance is rated highly.
Sirvoy’s support is praised for being prompt, friendly, and thorough. Reviewers frequently mention that support staff go above and beyond, with Joseph’s assistance being a common highlight. Given the slightly higher rating and recent reviews, Sirvoy’s support is marginally superior.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Misterbooking integrates with 26 verified partners, including major booking channels like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Oaky, providing extensive connectivity options. Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including Booking.com, Expedia, and Cendyn, covering core needs but with fewer unique integrations.
Both systems cover essential channels, but Misterbooking’s larger partner network offers more flexibility for hotels with complex distribution strategies. For properties seeking the widest array of integration options, Misterbooking holds the advantage.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking, with its 29 reviews, maintains a high overall rating of 4.78/5, with independent hotels, inns, and resorts particularly praising its functionality and support. Recent reviews emphasize its scalability and detailed modules, although some suggest interface improvements.
Sirvoy, despite a higher review count of 95, has a very high customer support rating but lacks detailed overall ratings—many reviews are more recent, yet the lack of detailed star ratings makes direct comparison tough. Hoteliers in small properties consistently praise Sirvoy’s ease of use and support quality.
Overall, Misterbooking’s higher, recent review activity signals a more robust, current user consensus.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking does not advertise a fixed price or freemium model, implying custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its pricing appears value-oriented, especially considering its extensive feature set.
Sirvoy charges a base fee of $200 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Additional costs may arise depending on channel partnerships and advanced modules.
For hotels seeking detailed features at flexible prices, Misterbooking’s custom approach offers more tailored value, while Sirvoy’s predictable fee simplifies budgeting for small properties.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a simple, plug-and-play solution without advanced modules.
Not ideal if you require advanced revenue management, detailed reporting, or extensive customization beyond core features.
Misterbooking offers a comprehensive, highly customizable PMS tailored to larger or more complex hotels. Its extensive modules and integrations command a higher level of operational control and scalability. If your hotel needs detailed management tools and has the resources to implement them, Misterbooking is the superior choice.
Sirvoy excels in simplicity, affordability, and ease of use, making it perfect for small hotels, B&Bs, and hostels. Its straightforward interface, high support ratings, and solid channel management make it ideal for properties prioritizing quick setup and daily ease.
If your hotel is large, complex, or aiming for growth, Misterbooking’s broader feature set and recent active reviews make it the recommended option. For small, budget-conscious properties seeking an intuitive, reliable platform, Sirvoy remains a strong contender.
In summary, Misterbooking’s recent review volume and higher overall ratings favor it for hotels needing advanced features and scalability. Sirvoy’s simplicity and support make it suitable for smaller, less complex operations. Ultimately, your choice should align with your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Misterbooking (PMS) 和 Sirvoy 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 14,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问