The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 153 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MISTER BOOKING 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
SkyTouch Technology 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 153 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 123 |
在分析了 153 条经验证的评价后,MISTER BOOKING 用户最看重其 支持质量, 可定制的功能, 人体工程学和设计,而 SkyTouch Technology 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 客户支持响应能力, 远程访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
|
+
人体工程学和设计
▾
|
+
远程访问
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
胶带图
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
可定制性限制
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
−
错误和故障
▾
|
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #33 14 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #10 72 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #21 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #23 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #40 10 条评价 | #18 47 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 7 条评价 | #22 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #46 3 条评价 | #10 45 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #22 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #7 120 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 25 条评价 | #60 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #36 1 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Misterbooking by MISTER BOOKING offers a comprehensive, multi-channel connected PMS with a strong focus on independent and small hotels, while SkyTouch Technology caters more broadly to larger, multi-property hotel groups with its cloud-based, intuitive platform. Both aim to streamline operations, but their suitability depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs.
Misterbooking scores higher in recent online reviews, with 29 reviews in the last six months and an overall rating of 4.78/5. SkyTouch, with 119 recent reviews, holds a 3.5/5 rating. Would you prefer a solution with more recent user feedback or one with a larger overall review base?
Both Misterbooking and SkyTouch address core PMS needs—reservation management, guest communication, reporting, and integrations—yet they diverge in their target audiences and feature focus. Misterbooking emphasizes customization, multi-currency support, and automated guest messaging, making it attractive for independent hotels, inns, and resorts seeking flexibility. Conversely, SkyTouch offers a user-friendly, cloud-based system with detailed reporting and rate management, mainly suited for larger, multi-property hotel groups.
While Misterbooking boasts 14 unique features and a highly rated interface, SkyTouch provides 8 exclusive features, including guest profiles and integrated CRS. Do these feature sets align with your hotel’s operational complexity and growth plans?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable solution with extensive integrations, multi-currency capabilities, and advanced guest communication tools, Misterbooking is the better fit, especially for independent hotels and resorts. Its high overall rating, strong recent reviews, and feature depth support a diverse range of hotel types seeking operational control.
However, if your hotel or group values an intuitive cloud-based platform with robust reporting, rate management, and easy onboarding for staff, SkyTouch is preferable. It’s especially suitable for larger groups or properties in North America looking for straightforward management despite some reported bugs and limited customization. The decision hinges on your operational scale and feature priorities.
Edge: Misterbooking
Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, with Misterbooking at 4.71/5 and SkyTouch at 4.64/5. Misterbooking’s interface is praised for its flexibility and ability to view reservations by month, with some users noting that combining certain functions on the same page could improve ergonomics.
SkyTouch’s interface is lauded as intuitive, enabling rapid staff onboarding and quick reservations management. However, recurring complaints about bugs and system glitches slightly impact ease of use. Which platform aligns better with your staff’s tech proficiency?
Edge: Misterbooking
Misterbooking packs 14 features exclusive to its platform, such as multi-currency handling, guest messaging, online check-in, GDPR compliance, and automated reminders, making it more feature-rich for independent hotels. SkyTouch offers 8 unique features like guest profiles, automated night audit, and EPoS, which cater well to larger properties with multiple amenities and operational layers.
While both systems share 19 features, Misterbooking stands out with its automation, guest communication, and payment request capabilities. For hotels prioritizing customization and guest engagement, Misterbooking holds the edge.
Edge: Misterbooking
Misterbooking’s support ratings are higher at 4.79/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and a dedicated support team. Customers appreciate their responsiveness, especially when resolving connectivity or feature issues.
SkyTouch’s support scores 4.5/5, with users describing their team as professional but noting occasional delays and unresolved long-standing bugs. For hotels where support responsiveness is critical, Misterbooking’s customer service has a slight advantage.
Edge: Misterbooking
SkyTouch offers more verified partners, with 33 compared to Misterbooking’s 26, sharing common integrations like SiteMinder and Duetto. Misterbooking’s unique integrations include platforms like Spotpilot and Lybra Tech, while SkyTouch’s exclusive partners include Chargerback Lost & Found and GuestCentric.
Both systems support essential booking channels and revenue tools, but SkyTouch’s broader partner network provides slightly more flexibility for complex or multi-channel operations. If integrations are a priority, SkyTouch leads.
Edge: SkyTouch
Misterbooking enjoys a higher overall rating (4.78/5) and a recent review count of 29, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its property segment ratings are particularly strong, with an average of 4.82/5 for bed & breakfast, inns, and resorts.
SkyTouch’s ratings are lower at 3.5/5, with only 119 reviews, many of which mention recurring bugs and limited customization. Hoteliers in small, independent, or boutique properties tend to favor Misterbooking’s user experience, while larger hotels may accept SkyTouch’s limitations.
Edge: Misterbooking
Misterbooking does not publicly disclose pricing details, suggesting a customized quote based on hotel size and needs, often making it more accessible for small and independent properties. SkyTouch charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation costs or tiered prices, targeting multi-property groups with larger budgets.
If budget flexibility and scalability matter, Misterbooking likely offers more adaptable options, especially for smaller hotels. Larger groups with predictable expenses might prefer SkyTouch’s straightforward billing.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs basic reservation management or if your team prefers a simple, minimal setup.
Bullets:
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your property is very small or needs extensive customization, given some limitations in report creation and feature flexibility.
Bullets:
Not ideal if:
Misterbooking excels in providing a feature-rich, highly rated PMS, especially for independent, boutique, and small hotel operators. It offers extensive automation, guest communication tools, and better support, making it a strong choice for budget-conscious hotels that need flexibility.
SkyTouch is better suited for larger hotel groups seeking an easy-to-use, cloud-based system with robust reporting and a broad integration network. Its focus on scalability, especially in North America, makes it ideal for properties with multiple locations.
If your hotel values recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a system that adapts to diverse hotel types, Misterbooking is the superior choice. For larger operations with a focus on growth and integration, SkyTouch remains a compelling option despite some reported bugs and limitations.
In summary, choose Misterbooking if you need customization, guest engagement, and a high-rated support team. Opt for SkyTouch if you prioritize ease of use, detailed reporting, and a large network of integrations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Misterbooking (PMS) 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are finding great value and payback versus anything else out there on the market, and I have seen them all."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应能力和效率一再被强调。无论是通过电话还是其他方式,他们的可用性和快速解决问题的能力对用户来说都是一大优势。
用户看重的是能够根据特定需求定制自己的账户。这种灵活性使 Misterbooking 能够很好地适应各种酒店运营,并提高了用户满意度。
虽然该软件功能强大、效率高,但用户指出其设计和人体工程学方面还有待改进。建议包括让布局更加人性化,以及更新一些过时的页面。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
提到需要更高效、更详细的统计工具或报告。用户认为改进这些功能可以带来更好的运营洞察力和决策能力。
预订引擎存在一些批评,例如照片上传选项不足和限制管理。用户建议在这些方面进行改进,以进一步完善系统。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞 SkyTouch 系统直观、操作简便。许多人强调,得益于界面的简洁性,新员工的培训速度非常快。这一特点使得 SkyTouch 特别适合经常招聘新员工的酒店。
SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未... SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未得到解决。
SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优... SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 SkyTouch 提供了一系列功能,但用户报告称该系统的可定制性有限。具体令人担忧的领域包括无法定制报告、用户界面布局和预订流程以满足独特的酒店需求。
许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表... 许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表示,需要支持团队提供更强大的错误修复和更快的解决方案。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Misterbooking (PMS) 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Misterbooking (PMS) 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SkyTouch Technology 提供 33 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Misterbooking (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Misterbooking (PMS):否。SkyTouch Technology:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MISTER BOOKING 的 HT Score 为 14,SkyTouch Technology 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问