The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 126 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Moder 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
SkyTouch Technology 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 126 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 123 |
在分析了 126 条经验证的评价后,Moder 用户最看重其 ,而 SkyTouch Technology 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 客户支持响应能力, 远程访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持响应能力
▾
|
|
|
+
远程访问
▾
|
|
|
+
胶带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可定制性限制
▾
|
|
|
−
错误和故障
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 41 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 72 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #21 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #23 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #18 47 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #22 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #10 45 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #22 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #7 120 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #60 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #38 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Moder by Moder and SkyTouch Technology hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision should consider which system aligns best with your property size, staff expertise, and integration requirements.
Moder is a relatively new PMS with limited reviews but a high satisfaction rating from its few users, emphasizing ease of use and comprehensive management from a single platform. SkyTouch, with over 119 reviews and a higher recent review count, offers an extensive feature set and proven scalability, but faces some criticism over bugs and customization limits. Are you prioritizing recent validation, or a broad feature suite?
SkyTouch Technology, with its 119 reviews and a recent review count of zero, offers a more tested and feature-rich platform, making it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers. Its 3.5/5 overall rating reflects a large user base’s experience, with most reviews praising its ease of use, support, and extensive integrations.
Moder, with only 3 reviews and a perfect 5/5 rating, signals high satisfaction among a very small user base but lacks the extensive market validation needed to confidently recommend it at scale. Its innovative approach suits niche properties with specific needs but offers less proven scalability.
Is your hotel seeking a tried-and-true platform backed by widespread reviews? Or are you exploring an emerging system with promising features but limited validation?
If your hotel requires a broad set of functionalities with proven reliability, SkyTouch is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—including guest profiles, revenue management, channel management, and integrations—caters well to mid-sized and larger properties, especially those needing detailed reporting and automation.
Conversely, Moder’s unique appeal lies in its ability to serve experience-driven, boutique, or resort hotels looking for an intuitive, all-in-one management hub that simplifies operations without overwhelming staff. Its high ease-of-use rating suggests quicker onboarding and fewer training costs.
Hotels that need a comprehensive, scalable PMS with proven industry integration should lean toward SkyTouch. If your property values simplicity, flexibility, and a modern interface, Moder may fit your needs.
Moder’s user ratings (5/5) indicate an exceptionally intuitive interface, designed with a mobile-first approach that minimizes staff training time. Its onboarding experience is rated highly (5/5), and reviews highlight how quickly staff adapt to its features.
SkyTouch, with a 4.64/5 ease-of-use score, also enjoys positive feedback, especially for its clear, navigable interface and remote accessibility. However, some users report occasional glitches and a learning curve in mastering complex features like group reservations and rate management.
Edge: Moder.
SkyTouch leads with 27 features exclusive to its platform, including guest profiles, online booking engine, revenue management, channel management, automated night audit, and integrated CRS. Its suite supports multi-lingual capabilities, PCI compliance, and extensive reporting options.
Moder, offering a streamlined, all-in-one property management experience, does not list additional features beyond core operational functions, focusing on simplicity and integration. The lack of advanced modules like revenue management or channel management limits its scope for bigger properties.
Edge: SkyTouch Technology.
Both platforms score well on support, with Moder receiving a perfect 5/5 and SkyTouch a strong 4.5/5. Moder’s reviews praise its support team for exceptional ongoing assistance, especially during onboarding, and highlight responsiveness.
SkyTouch’s support is also commended, with many reviewers appreciating their professionalism. However, some older reviews mention delays and unresolved issues, and recent feedback points to frustrations with bugs and support responsiveness during system glitches.
Edge: Moder.
SkyTouch boasts 33 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Chargeback Lost & Found, and GuestCentric, offering broad connectivity with distribution, payment processing, and guest engagement systems.
Moder currently has no verified integrations listed, which could limit scalability and connectivity with other tools. For properties relying heavily on third-party integrations, SkyTouch presents a more flexible platform.
Edge: SkyTouch Technology.
SkyTouch, with a 3.5/5 rating based on 119 reviews, has a more extensive and recent review base, providing a broader perspective. Its user ratings span various hotel segments, with many praising its ease of use and reporting.
Moder’s 5/5 rating from only 3 reviews suggests exceptional satisfaction among a tiny sample but lacks the breadth to be a reliable indicator. Its reviews emphasize user-friendliness and support but are too limited to generalize.
Edge: SkyTouch Technology.
Moder does not publicly disclose pricing, and it appears to operate on a custom quote basis, typical for boutique or enterprise-level PMS providers. This lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison challenging.
SkyTouch charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation fee or trial available. As a more predictable investment, it appeals to properties seeking clear budgeting.
If transparency and predictable costs matter, SkyTouch offers a straightforward pricing model.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, or detailed customization options.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with simple needs, or prefers a system with less complexity and fewer modules.
SkyTouch provides a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with extensive features, integrations, and a proven track record, making it suitable for larger or growing hotels. Its broad partner ecosystem and detailed reporting support high-volume operations and multi-property management.
Moder offers a sleek, easy-to-use platform tailored for experience-driven properties valuing simplicity and speed. It excels in delivering core management functions efficiently but lacks the integrations and advanced modules of SkyTouch.
Choose SkyTouch if your hotel needs broad functionality and proven scalability. Opt for Moder if your focus is on simplicity, fast onboarding, and a modern user experience.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Moder 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 15 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are finding great value and payback versus anything else out there on the market, and I have seen them all."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞 SkyTouch 系统直观、操作简便。许多人强调,得益于界面的简洁性,新员工的培训速度非常快。这一特点使得 SkyTouch 特别适合经常招聘新员工的酒店。
SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未... SkyTouch 的客户支持收到的反馈褒贬不一。许多用户称赞支持团队的专业性和乐于助人。然而,其他人则批评等待时间过长,以及尽管多次报告,但长期存在的问题仍未得到解决。
SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优... SkyTouch 的云端系统因其远程访问功能而广受好评。这使酒店经理能够从任何有互联网接入的地方监控运营、更改价格和查看报告,这对多酒店经理来说是一个显著的优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 SkyTouch 提供了一系列功能,但用户报告称该系统的可定制性有限。具体令人担忧的领域包括无法定制报告、用户界面布局和预订流程以满足独特的酒店需求。
许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表... 许多用户表示,由于反复出现的软件错误和故障,SkyTouch 让他们很失望。这些问题包括间歇性系统崩溃和登录问题,以及磁带图表和内务管理模块等功能故障。用户表示,需要支持团队提供更强大的错误修复和更快的解决方案。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Moder 和 SkyTouch Technology 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Moder 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SkyTouch Technology 提供 33 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Moder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Moder:否。SkyTouch Technology:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Moder 的 HT Score 为 0,SkyTouch Technology 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问