The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 17 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #12 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #11 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 12 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #10 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 36 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #11 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Mozio by Mozio and MyStay by MyStay hinges on what your hotel prioritizes. Mozio specializes in ground transportation, offering an extensive network of transport options—ideal if ancillary revenue from airport transfers is a key focus. Conversely, MyStay functions as an all-in-one guest engagement platform, emphasizing contactless check-in, personalized communications, and upselling. Both aim to boost revenue, but their core functions serve different hotel needs.
Mozio provides an API-driven ground transportation solution, connecting your hotel to a marketplace of transit options. MyStay, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive guest communication and upselling platform with extensive features for personalization and contactless services. Do you need an ancillary revenue boost through ground transfers, or a platform to enhance guest experience and internal upselling?
Mozio targets hotels looking to monetize airport transfers and ground transportation, integrating with OTAs, airlines, and car rental services. Its strength lies in connecting your property to a broad network of transport providers, maximizing ancillary revenue. MyStay addresses hotels seeking to improve guest engagement, streamline check-in/check-out, and increase revenue through personalized upselling and targeted marketing.
The more recent and numerous reviews favor MyStay, with 41 reviews and a 4.82/5 rating, compared to Mozio’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings. If your hotel’s goal is to enhance guest communication and increase in-house revenue, MyStay emerges as the stronger choice. Are you more focused on ground transportation revenue or on elevating the overall guest experience?
If your hotel needs to modernize guest communication, automate upselling, and offer contactless check-in/out, go with MyStay. It’s especially suitable for boutique, city center, or resort hotels aiming to enhance guest satisfaction and maximize revenue from ancillary services. If your hotel’s main goal is to offer seamless airport transfer booking or ground transport options, Mozio is the better fit, especially if you're looking to tap into ancillary revenue streams with a broad network of transport providers.
Given MyStay’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive feature set, it is clearly the more proven solution for guest engagement. If you seek a platform that integrates well with PMS, offers targeted marketing, and has a strong hotel segment focus, MyStay is your choice. For ground transfer sales, Mozio’s specialized platform remains relevant, but data shows less recent adoption.
MyStay scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, with positive comments about its simple interface and smooth integration with PMS. Many users highlight its quick onboarding and straightforward management of automated guest messaging, QR codes, and contactless check-in/out. Mozio, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its usability harder to assess, but as a specialized platform, it may require more technical setup.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay boasts nine exclusive features, including guest segmentation, multi-channel messaging, offer templates, A/B testing, digital acceptance, and payment capture. Mozio offers no unique features beyond its ground transportation API. If your hotel values advanced upselling, personalized marketing, and contactless guest services, MyStay’s feature set exceeds Mozio’s.
With 9 features in total, MyStay clearly outperforms Mozio’s zero, making it the more versatile and comprehensive platform for guest engagement. Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support and onboarding ratings are both 4.85/5, with reviews describing their support as "great cooperation" and "support and their new ideas." Reviewers appreciate the proactive assistance and ongoing development. Mozio has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its customer support reputation unverified. Given the importance of reliable onboarding and ongoing support, MyStay’s higher ratings are decisive.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including PMS providers like Priority Software, Kwentra, and others, making it highly adaptable. Mozio has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity options. If seamless integration with your existing systems is critical, MyStay’s extensive partner network offers a clear advantage.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay has accumulated 41 reviews, primarily from European and North American hotels, with an average rating of 4.82/5. Its reviews focus on ease of use, support, and revenue growth through upselling. Mozio has no recent review data or ratings, indicating less recent adoption or feedback. The current data favors MyStay as the better-rated platform, especially for hotels prioritizing guest experience.
Edge: MyStay.
Mozio’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may operate on custom or enterprise quotes. MyStay charges a $400 monthly fee, with no mention of setup or variable costs, making its pricing transparent and predictable. For hotels seeking clarity on investment, MyStay’s straightforward pricing is advantageous.
Mozio specializes in ground transportation, making it ideal if airport transfers are a significant revenue source for your hotel. Its marketplace approach allows you to offer diverse transport options, but it lacks recent reviews and verified integrations, which limits confidence.
MyStay provides a comprehensive platform for guest communication, upselling, and contactless check-in/out, backed by strong recent reviews, high user ratings, and extensive integrations. Its advanced features support revenue growth, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction at scale.
If your hotel’s focus is on elevating the guest experience while increasing ancillary revenue, MyStay clearly outperforms Mozio. However, if ground transfer revenue is your top priority, Mozio remains a specialized solution worth considering—though its recent adoption appears limited.
Final Recommendation: For most hotels seeking to boost overall guest engagement and revenue, MyStay is the superior choice. Its proven track record, high ratings, and feature richness make it a safer investment. Mozio may serve niche needs related to ground transportation but lacks the recent validation and broader capabilities that modern hoteliers require.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自... 有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自定义和更多文本编辑选项。
用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时... 用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时满足客人需求并提高整体满意度。
MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能... MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能在疫情期间因其非接触式功能而特别受重视。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可... MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可用性和便利性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mozio 和 MyStay 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mozio 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mozio:否。MyStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mozio 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问