The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
my-bookings 表现出色 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 370 |
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,my-bookings 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| my-bookings |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing between my-bookings and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. my-bookings is a lesser-known platform with limited reviews and features, while Stayntouch boasts over 300 reviews, a high rating, and a robust feature set. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s growth plans and guest experience goals?
my-bookings presents itself as an accessible, all-in-one property management system with reservation and invoicing tools that simplify daily tasks. However, it lacks extensive third-party integrations, detailed reporting, and a broad market presence. Conversely, Stayntouch offers a cloud-based platform with a proven track record in multi-property management, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, supported by 188 verified integrations and a high overall rating.
The core difference is that my-bookings appears to be a basic, self-contained solution, while Stayntouch is a scalable, feature-rich platform designed for diverse hotel types and larger operations. With more recent reviews and a higher user rating, Stayntouch demonstrates stronger market confidence. Are you prioritizing a straightforward system or a comprehensive, adaptable PMS?
If your hotel needs a scalable PMS with extensive features, third-party integrations, and a focus on guest experience, go with Stayntouch. Its suite includes revenue management, online check-in, housekeeping modules, and a mobile app — all supported by a high level of user satisfaction.
On the other hand, if your property is small, with minimal operational complexity, and you prefer a simple reservation platform without the need for advanced features, my-bookings might suffice. But remember, it has no reviews, no features, and no market presence, making it a less viable choice for hotels seeking growth or sophistication.
Stayntouch consistently receives high marks for ease of use, with a 4.7/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, rapid onboarding, and mobile support. Users mention that staff can learn the system quickly, and the platform’s design supports efficient daily operations.
my-bookings, with a 0/5 rating and no reviews, offers no data to evaluate usability. Given the absence of user feedback, it’s impossible to judge its interface or onboarding experience.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s 49 features include revenue management, online check-in, group handling, guest profiles, integrated payments, and mobile apps—none of which my-bookings offers. Its advanced modules support modern hotel needs, such as digital registration, automated night audits, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for complex operations.
my-bookings provides reservation management and invoicing features but lacks the extensive capabilities, integrations, or automation present in Stayntouch. The feature gap is substantial, with Stayntouch clearly leading in scope.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support system is highly rated at 4.68/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, effective assistance and thorough onboarding. Users report that support staff are friendly, accessible, and committed to resolving issues quickly, contributing to high customer satisfaction.
my-bookings has no reviews or support ratings to compare. Its lack of presence in the market and absence of feedback suggest it cannot match the proven support quality of Stayntouch.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including major systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and others, providing seamless connections across revenue management, channels, and contactless check-in. This extensive ecosystem allows your hotel to tailor its tech stack to specific operational needs.
my-bookings offers no verified integrations, limiting its flexibility and potential for growth. For hotels relying on third-party systems, Stayntouch’s extensive integration network is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating from 317 reviews reflects broad, recent positive feedback across hotel segments, especially boutique and independent properties. Hotels like the TWA Hotel and Catbird Hotel praise its ease of use, automation, and guest satisfaction improvements.
my-bookings has no reviews, so it cannot be rated or trusted based on user feedback. Its lack of market presence makes it unlikely to meet the expectations of modern hoteliers.
Edge: Stayntouch.
my-bookings does not publicly disclose pricing details, suggesting it might be customized or less transparent. In contrast, Stayntouch charges $800 monthly, with no setup fees or hidden costs, offering a clear pricing structure for hotel operators.
Considering value, Stayntouch’s pricing aligns with its feature set and support, making it easier to evaluate ROI.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Stayntouch offers a full-featured, scalable platform supported by extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and widespread integration options. Its user interface and support services are highly rated, making it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels, chains, and properties seeking modern, guest-centric solutions.
my-bookings remains a less proven option, with no reviews, features, or market presence to support its suitability. It’s likely only appropriate for very small properties with basic needs and no growth plans.
If your hotel requires a reliable, feature-rich property management system with proven support, choose Stayntouch. It will enable operational efficiency, better guest experiences, and future scalability.
If your property is small, with minimal operational complexity, and you’re comfortable with a minimal system, my-bookings might be enough — but beware of its limited market validation.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to grow and meet guest expectations, Stayntouch is the clear choice based on available data and recent reviews.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| my-bookings |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,my-bookings 和 Stayntouch 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。my-bookings 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。my-bookings 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
my-bookings:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。my-bookings 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问