项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 1,440 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 易用性和入门, 日历和可视化预订管理, 报告与分析,而 Octorate 用户则强调 入职和实施支持, 产品的易用性和学习曲线, 日常运营和客人工作流程的自动化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和入门
▾
|
+
入职和实施支持
▾
|
|
+
日历和可视化预订管理
▾
|
+
产品的易用性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
日常运营和客人工作流程的自动化
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理与OTA同步
▾
|
+
酒店管理集中化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和人工服务
▾
|
−
移动应用和界面优化
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
|
|
−
账单、账务和发票工作流程
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 694 条评价 | #49 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 222 条评价 | #75 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 48 条评价 | #55 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #15 3 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 562 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 242 条评价 | #57 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 126 条评价 | #71 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 100 条评价 | #41 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 468 条评价 | #45 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 175 条评价 | #23 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 340 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | — |
Both Cloudbeds PMS and Octorate aim to simplify hotel management by consolidating operations into a single platform. Cloudbeds, with its extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, clearly demonstrates its broad adoption and trust among hoteliers. Octorate, while feature-rich and well-respected in certain segments, lacks recent reviews and a larger user base. Do you prioritize proven success and extensive support, or are you seeking a customizable, multi-channel solution with a more specialized focus?
Cloudbeds and Octorate both serve as central hubs for hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in their market presence and feature sets. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools, with over 1,071 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating. Octorate, on the other hand, primarily emphasizes reservations, housekeeping, and guest communication, with no recent reviews available and a smaller footprint.
Cloudbeds benefits from a comprehensive ecosystem that supports a wide range of hotel types, especially those seeking an integrated growth engine. Octorate excels in automation and multi-channel management, especially for properties that require detailed rate and distribution control. Are you looking for a proven, all-in-one platform or a flexible, specialized solution for multi-channel operations?
If your hotel needs a trusted, scalable platform with a proven track record, go with Cloudbeds. Its large review volume, recent high ratings, and extensive feature set make it ideal for properties of all sizes aiming to streamline operations, increase direct bookings, and access a global support network.
If your hotel prioritizes advanced distribution controls, dynamic pricing, and automation tools tailored for diverse property types, Octorate may be suitable. However, note that Octorate lacks recent reviews and a broad third-party ecosystem, so its suitability depends heavily on your specific operational needs and regional requirements.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS with recent validation, Cloudbeds is the clearer choice.
Cloudbeds boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.61/5, backed by over 1,000 reviews and recent positive feedback praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Its onboarding process is rated 4.45/5, and users highlight quick setup and straightforward daily operations, including reservations and housekeeping.
Octorate’s usability is less documented publicly, and without recent reviews, it's difficult to assess its user experience. Its dashboard seems designed for tech-savvy users familiar with automation and multi-channel management, but the lack of recent feedback limits confidence.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 51 shared features plus 13 exclusive ones, including unlimited channels at no extra cost, integrated payment terminals, mobile housekeeping apps, rules-based room assignments, and GDPR compliance. Its features support both operational efficiency and guest engagement at a broad scale.
Octorate provides 51 shared features but emphasizes advanced automation, in-app support, multi-property management, rate intelligence, and multi-currency support. It integrates with dynamic pricing tools like PriceLabs and Beyond, offering in-depth revenue strategies.
While Cloudbeds's extensive feature set is rooted in broad hotel management needs, Octorate excels in automation and distribution controls. For comprehensive, all-in-one management, Cloudbeds holds an edge.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support rating of 4.41/5 reflects its reputation for quick, helpful responses, with reviews praising its attentive support team that guides users through setup and troubleshooting. Its onboarding process is similarly rated, contributing to smoother adoption.
Octorate, lacking recent reviews, offers in-app support and automated guest communication but provides no publicly available recent support ratings. Its smaller team size might suggest more personalized but less proven support at scale.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and third-party tools, with 16 shared integrations. Its marketplace includes partners like Expedia, Booking.com, PayPal, and more, facilitating broad connectivity.
Octorate features 28 verified partners, with strong integrations to OTAs like Booking.com, Airbnb, and Expedia, plus connections to dynamic pricing and automation tools like PriceLabs. Its native integrations support seamless multi-channel management.
Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network and verified integrations give it a distinct advantage for properties needing broad, reliable connectivity.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a higher overall rating of 4.63/5, with 81 recent reviews in the last 6 months and a likelihood to recommend of 91%. Its users span boutique hotels, hostels, and other independent properties, often mentioning ease of use, support, and revenue growth.
Octorate has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction currently. Its niche appeal might be higher for specific property types, but without recent feedback, Cloudbeds’s reputation is more trustworthy.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or trial, providing a straightforward subscription model suited for hotels ready to invest in an all-in-one platform.
Octorate’s base price is $1,100/month and offers a 30-day trial. Its higher price point reflects its advanced automation and multi-channel management features but may be less accessible for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
For value and proven results, Cloudbeds offers a more transparent and cost-effective solution.
Not ideal if you need offline operations or have very specific, niche automation needs.
Not ideal if you require a large, well-supported platform with a proven market track record or prefer extensive third-party integrations outside Octorate’s ecosystem.
Cloudbeds leads as the most reviewed, trusted, and feature-rich PMS, with recent high ratings, extensive integrations, and a robust support network. Its all-in-one approach benefits hotels looking for scalable, reliable, and easy-to-use management software.
Octorate offers strong automation and multi-channel management capabilities, especially suited for properties that prioritize distribution control, dynamic pricing, and guest communication. However, its lack of recent reviews and smaller ecosystem make it a less proven choice for most hotels today.
If you want a proven, comprehensive system that supports growth and simplifies operations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Opt for Octorate if your focus is on automation, distribution, and detailed rate management, and your team is comfortable with a less-tested platform.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或... 一个普遍的观点是,Cloudbeds 相对容易学习,界面清晰,适合技术能力有限的小型酒店或团队。一些评价者称赞其入门和培训资料,而另一些则表示设置过程可能较慢或不完整,尤其是在初始实施阶段。
用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度... 用户最常赞扬Cloudbeds的清晰日历视图,它使查看房态、移动预订、拆分住宿以及直观处理入住和变更变得简单。评论者表示,这减少了点击次数,加快了前台工作速度,并帮助员工一目了然地了解酒店情况。
用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现... 用户经常提到Cloudbeds的报告功能对于集中查看绩效、入住率、收入和运营趋势非常有用。与此同时,许多用户希望获得更多的自定义选项、更快的下载速度,以及更现代的仪表盘式可视化,而不是类似Excel的导出格式。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望... 支持是评价中的一个重要区分点,但许多用户希望能更快地联系到人工,减少聊天机器人带来的阻碍。有些用户赞扬快速且有帮助的聊天或实施支持,而另一些用户则希望针对紧急的前台问题能提供电话、视频或直接代理支持。
一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知... 一个反复出现的主要问题是,移动应用常被视为只读或功能过于有限,无法进行实际操作。评论者多次希望能够直接在应用中创建和编辑预订、管理房间,并接收实时通知,而无需切换回网页浏览器或电子邮件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户经常强调Octorate的入职和实施帮助是其主要价值驱动因素。支持团队多次被赞扬为能够清楚地解释平台、正确配置系统,并帮助酒店充分发挥软件的功能。
一些用户表示,Octorate 一旦掌握后非常直观,但功能的丰富性一开始可能会觉得复杂。评论显示系统功能强大且完整,但部分用户希望外联网界面简化或更易于导航。
一个主要主题是自动化重复的酒店任务,特别是与客人沟通和运营跟进相关的工作。用户重视自动化的电子邮件、模板、自助入住表单、文件请求和提醒,这些都能减少手... 一个主要主题是自动化重复的酒店任务,特别是与客人沟通和运营跟进相关的工作。用户重视自动化的电子邮件、模板、自助入住表单、文件请求和提醒,这些都能减少手动工作并提升响应速度。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一组较小但重要的反馈指出了移动端和界面方面的改进。用户提到苹果应用可以更简洁,移动补充信息的视图需要更少滚动,甚至聊天机器人的位置也可以优化以便操作更... 一组较小但重要的反馈指出了移动端和界面方面的改进。用户提到苹果应用可以更简洁,移动补充信息的视图需要更少滚动,甚至聊天机器人的位置也可以优化以便操作更便捷。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Octorate (Property Management System) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 206 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Octorate (Property Management System) 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Octorate (Property Management System):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Octorate 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐