The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 29 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Lobby Kiosk.
OKKAMI INC 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Automatic Translations and PCI Compliant.
基于 HTR 上 29 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 29 | 0 |
在分析了 29 条经验证的评价后,LIKE MAGIC 用户最看重其 宾客旅程应用程序, 自动化与集成, 非接触式办理登机手续,而 OKKAMI INC 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客旅程应用程序
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与集成
▾
|
|
|
+
非接触式办理登机手续
▾
|
|
|
+
设计灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收入机会
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知延迟
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 10 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #15 2 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #17 1 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | — | #9 0 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating contactless check-in platforms—LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) by LIKE MAGIC and OKKAMI Contactless Check-In by OKKAMI INC. Both aim to streamline guest arrivals, reduce front desk congestion, and enhance guest experiences. While they share the core goal, their features, support, and market presence differ substantially, impacting which is best suited for your property’s needs.
LIKE MAGIC dominates in review volume and recent feedback, indicating a more mature product with proven results. Meanwhile, OKKAMI, although less reviewed, offers certain unique features like automatic translations and PCI compliance. The key question: which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational scale and guest expectations?
LIKE MAGIC’s platform is built around a comprehensive guest journey, combining contactless check-in, digital keys, and automation, supported by 29 reviews with 2 recent ones. It scores a high 74.02 on the HT Score and boasts a 99% likelihood of recommendation, reflecting strong user confidence. In contrast, OKKAMI INC has no reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess real-world performance.
The core difference lies in maturity: LIKE MAGIC’s platform has been tested and refined, while OKKAMI’s offering appears more nascent, with no publicly available user feedback. LIKE MAGIC’s emphasis on guest self-service and automation contrasts with OKKAMI’s focus on pre-arrival document uploads and express check-out. Which features are more aligned with your hotel’s current and future needs?
If your hotel prioritizes a well-established platform with proven efficacy and a high user satisfaction rate, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its suite of features, including contactless check-in, digital keys, and a guest journey app, is backed by nearly 30 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and operational efficiency. It’s especially suited for hotels aiming to reduce staffing while improving guest experience.
If your hotel needs specific functionalities like automatic translations, PCI compliance, or easy room selection, and you’re comfortable exploring a less proven solution, OKKAMI INC might be worth considering. However, without review data, there’s greater risk in terms of reliability and user satisfaction. For most hoteliers seeking a verified, robust solution, LIKE MAGIC offers the more dependable choice.
LIKE MAGIC’s UI receives a 4.9/5 rating, reflecting a highly intuitive interface favored by users. Its onboarding process is rated 4.78/5, and support reviews highlight a support team rated 4.83/5, indicating strong customer service. Reviewers praise its simplicity, highlighting that guests can check in without downloading apps—just clicking a link.
OKKAMI has yet to provide user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge ease of use. Its features, such as document uploads and mobile check-out, seem straightforward but lack the social proof that reassures new users. Based on current data, edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC offers 16 shared features along with one unique feature: Lobby Kiosk, supporting in-person self-service check-in. Its additional features include full guest journey management, automated task handling, and integrations with various PMS and key systems.
OKKAMI provides three exclusive features: automatic translations, PCI compliance, and easy room selection, which are not available in LIKE MAGIC. While these are valuable for certain markets, the overall feature set of LIKE MAGIC is broader and more tested, providing a more complete contactless solution.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC’s customer support is rated 4.83/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers note that support helps streamline staff training and quickly resolves issues, making implementation smoother and less disruptive.
OKKAMI has no review data to evaluate support quality. As a relatively newer and less reviewed platform, support reliability remains unverified. For stability and confidence in ongoing assistance, edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SALTO Systems. It supports a variety of integrations—covering property management, access control, and online booking channels.
OKKAMI connects with 12 verified partners, including Infor, Amadeus, and HotelKey. While it offers a slightly broader selection, the real-world integration performance isn’t yet proven through reviews.
Given LIKE MAGIC’s established reputation and proven integration success, edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC’s review score of 74.02 and 29 reviews—two of which are recent—show strong user satisfaction, especially in Europe and Asia Pacific. Its users consistently praise its ease of use, support, and the efficiency it brings.
OKKAMI, lacking any reviews or ratings, cannot be rated by hoteliers. This absence makes it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific performance.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat base price of $700, with no mention of implementation fees or ongoing costs. It does not offer a freemium model or per-room charges, simplifying budgeting.
Pricing data for OKKAMI INC isn’t publicly available, with no mention of fees, subscriptions, or trial options. Without transparent pricing, assessing value becomes conjectural.
Based on available data, edge: LIKE MAGIC for clear, predictable pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
LIKE MAGIC stands out as a mature, feature-rich contactless check-in platform with clear advantages in support, ease of use, and proven integrations. Its extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it a reliable choice for hotels prioritizing guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Choose LIKE MAGIC if you want a tested platform with high user approval, transparent pricing, and proven results across multiple markets. Its automation and guest journey features directly support staff reduction and revenue growth.
OKKAMI might appeal to properties with specific pre-arrival or compliance needs, especially in multilingual or international markets. However, without review data, its reliability and user satisfaction remain unverified, making it a riskier investment for most hotels.
For most hoteliers seeking a dependable, well-supported contactless check-in solution, LIKE MAGIC is the recommended choice.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 自动翻译 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了... 宾客旅程应用程序 (Guest Journey App) 作为一个集中式枢纽,整合多种沟通渠道,让宾客能够以数字化方式管理服务。其直观的设计显著减少了人员需求,同时提升了宾客体验。
用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验... 用户看重 LikeMagic,因为它能够与 PMS 和数字钥匙系统等现有系统无缝集成。客房服务和付款处理等重复性任务的自动化,让酒店员工能够专注于打造卓越的宾客体验。
LikeMagic 的非接触式入住服务备受赞誉,提升了宾客的便利性,并减少了前台的拥挤。宾客可以通过手机办理入住,流程快捷卫生,尤其受到国际旅客的青睐。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
LikeMagic 以通过客房升级和套餐附加服务等功能提升增值收入而闻名。该平台整合了延迟退房或客房送餐等附加服务,为提升收入提供了宝贵的机会。
人们经常提到需要更全面的分析和报告功能。用户表示希望拥有能够追踪宾客参与度并提供关键绩效指标的高级模块,从而更好地做出决策并改进服务。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 和 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC (Check-in) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LIKE MAGIC (Check-in):否。OKKAMI Contactless Check-In:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LIKE MAGIC 的 HT Score 为 74,OKKAMI INC 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问