The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Opayo |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Opayo |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Opayo |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Opayo by Opayo and Zil Money hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. While Opayo offers a basic, no-frills payment solution with no reviews or features listed, Zil Money stands out with a comprehensive suite of financial tools, numerous recent reviews, and a high user rating. Your decision should consider the scale of your operations, integration needs, and the importance of customer support.
Opayo appears limited in features and market presence, whereas Zil Money boasts a broad feature set, active user community, and recent positive feedback. Are you seeking a more established, feature-rich platform? Or is a straightforward, secure payment gateway sufficient for your hotel?
Opayo’s primary role is to facilitate basic payment transactions, offering minimal features and no recent reviews. Zil Money, in contrast, provides an extensive array of payment options, including PayPal, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and multi-currency settlements, supported by 54 reviews in the last six months and a high 87% likelihood of recommendation.
While Opayo’s lack of recent reviews and features suggests limited ongoing development or user engagement, Zil Money’s active review activity and 4.5/5 ease of use rating indicate current relevance and user satisfaction. Do you need a simple payment processor or a full-featured financial management platform?
If your hotel requires a broad set of payment options, multi-currency support, and automation features like recurring payments and contactless transactions, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its user-friendly platform, recent reviews, and high support ratings make it suitable for hotels seeking operational efficiency.
Conversely, if your hotel only needs a straightforward payment gateway without advanced features or global payment options, Opayo's minimal offering might suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and features make it less advisable. For hotels prioritizing feature richness and ongoing support, Zil Money remains the stronger contender.
Opayo’s interface and onboarding process are undocumented and unreviewed, suggesting a lack of recent user feedback or engagement. Zil Money receives a notable 4.5/5 rating for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive design, quick setup, and straightforward payment management.
Recent reviews indicate hotel staff find Zil Money easy to adopt, thanks to its simple navigation and clear processes. In contrast, Opayo’s usability remains unverified, placing it at a disadvantage. Edge: Zil Money.
Opayo offers no listed features, with only a basic payment processing function implied. Zil Money provides 15 unique features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and Pre-Authorizations.
The detailed feature set in Zil Money caters to diverse hotel operations, supporting online payments and flexible financial management. Opayo’s lack of features and activity suggests it may be a bare-bones solution. Edge: Zil Money.
Opayo’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, providing no insight into user experiences. Zil Money’s recent reviews highlight a support team rated 4.5/5, with users describing it as responsive and helpful.
While some users mention the potential for faster responses, overall, Zil Money’s support reputation appears strong. If reliable customer assistance is vital, Zil Money holds a clear advantage. Edge: Zil Money.
Opayo shows zero verified integration partners, indicating limited or no official third-party integrations. Zil Money, also with no verified partners, nonetheless offers an open API, allowing custom integrations.
Given the absence of a verified partner ecosystem, Zil Money’s API flexibility provides more adaptability than Opayo’s limited connectivity. Edge: Zil Money.
Opayo’s review count is zero, with no recent ratings or feedback to gauge hotel sentiment. Zil Money, with 54 reviews and an 8.57/5 NPS score, benefits from recent, positive feedback, especially from hotels in North America, Europe, and beyond.
Hotels across multiple segments, including luxury and budget hotels, rate Zil Money highly, praising its ease of use and comprehensive features. The lack of reviews for Opayo makes it impossible to compare; thus, Zil Money is the clear leader here.
Opayo’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may operate on a custom quote or be a less transparent offering. Zil Money charges $400 upfront, with no ongoing monthly or per-room fees, and offers a 15-day free trial.
Given the transparent, straightforward pricing structure of Zil Money, it presents clear value compared to the mystery surrounding Opayo’s costs.
The core difference is that Zil Money offers a comprehensive, actively supported platform with multiple features, recent reviews, and high hotel ratings. Opayo remains a minimal, unreviewed payment gateway with no listed features, making it less suitable for modern hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich payment platform with ongoing support, Zil Money is the better fit. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores confirm its relevance and reliability today.
However, if simplicity and minimal costs are your primary concerns, and your hotel’s payment needs are limited, Opayo could suffice—though its lack of recent activity and features make it a less compelling choice overall.
This comparison underscores that Zil Money’s active user base, feature set, and recent positive feedback make it the recommended solution for most hotels today. Opayo’s limited offering and lack of recent reviews diminish its appeal in a competitive landscape.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Opayo 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Opayo 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Opayo:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Opayo 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问