The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel is essential for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experience, and increasing revenue. Opera by Opera and Preno by Preno are two prominent options, but they serve different needs and hotel segments. Opera, with zero recent reviews and a rating of 0/5, is a legacy system with limited recent user feedback, while Preno boasts a 4.73/5 rating from over 144 recent reviews, making it the clearer choice based on current hotelier experiences.
Both platforms aim to simplify hotel management, but their approaches and target markets differ significantly. Opera is traditionally used by large, complex hotel groups, whereas Preno caters primarily to small to midsize hotels, boutique properties, and independent operators. Do these differences influence your decision?
Opera by Opera has a long history as a comprehensive, enterprise-level PMS designed for large hotel chains and properties with complex needs. Its core strengths lie in managing reservations, front desk tasks, and housekeeping, but it lacks recent updates or user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current usability or support quality.
Preno, in contrast, is a cloud-based system built specifically for hoteliers seeking simplicity and ease of use. With over 144 reviews in the last six months, Preno's user feedback is current and positive, emphasizing its intuitive interface, reliable support, and valuable features. Does your hotel need a solution that adapts quickly to modern demands?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, user-friendly PMS that integrates well with other tools and provides ongoing support, Preno is the better fit. Its robust review count and recent user satisfaction ratings indicate it is actively meeting hotelier needs for efficiency and ease of operation.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, large-scale system with extensive integration options, Opera might be suitable—though its outdated reviews suggest your team should carefully evaluate whether it still meets modern standards. For most small to midsize hotels, Preno's current feature set and support offerings outweigh Opera’s legacy presence.
Preno earns a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive, web-based interface, and straightforward onboarding. Support staff are praised for their responsiveness, often assisting with onboarding and troubleshooting.
Opera, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, provides no recent data on usability or support, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain. Given Preno’s recent user feedback and high satisfaction scores, it clearly offers a superior user experience. Edge: Preno.
Preno outshines Opera significantly, offering 30 unique features including integrated channel management, real-time reporting, automated night audits, guest CRM, and a native booking engine. Its mobile app and ancillary revenue tracking are additional advantages.
Opera appears to have no listed features or recent updates, which raises concerns about its current capabilities. Given Preno’s extensive feature set and ongoing upgrades, it is the clear choice for hoteliers seeking a modern, feature-rich management system. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support receives high praise, with a 4.8/5 rating and positive quotes emphasizing quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance during onboarding. Its 144 recent reviews attest to consistent support quality.
Opera offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its current support quality. For hotel teams that prioritize reliable, prompt assistance, Preno’s support is a decisive advantage. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners including Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, providing extensive options for accounting, channel management, and guest feedback. Opera’s lack of verified integrations or recent updates suggests minimal or outdated connectivity.
Preno’s active integrations facilitate seamless workflow automation, reducing manual effort and errors—a critical advantage for small to midsize hotels. Edge: Preno.
Preno is rated 4.73/5 by over 144 hotel reviews, with high marks from boutique hotels, motels, and resorts, especially in recent feedback. Its 9.53/5 NPS score indicates strong loyalty and satisfaction.
Opera’s review score remains at 0/5 with no recent feedback, reflecting little current customer satisfaction or engagement. Based on recent, verified hotel reviews, Preno is far better rated. Edge: Preno.
Opera’s pricing details are unavailable, and it likely involves custom enterprise contracts, typical for legacy systems. Preno charges a straightforward $800 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs.
For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking transparent pricing, Preno’s flat-rate model offers clarity and predictability. Opera’s unclear pricing makes Preno the more accessible option. Edge: Preno.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or values quick deployment and simple workflows. Opera’s lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be the best choice for modern, agile properties.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or operates in a highly complex, enterprise environment. Larger hotel groups may find Preno’s feature set limiting.
Opera by Opera offers a broad, enterprise-level PMS designed for large hotel groups, but its lack of recent reviews and updates makes it less reliable today. Preno, with over 144 recent reviews, a 4.73/5 rating, and a comprehensive feature set, clearly appeals to small and midsize hotels looking for a modern, supported management platform.
If your hotel values simplicity, support, and integrated features, Preno is the safer, more proven choice. For large, complex operations requiring extensive customization, Opera could still be considered, but proceed cautiously given its outdated review status. Overall, Preno’s current market presence and positive feedback make it the better option for most hoteliers today.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Opera 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Opera 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Opera:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Opera 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问