The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 181 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Paraty Tech 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting.
ROIBACK 表现出色 在 支持和客户服务 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 181 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,300/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 136 | 45 |
在分析了 181 条经验证的评价后,Paraty Tech 用户最看重其 customer support, technical adaptability and constant improvements, ease of use and integration,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
+
Technical adaptability and constant improvements
▾
|
+
直接预订优化
▾
|
|
+
Ease of use and integration
▾
|
+
技术改进
▾
|
|
+
Direct sales increase
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Extranet and back-office functionality
▾
|
−
多语言和用户友好界面
▾
|
|
−
Project delays and coordination
▾
|
−
支付网关
▾
|
|
−
Mobile interface improvements
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #20 17 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 69 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 26 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 50 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #17 20 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #11 33 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 15 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 7 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Paraty Tech and Roiback for your hotel’s booking engine hinges on your specific operational needs and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings and streamline guest management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. Paraty Tech is celebrated for its in-house technology, extensive customization, and robust support, while Roiback offers a slightly more affordable entry point with strong analytics and partner integrations. Which solution aligns best with your goals?
Both Paraty Tech and Roiback serve the core purpose of increasing direct bookings, but their approaches diverge. Paraty Tech emphasizes a highly customizable, revenue management-oriented platform known for its adaptability and in-house developed tools. Roiback, meanwhile, focuses on a comprehensive set of features combined with detailed analytics and an emphasis on simplicity and scalability.
Paraty Tech boasts a higher overall rating (88.86 vs 72.07) and significantly more recent reviews (59 in the last 6 months versus 5 for Roiback). Its reviews frequently mention increased revenues, fast support, and ease of integration, reflecting a mature platform trusted by hotels seeking control and customization. Roiback’s strength lies in its straightforward usability and solid support, making it appealing for hotels prioritizing simplicity and marketing tools.
Given the differences, your choice should depend on whether you prioritize advanced customization and in-house tech (Paraty Tech) or a more streamlined, analytically driven platform (Roiback). Are you looking for a platform that adapts precisely to your needs, or one that offers quick deployment and analytics to scale your direct sales?
If your hotel needs a flexible, in-house developed booking system with extensive customization, Paraty Tech is the clear choice. Its features include multi-currency, multi-lingual support, A/B testing, special offers, pooled inventory, and gift vouchers—none of which Roiback offers natively. For hotels with complex needs like wedding modules or ADA compliance, Paraty Tech offers 12 features exclusive to its platform.
Conversely, Roiback suits hotels that want a cost-effective, easy-to-implement solution with strong analytics and seamless integrations. With a lower starting price ($500 vs. $1,300), it appeals to properties seeking rapid deployment and reliable support. If your hotel’s focus is on straightforward online sales growth with robust reporting, Roiback’s platform, with 36 shared features, provides a solid foundation.
In summary, choose Paraty Tech if you need in-depth customization and own-developed revenue tools. Opt for Roiback if you want an affordable, scalable platform with excellent analytics and easy integration.
Paraty Tech scores a high 4.61/5 for ease of use, thanks to its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its reviews highlight fast, dedicated account management and support that facilitate staff adoption—key for teams that need minimal disruption during transition. However, some mention the back-office and reporting dashboards could be more visual and user-friendly.
Roiback’s UI is praised for its clarity, earning a 4.49/5 rating, with users finding it easy to navigate and manage. Its onboarding process is smooth but slightly less personalized than Paraty’s, with some reviewers noting a learning curve in customizing advanced features. Overall, both platforms are user-friendly, but Paraty Tech’s in-house support and personalized attention give it a slight edge in ease of use.
Edge: Paraty Tech
Paraty Tech’s platform offers 12 features unique to its system, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, A/B testing, special offers, pooled inventory, automated reporting, gift vouchers, ADA compliance, and wedding modules. These features enable highly tailored marketing, guest experience, and operational strategies.
Roiback provides 36 shared features, with no exclusive features of its own, focusing on core booking engine functionalities and integrations. Its strength lies in smooth connectivity with channel managers and built-in analytics, but it lacks the extensive customization tools Paraty Tech offers.
Overall, Paraty Tech’s additional features make it better suited for hotels that want flexibility and advanced marketing capabilities. Edge: Paraty Tech
Paraty Tech consistently receives higher ratings for customer support (4.83/5 vs 4.72/5). Reviewers praise their fast, personalized service, with many noting their account managers’ quick response times and proactive problem-solving. Several reviews mention that support was available 24/7, providing peace of mind during critical periods.
Roiback also offers strong support, with ratings of 4.72/5, and its team receives praise for responsiveness and expertise. However, reviews indicate that Roiback’s support is slightly less personalized and sometimes slower in addressing complex issues.
In this comparison, Paraty Tech’s dedicated, in-house support team provides a slight advantage for hotels valuing high-touch service. Edge: Paraty Tech
Paraty Tech integrates with 28 verified partners, including Omnibees, Dingus, Stripe, and XLR8, with 16 shared integrations like SiteMinder and RateGain. Its wide range of integrations helps hotels connect with PMS, channel managers, and other tech systems seamlessly.
Roiback supports 27 verified partners, including RoomRaccoon, Triptease, and Oracle Hospitality, with many overlapping integrations. Its native connectivity with leading channel managers and PMS providers ensures smooth operation, though some users report occasional delays.
Given the similar number of integrations, Paraty Tech’s broader exclusive partner list provides slightly more flexibility. Edge: Paraty Tech
Paraty Tech enjoys a higher overall rating (88.86 vs 72.07) and significantly more recent reviews—59 in the past six months versus only 5 for Roiback—indicating more current user satisfaction. Hoteliers frequently praise Paraty Tech for its effectiveness in increasing direct sales, easy integration, and responsive support.
Roiback, despite a strong support reputation, receives fewer recent reviews and a lower HT score, suggesting less momentum and fewer current user endorsements. Larger hotels and chains tend to favor Paraty Tech’s advanced features, but smaller properties appreciate Roiback’s simplicity.
Overall, the higher recent review volume and rating favor Paraty Tech. Edge: Paraty Tech
Paraty Tech’s pricing starts at $1,300 per month, with no freemium or trial options, reflecting its enterprise-grade focus. Roiback offers a lower base price of $500, with no additional charges for implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it more accessible for smaller hotels or those just starting to scale.
While Paraty Tech’s price is higher, it includes more advanced features and dedicated support, justifying the investment for hotels seeking extensive customization. Roiback’s affordability makes it an attractive option for properties prioritizing cost-effectiveness and straightforward implementation.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Paraty Tech offers a more sophisticated, customizable booking engine with a high level of support, making it suitable for hotels with diverse needs and bigger digital ambitions. Its in-house technology and extensive features help drive revenue and operational efficiency, especially for larger or luxury properties.
Roiback provides a strong, more affordable alternative for hotels seeking reliable analytics, seamless integrations, and straightforward management. Its ease of use and support make it a good match for smaller properties or those new to direct booking growth.
For hotels prioritizing advanced features and ongoing innovation, Paraty Tech is the clear winner. If your goal is quick deployment, solid analytics, and cost-efficiency, Roiback is the better choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,300/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Paraty Tech 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享 36 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 自动报告 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We know the potential that our direct channel has. Our expectation and challenge is for it to reach a sales share of 20% of our annual closing. The objective of this evolution, in..."
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While generally supportive and responsive, some reviews express the need for better follow-up and more proactive account management.
Users appreciate the technology's adaptability and Paraty's commitment to continuous improvements and innovations in their booking engine and services... Users appreciate the technology's adaptability and Paraty's commitment to continuous improvements and innovations in their booking engine and services.
The majority of the reviews highlight the ease of use of Paraty's booking engine, noting its user-friendly design and smooth integration with channel... The majority of the reviews highlight the ease of use of Paraty's booking engine, noting its user-friendly design and smooth integration with channel managers and other hotel systems.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Several reviews cite the need for a more intuitive and functional extranet and back-office system to facilitate easy management without needing extens... Several reviews cite the need for a more intuitive and functional extranet and back-office system to facilitate easy management without needing extensive support.
Several reviews mention frustrations with project delays and poor coordination, affecting campaign execution and the timing of updates.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Paraty Tech 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Paraty Tech 提供 28 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Paraty Tech 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Paraty Tech:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Paraty Tech 的 HT Score 为 89,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问