The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 196 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 响应支持团队, 易于使用, 动态定价,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应支持团队
▾
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
直接预订优化
▾
|
|
+
动态定价
▾
|
+
技术改进
▾
|
|
+
与 PMS/CMS/CRM 集成
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎定制
▾
|
−
多语言和用户友好界面
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
支付网关
▾
|
|
−
接口连接问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 25 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 59 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 84 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 64 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 41 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 15 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 108 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 9 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | #19 2 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. Product A, Cendyn Booking Engine, and Product B, Roiback | Booking Engine, both aim to increase direct bookings and streamline operations, but they differ in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, target segments, and specific needs.
Both platforms solve the core problem of converting website visitors into bookings efficiently. However, they diverge in their approach to features and integrations—Cendyn emphasizes merchandising and cross-selling, while Roiback focuses on analytics and customization. Which solution best aligns with your hotel’s growth strategy?
Cendyn Booking Engine is designed for hotels seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a focus on upselling, multi-currency, and multi-lingual capabilities, making it ideal for brands with international or diverse markets. Conversely, Roiback is geared toward hotels that prioritize flexible customization, in-depth reporting, and a strong focus on increasing direct sales through tailored strategies.
If your hotel operates in multiple regions with complex pricing strategies, Cendyn’s 9 exclusive features—like special offers, pooled inventory, and ADA compliance—offer a broader set of merchandising tools. Roiback’s strength lies in its flexible interface, detailed analytics, and continuous feature updates, making it suitable for hotels aiming for data-driven growth.
Given Cendyn’s higher overall rating (4.38/5 vs. Roiback’s 0/5), and more recent reviews, it’s clear that Cendyn’s user base and market presence currently offer a more reliable choice. Are you looking for a more established platform with a broader feature set and recent reviews?
If your hotel prioritizes a robust, multi-lingual, and multi-currency platform with extensive merchandising options, Cendyn is the better choice. Its larger review base (124 reviews) and higher overall rating reflect more recent positive feedback, especially from independent and boutique hotels, which rate it at 4.72/5.
If your hotel values detailed analytics, flexible rate management, and personalized consulting, Roiback’s strengths shine through. Its focus on direct sales growth and continuous feature expansion makes it appealing for hotels aiming for a tailored, data-driven approach. Given the recent reviews and higher customer support ratings (4.72/5 vs. 4.56/5), Cendyn currently holds the edge.
Cendyn scores slightly lower (4.36/5) for ease of use compared to Roiback (4.49/5), reflecting its more extensive feature set and complex customization options. Users praise Roiback’s intuitive interface, which simplifies the booking process and onboarding, especially for international guests with its multi-language support.
Cendyn’s onboarding score (4.23/5) indicates a user-friendly experience but suggests a slight learning curve due to its broader capabilities. Support teams on both platforms are rated highly, with Roiback’s support (4.72/5) being slightly more responsive and personalized.
Edge: Roiback.
Cendyn offers 9 features exclusive to its platform, such as special offers & discounts, multi-currency support, and ADA compliance, providing extensive merchandising tools. Roiback’s unique features include room substitutions, rate plan comparisons, and gift vouchers, totaling 6 exclusive features.
Both share 30 features, but Cendyn’s broader suite is advantageous for hotels needing advanced merchandising, multi-lingual support, and corporate modules. Roiback excels in customization and promotional tools, making it ideal for hotels with complex rate strategies.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s customer support scores 4.56/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and troubleshooting assistance. Users mention that support is effective but note occasional issues with system downtime and connectivity, which can affect operations.
Roiback’s support scores higher at 4.72/5, with clients highlighting personalized consulting and quick response times. Reviews emphasize the proactive guidance and ongoing improvements driven by Roiback’s dedicated team.
Edge: Roiback.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified partners, including major channel managers and PMS systems like Siteminder and Preno, facilitating extensive connectivity. Roiback has 27 verified partners, with strong integrations with leading channel managers and PMS systems such as SiteMinder and D-Edge.
Shared integrations include Cendyn, GuestCentric, and RateGain, but Cendyn’s broader partner network offers more flexibility for diverse tech stacks. If your hotel relies on multiple integrations, Cendyn provides a more extensive ecosystem.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s reviews are more recent, with a total of 124 reviews and an overall rating of 4.38/5, primarily from independent and boutique hotels. Hotels in these segments rate it at 4.72/5, praising ease of use, revenue tools, and support.
Roiback has fewer reviews (43) and a lower overall rating, but recent feedback highlights its user-friendly interface and dedicated support. Larger hotel chains or properties seeking a proven, highly-rated platform will favor Cendyn.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn is priced at $400 per month with no additional implementation or trial fees, offering a transparent, flat-rate model. Roiback charges $500 per month, also without implementation fees, positioning itself slightly higher but comparable in value.
Pricing may vary based on features and property size, but both platforms avoid hidden charges, making them accessible options for most hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simpler, less feature-heavy solution or operates with minimal tech infrastructure.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive merchandising features or has a large, complex distribution setup.
Cendyn stands out as the more established, feature-rich platform with a larger user base, recent positive reviews, and a broader partner network. Its focus on merchandising, multi-language, and multi-currency support makes it ideal for hotels with diverse markets and complex sales strategies.
Roiback excels in customization, analytics, and personalized support, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing data-driven growth and flexible rate management. Its user-friendly interface and high support ratings favor properties seeking an intuitive, responsive system.
For most hotels looking for proven reliability, ongoing support, and extensive features, Cendyn is the safer, more comprehensive choice. If your hotel values tailored strategies, detailed analytics, and a more personalized touch, Roiback remains a strong contender.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重... 支持团队因其快速有效的帮助而获得一致好评。许多用户注意到,他们的疑问得到了快速解决,并且团队愿意定制并帮助解决技术难题,这对于保持酒店不间断运营至关重要。
许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员... 许多用户都对 Pegasus CRS 及其预订引擎的易用性赞不绝口。界面被描述为用户友好型,允许快速更新规则、费率和限制。酒店经营者指出,它对新员工和经验丰富的员工来说都很直观,可加快入职和日常运营。
动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价... 动态定价功能经常被提及为 Pegasus CRS 的一大优势。酒店经营者强调其能够灵活地快速实施不同的价格计划和促销活动,这有助于迅速响应市场需求并通过更好的定价策略优化收入。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Pegasus 预订引擎提供高水平的定制,使酒店能够将预订流程与品牌保持一致。不过,一些用户建议进一步改进定制选项,特别是关于支付网关和其他增强功能的集成。
虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更... 虽然详细的报告工具受到赞赏,但一些用户认为报告功能可以增强。具体要求包括更多可自定义的报告、更好的深入选项以及改进的整体可用性,以帮助酒店经营者做出更明智的决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn Booking Engine 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 75,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问