The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Passepartout 表现出色 .
Preno 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 160 |
在分析了 160 条经验证的评价后,Passepartout 用户最看重其 ,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Passepartout |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system, your team needs a solution that manages reservations efficiently, supports your operational workflows, and integrates with your existing tools. Passepartout claims to be a comprehensive property management platform, but its zero-star rating and lack of recent reviews cast doubt on its viability. In contrast, Preno boasts over 144 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 overall rating, making it a more credible and trusted option. So, which one truly meets your hotel’s needs?
Passepartout offers a broad suite of features tailored for property managers and landlords, emphasizing AI-driven insights and property performance summaries. However, its overall rating of 0/5 and no recent reviews indicate a significant lack of user validation and ongoing support, raising concerns about its reliability.
Preno focuses on streamlining daily hotel operations with an intuitive interface and a suite of 30+ features, including integrated booking, billing, and channel management. Its recent review activity and high ratings suggest it is actively supported and trusted by hoteliers across multiple regions, making it a more dependable choice.
Both products aim to simplify property management, but Preno’s current user feedback and extensive feature set provide a clearer picture of what your team can expect in real-world use. Are you comfortable choosing a platform with no recent validation, or do you prefer a solution with proven user satisfaction?
If your hotel requires a cloud-based PMS that offers extensive integrations, automation, and ease of use, Preno is the better fit. Its 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews—many recent—demonstrates broad acceptance among hoteliers managing multiple properties, from boutique hotels to motels.
Passepartout might appeal to property managers seeking an AI-driven management system, but with no reviews in the last six months and a 0/5 overall rating, there's little evidence it delivers on these promises. For hotels prioritizing reliability and proven support, Preno is the clear winner.
If your property needs robust channel management, real-time reporting, and guest communication features, Preno’s 17 verified integrations and dedicated modules stand out. Conversely, Passepartout's lack of integration and support diminishes its appeal for modern hotel operations.
Preno’s user interface scores 4.78/5, reflecting high satisfaction with its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers mention that Preno is easy for staff to learn and use, reducing training time and operational disruptions.
Passepartout, with a 0/5 UI rating and no recent reviews, offers no current insights into usability or onboarding quality. Given the lack of validation, it's reasonable to infer it may not be as user-friendly or accessible as Preno.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30+ features, including payment processing, integrated channel management, guest CRM, revenue management, automated reports, and a dedicated housekeeping module—features that Passepartout simply does not provide. Many of these features are designed specifically for hotel operations, emphasizing automation and real-time control.
Passepartout claims to be comprehensive but offers no verified features or recent updates, making its feature set uncertain. Preno’s clear, extensive functionality and proven ability to support daily hotel tasks make it the more capable platform.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews consistently praise its support team, with a 4.8/5 support rating and comments like “service is brilliant” and “support team took us through whatever we couldn’t figure out.” The recent reviews reinforce Preno’s commitment to responsive, helpful assistance.
In contrast, Passepartout’s support rating is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, there’s no validation of its customer service quality. The lack of recent user feedback indicates high uncertainty about support responsiveness.
Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, enhancing its utility for multi-property management. These integrations streamline accounting, channel management, guest feedback, and revenue tracking, adding significant value.
Passepartout reports zero verified integrations, severely limiting its ability to connect with essential hotel tools. For hotels seeking a connected, flexible management system, Preno’s network of integrations is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s overall rating of 4.73/5 from 144 recent reviews reflects strong approval across multiple hotel segments, especially boutique hotels and motels. Many hoteliers highlight its ease of use, support, and feature set as reasons for their high satisfaction.
Passepartout, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no current user feedback, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the available data, Preno clearly maintains higher ratings and trust among users.
Edge: Preno.
Passepartout’s pricing structure is not provided, which may indicate a custom or undisclosed quote model. Meanwhile, Preno charges a flat fee of $800 per month, with no mention of additional implementation or setup costs.
Without transparent pricing for Passepartout, your hotel cannot easily compare value. Preno’s clear fee structure and proven ROI ratings suggest it is a straightforward investment for hotel management.
Preno is a cloud-based hotel management platform with a proven track record, high user ratings, and a broad feature set. Its 17 verified integrations and active support team ensure your operations stay connected and efficient.
Passepartout, despite its claims, lacks recent validation, reviews, and integrations, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven performance. Unless your property specifically needs AI-powered insights and can verify Passepartout’s capabilities, Preno remains the stronger choice.
For hotels prioritizing ease of use, integrations, and support, Preno is the clear recommendation. If your focus is on experimental or AI-centered property management, and you can verify Passepartout’s offerings, it may warrant further investigation—though current data favors Preno.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Passepartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Passepartout 和 Preno 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Passepartout 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Passepartout 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Passepartout:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Passepartout 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问