The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Passepartout 表现出色 .
Semper 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 57 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Passepartout 用户最看重其 ,而 Semper 用户则强调 支持团队, 方便使用的, 培训和易学性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Passepartout |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
方便使用的
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和易学性
▾
|
|
|
+
与 POS 和预订系统集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制和附加功能
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和会计
▾
|
|
|
−
延迟和系统性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 35 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #35 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #40 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #27 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #18 33 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #39 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #34 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #64 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #34 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Passepartout and Semper aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they diverge significantly in market presence, features, and support. Passepartout’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings make it an unreliable option now. Semper, with over 50 recent reviews and a high NPS score, stands out as the more trusted choice. Are you ready to step forward with the more proven platform?
Passepartout, a comprehensive PMS, promises to manage properties efficiently, but with no recent reviews or active user feedback, confidence in its current effectiveness diminishes. Semper, on the other hand, boasts 51 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.33 out of 5, and a 94% likelihood of recommendation—making it a clear leader. While Passepartout claims to streamline property management, Semper’s extensive feature set and modern interface resonate better with hoteliers looking for an integrated solution.
The core difference lies in their market traction and user feedback. Passepartout’s absence of recent reviews makes it hard to evaluate real-time performance, while Semper’s active and recent reviews demonstrate ongoing satisfaction and support. Given the current data, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs today?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, instant support, and a broad feature set, Semper is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface—rated 4.55/5—along with extensive integrations and a responsive support team makes daily operations smoother. Conversely, if your hotel is a small, single-property operation seeking a straightforward, perhaps less modern PMS, Passepartout’s simplicity might seem appealing—though its lack of recent reviews is a concern.
For hotels in need of advanced features such as automated night audits, guest messaging, or integrated payments, Semper’s 94 features surpass Passepartout’s limited offering. Large properties, resorts, and boutique hotels will find Semper’s comprehensive tools essential. Smaller hotels prioritizing minimal complexity might lean toward Passepartout, but the lack of current validation diminishes its appeal.
Semper’s ease-of-use is well-supported, with a 4.55/5 rating, recent positive reviews, and praise for its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users highlight how easily staff adopt Semper, citing straightforward workflows and helpful tutorials. Passepartout, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no current evidence of user-friendliness or support, making it difficult to assess its usability today.
In terms of onboarding and staff adoption, Semper’s high ratings and recent feedback make it the better choice. If ease of use is a priority, this is an unmistakable edge for Semper.
Semper provides 94 features, including direct billing, channel management, advanced reporting, online check-in/out, guest CRM, POS, and more—many of which Passepartout lacks entirely. Passepartout’s feature list isn’t available, but with no verified features or recent active development, its offerings are likely limited compared to Semper’s comprehensive platform.
Semper’s features support a full hotel operation, from reservations to revenue management, offering tools that simplify complex tasks. For hotels needing a robust, all-in-one PMS, Semper’s extensive capabilities clearly outshine Passepartout. Edge: Semper.
Semper’s support team receives high praise, with a 4.88/5 rating and multiple positive reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and knowledgeable assistance. Reviewers specifically mention team members like Bea and Zizipho, whose responsiveness enhances the user experience. Passepartout offers no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge current support quality.
Given the critical importance of support in hotel operations, Semper’s proven high support standards give it a significant edge. If reliable assistance is vital for your team, Semper is the better choice.
Semper integrates with 11 verified partners, including Sage, NightsBridge, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder—covering reservations, channel management, and more. Passepartout currently has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or platforms.
In an increasingly connected hotel tech environment, Semper’s integrations enable smoother workflows and data consistency. Edge: Semper.
With zero recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Passepartout has no current user approval. Semper, rated 4.55/5 based on 51 reviews, enjoys widespread recent praise, especially from hotel segments like luxury, boutique, and resorts. Hotels in these categories appreciate Semper’s ease of use and support.
For property types and segments, Semper’s high ratings and recent reviews make it the more trusted platform. The lack of current feedback on Passepartout suggests it’s not a viable choice today.
Passepartout’s pricing details are unavailable, making it hard to evaluate its value. Semper charges a straightforward $600 per month, with no hidden implementation or setup fees, providing transparent ongoing costs.
Given Semper’s clear pricing and active support, it offers predictable value. The absence of current pricing for Passepartout leaves its cost-benefit analysis uncertain.
However, the lack of recent validation makes Passepartout riskier for current operations.
Semper’s versatility makes it suitable for most mid-sized and large hotels.
Semper offers an actively supported, feature-rich PMS with proven user satisfaction, making it a reliable partner for modern hotels. Passepartout, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, presents an uncertain option that lacks validation in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported system with numerous integrations, Semper is the clear choice. For minimal or basic management needs, Passepartout might seem simpler—though its outdated, unsupported status is a significant concern.
Choose Semper if you want a platform that aligns with current hotel industry standards, supports your growth, and comes with the backing of active users. Passepartout could only be considered if you’re willing to accept potential risks due to its unverified current performance.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Passepartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Passepartout 和 Semper 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 82 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Semper 支持团队因其响应能力、知识和乐于助人而受到高度赞扬。用户对问题的快速解决以及团队的专业和友好态度表示赞赏。特别提到了 Bea、Zizipho 和 Melani 等... Semper 支持团队因其响应能力、知识和乐于助人而受到高度赞扬。用户对问题的快速解决以及团队的专业和友好态度表示赞赏。特别提到了 Bea、Zizipho 和 Melani 等团队成员,强调了卓越的客户服务。
许多评论者称赞 Semper 的界面友好且易于使用,即使是经过最低限度培训的新员工也能轻松上手。直观的日历布局、便捷的导航和简化的工作流程等功能提高了其整体的... 许多评论者称赞 Semper 的界面友好且易于使用,即使是经过最低限度培训的新员工也能轻松上手。直观的日历布局、便捷的导航和简化的工作流程等功能提高了其整体的用户友好性。然而,一些人提到,虽然该系统用户友好,但其视觉设计似乎过时了。
培训和易学性 Semper 受到好评。用户发现该系统的教程和入门支持很有帮助,并且赞赏新员工能够因为其简单性而快速掌握该系统。一些评论建议提供更多的培训机会会... 培训和易学性 Semper 受到好评。用户发现该系统的教程和入门支持很有帮助,并且赞赏新员工能够因为其简单性而快速掌握该系统。一些评论建议提供更多的培训机会会很有帮助。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 Semper 提供的附加功能非常满意,例如开放式餐桌功能、各种盘点选项以及上传客人照片的功能。定制请求包括更具体的报告类别、创建独特报告的功能以及进一... 用户对 Semper 提供的附加功能非常满意,例如开放式餐桌功能、各种盘点选项以及上传客人照片的功能。定制请求包括更具体的报告类别、创建独特报告的功能以及进一步开发某些功能,例如颜色编码和用户分配以解决错误。
Semper 的综合报告和会计功能被强调为酒店管理的宝贵工具。定制报告有助于库存控制、预算和财务监督。用户发现自动响应和多种报告选项对业务运营有益。改进建议... Semper 的综合报告和会计功能被强调为酒店管理的宝贵工具。定制报告有助于库存控制、预算和财务监督。用户发现自动响应和多种报告选项对业务运营有益。改进建议包括更多定制报告类别和改进 Excel 输出。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Passepartout 和 Semper 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Passepartout 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Semper 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Semper 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Passepartout:否。Semper:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Passepartout 的 HT Score 为 0,Semper 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问