The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Passpartout 表现出色 .
Preno 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 160 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 160 |
在分析了 160 条经验证的评价后,Passpartout 用户最看重其 ,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 客户支持, channel management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Passpartout |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing ease of use, features, support, and value. Passpartout offers an AI-driven platform targeting real estate and hospitality, focusing on automation and predictive analytics. Preno emphasizes simplicity and integration, built by hoteliers for hoteliers to streamline daily operations. Both aim to improve management efficiency, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly.
Given the current review data, Preno clearly dominates in user ratings, recent reviews, and overall hotel satisfaction. It’s vital to understand where each product excels or falls short to make an informed choice. Are you ready to compare these solutions side-by-side?
Passpartout and Preno are both designed to solve core hotel management problems like booking, guest communication, and operational oversight. Passpartout’s AI focus aims to automate routine tasks and provide decision-support tools, but it lacks the user reviews and recent feedback that validate its effectiveness for hotels.
Preno, on the other hand, boasts a 4.73/5 rating based on 144 reviews with recent activity, making it more reliable for hotel managers seeking proven, actionable insights. The limited review count and recent absence of reviews for Passpartout cast doubt on its current performance and user satisfaction.
Are you more interested in a platform with proven, current hotel-specific feedback, or exploring a new AI-driven option that still lacks community validation?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly interface, robust integrations, and strong support, Preno is the clear choice. It is best suited for small to medium hotels, boutique properties, and motels that prioritize operational efficiency and guest experience.
If your hotel requires an AI-powered platform that automates complex operations and offers predictive analytics, Passpartout might appeal — but be aware its reviews are nonexistent or outdated, making it less advisable for immediate deployment. For now, Preno’s proven track record makes it the safer option for most hotels.
Preno receives a 4.78/5 ease of use score based on 144 recent reviews, with many users describing it as intuitive, straightforward, and quick to learn. Support is highly rated at 4.8/5, with comments praising its helpful onboarding and responsive service.
Passpartout scores 0/5, indicating no available ratings or reviews on usability, onboarding, or support. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to confirm its ease of use, and the absence of reviews suggests it may not be ready for active hotel management.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 unique features, including payment processing, centralized guest profiles, revenue management, automated night audits, and a native mobile app. Its integrations with Xero, SiteMinder, and other tools streamline operations and financial management.
Passpartout provides no verified features or integrations, focusing instead on AI automation and predictive analytics. Its platform might have potential, but the lack of concrete features and community validation makes Preno the more complete and reliable choice.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support scores 4.8/5, with reviews highlighting quick, friendly, and effective assistance. Hoteliers praise Preno’s proactive communication and ongoing upgrades.
Passpartout has no available support or onboarding ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge the responsiveness or quality of assistance. Given the importance of support in hotel management, Preno’s established support reputation is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, RevControl, TrustYou, and Zingle, covering accounting, channel management, guest communication, and marketing. These integrations facilitate smoother workflows and reduce manual efforts.
Passpartout has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. For hotels relying on a diverse tech stack, Preno’s integrations are a significant benefit.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s 4.73/5 rating stems from 144 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set. Hotels of various sizes, from boutique to motels, consistently recommend Preno for operational improvements.
Passpartout lacks recent reviews and a rating, making it difficult to assess current user satisfaction. Its absence of feedback indicates it’s not yet a trusted or proven solution for active hotels.
Edge: Preno.
Preno charges a flat monthly fee of $800, with no apparent free tier or flexible pricing options. Passpartout’s pricing is not publicly available, and it offers no free trial or detailed fee structure, suggesting it may be more costly or require bespoke negotiations.
Given Preno’s transparent and predictable pricing, it offers better value for hotels seeking budget clarity. The lack of pricing info for Passpartout makes it risky to consider without direct vendor engagement.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers proven, community-supported tools, or if you need immediate, reliable support and features.
Not ideal if your hotel demands highly specialized or legacy systems outside Preno’s current integration portfolio, or if you prefer a low-tech, manual approach.
The core difference lies in their maturity and community validation: Preno is a well-rated, extensively reviewed platform with proven hotel-specific features, while Passpartout remains largely unreviewed and untested in real hotel environments.
If your priority is a reliable, feature-rich system with excellent support, choose Preno for its high ratings, recent reviews, and wide integrations. It’s the safer, more proven choice for most hotels today.
If you are intrigued by AI automation and are willing to experiment, Passpartout may hold potential, but it currently lacks the validation and user feedback that ensure operational stability.
For most hotels looking for certainty and proven results, Preno is the recommended option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Passpartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Passpartout 和 Preno 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Passpartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Passpartout 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Passpartout 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Passpartout:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Passpartout 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问