项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 174 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
roommaster 在支持响应和故障排除帮助方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(4.7/5),并拥有家政以及原生电子邮件营销等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 174 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 8 | 166 |
在分析了 174 条经验证的评价后,Planet 用户最看重其 ,而 roommaster 用户则强调 支持响应和故障排除帮助, 易用性和导航性, 预订管理和前台工作流程。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应和故障排除帮助
▾
|
|
|
+
易用性和导航性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理和前台工作流程
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化和运营效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
云稳定性和系统可靠性
▾
|
|
|
−
Integrations and OTA/channel connectivity
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和定制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #35 4 条评价 | #12 60 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 3 条评价 | #5 85 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #27 0 条评价 | #8 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #15 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #36 2 条评价 | #10 59 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #38 1 条评价 | #17 19 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #10 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #36 0 条评价 | #11 16 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #27 1 条评价 | #8 129 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #17 7 条评价 | #15 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 1 条评价 |
Planet HMS and roommaster HMS target hotel management but diverge sharply in capability, user satisfaction, and operational depth. Planet markets itself as an all-in-one platform integrating PMS, booking engine, and payments, aiming for modern hoteliers seeking a unified system. roommaster HMS, by contrast, offers a comprehensive, established PMS with 69 unique hotel-centric features and a mature ecosystem tailored for operational command centers.
Both products solve the fundamental need to centralize hotel operations—reservations, front desk workflows, payments, and reporting. However, roommaster’s extensive feature set and proven user base across 22 countries position it for hotels requiring detailed operational control and reporting. Planet’s limited feature set and low ratings suggest it fits smaller or less demanding properties, or those prioritizing simplicity over depth.
If your hotel is a small independent or boutique property in North America or Europe requiring proven, detailed PMS workflows with extensive reporting and channel management, roommaster is the data-backed choice. Its 166 reviews averaging 4.4/5 overall and 4.6/5 in the last six months across diverse segments—resorts, city center hotels, boutique properties—demonstrate broad satisfaction in operational reliability and revenue management tools.
If your property is a budget or limited-service hotel in a market where Planet operates (4 countries) and you prioritize a simple, integrated booking and payment experience without complex workflows, Planet may suffice. However, with only 8 reviews averaging 2.2/5, limited feature differentiation, and reported gaps in reporting and support transparency, Planet’s fit is narrower and riskier for hotels needing robust operational control.
Data for luxury hotels is limited for both but slightly favors roommaster with 19 reviews at 4.5/5 versus Planet’s single 0.5/5 review. For mid-sized and larger portfolios, roommaster’s multi-property and financial visibility features make it a safer bet. For properties needing native channel management and revenue intelligence, roommaster’s 69 exclusive features provide concrete advantages.
Planet rates 3.4/5 for ease of use and 2.6/5 for onboarding, based on only 8 reviews. roommaster scores 4.4/5 ease of use and 4.2/5 onboarding from 166 reviews. Despite roommaster’s higher scores, reviewers mention a learning curve and setup complexity, especially for initial configuration and customization.
Planet reviewers praise the clear daily workflow and straightforward check-in/out processes but flag missing automation features like pre-authorization on prepaid OTA reservations and limited filtering/reporting by payment dates. roommaster users note the system’s outdated interface and occasional slow performance but emphasize that once configured, it simplifies reservations, front desk tasks, and reporting.
Both products face usability challenges: Planet’s simplicity comes at the expense of features that automate common front desk tasks; roommaster’s depth requires more training and IT support. Given this, ease of use in daily operations is comparable, with roommaster favored for staff workflows and Planet for straightforward front desk basics.
Edge: Even.
roommaster HMS leads decisively with 69 hotel-specific features Planet does not offer. These include a fully integrated PMS, channel manager, booking engine, point of sale, group booking engine, revenue management, pricing intelligence, housekeeping module, guest CRM, native email marketing, guest communication (SMS), automated night audit, digital registration, and multi-currency support.
These features translate into operational gains: for instance, roommaster’s housekeeping module enables real-time room status updates accessible by both housekeeping and front desk staff, reducing check-in delays. Its revenue management and pricing intelligence modules empower revenue managers with automated rate adjustments and demand forecasting. The integrated POS and gift voucher capabilities support ancillary revenue streams beyond room sales.
Planet HMS, while positioning as an all-in-one system with integrated payments and a mobile-optimized booking engine, does not list unique features beyond the shared core. Reviews indicate missing capabilities such as payment date reporting, automated credit card expiry alerts, and credit card self-entry by guests, which affect daily workflows and guest experience.
Edge: roommaster HMS.
Planet’s customer support scores 2.4/5 with onboarding at 2.6/5 from 8 reviews, while roommaster scores 4.3/5 support and 4.2/5 onboarding from 166 reviews. Despite the rating gap, both products have mixed qualitative feedback that tempers this advantage.
Planet users praise competent, friendly, and thorough assistance with quick resolution, exemplified by a 5-star review highlighting responsive weekend callbacks and clear explanations. However, others criticize poor communication from sales and IT, inconsistent pricing transparency, and delayed responses to emails and calls, leading to operational uncertainty.
roommaster users frequently commend support staff’s patience, technical knowledge, and efficient issue resolution. Several reviewers describe excellent training experiences and timely problem handling during early implementation phases. Yet, multiple reports mention long hold times (25-40 minutes) during peak or off-hours and uneven responsiveness, which can disrupt urgent operations.
Because this mixed feedback exists on both sides and each shows strengths and weaknesses, the support rating edge is neutral.
Edge: Even.
Planet HMS has 196 verified partners, more than triple roommaster’s 60. Both share 34 common integrations including GuestCentric, SHR Group, GuestRevu, Cendyn, TrustYou, and STAAH, which cover critical channel management, guest feedback, and marketing tools.
Planet’s unique partners include Innspire, Right Revenue, Omnibees, and Profitroom, which are strong in revenue management and channel connectivity—valuable for hotels seeking advanced yield management and distribution optimization. roommaster’s unique integrations include Sage (accounting), Inntopia (distribution), M3 (financial reporting), LaaSie.ai (AI-driven guest communication), and Springer-Miller Systems (POS), reflecting a focus on property operations and finance.
Hotels emphasizing revenue management and booking channel sophistication may prefer Planet’s broader marketplace. Properties prioritizing integrated accounting and operational tools will find roommaster’s partners more aligned. Given Planet’s partner count is over 225% that of roommaster, the integration edge favors Planet.
Edge: Planet HMS.
roommaster HMS holds a 4.4/5 overall rating from 166 reviews and 4.6/5 in the last six months across 17 reviews, indicating stable or improving satisfaction. Planet HMS has only 8 reviews with a 2.2/5 average and no last-six-months score due to insufficient volume, limiting confidence in current sentiment.
Segment-specific ratings show roommaster excels in resorts (4.4/5, 76 reviews), city center hotels (4.7/5, 30 reviews), boutique hotels (4.4/5, 62 reviews), and airport/conference hotels (4.6/5, 35 reviews). Planet’s limited data shows mixed scores: vacation rentals and villas at 5/5 (1 review), but luxury hotels and limited service hotels rated as low as 0.5/5 and 1/5 respectively.
roommaster’s strong presence in multiple segments with consistent high ratings and review volume supports its broad market acceptance and proven operational value. Planet’s low volume and mixed scores reflect limited adoption and possible usability or feature gaps.
Edge: Even (due to Planet’s low review count limiting rating reliability).
Planet HMS does not publish pricing or offer trials, nor charges implementation fees or monthly flat or per-room fees publicly. This lack of transparency complicates direct cost comparisons and budgeting.
roommaster HMS publishes a base price of $500 but does not specify monthly fees per room or flat rates, and also lacks a trial option. Its pricing model appears straightforward but requires direct vendor engagement for total cost estimation.
Without complete pricing transparency from either vendor, hotels will need to request detailed quotes and clarify potential hidden costs, especially given Planet’s unclear billing practices noted in reviews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Planet HMS offers a simplified, all-in-one platform with integrated booking and payments focused on straightforward front desk workflows and direct booking optimization. Its limited unique features and modest review scores reflect a tool best suited for small properties or those prioritizing a clean, minimal interface over deep operational control.
roommaster HMS delivers a comprehensive hotel management solution with a broad feature set spanning reservations, housekeeping, revenue management, and reporting. It supports a wide range of hotel types and sizes, proven by 166 reviews averaging 4.4/5 and strong segment ratings across resorts, boutique, and city hotels. Its extensive integrations and operational modules provide the tools needed for complex hotel operations.
Choose Planet HMS if you operate a small property in a region Planet supports and seek a simple, integrated booking and payment system without complex workflows. Choose roommaster HMS if your property demands robust PMS functionality, detailed reporting, multi-role dashboards, and integration with financial and distribution systems, supported by a large, satisfied user base.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户对Roommaster客服团队的评价普遍是耐心、专业且高效,能够快速解决问题,尤其是在紧急运营问题发生时。然而,许多评论也指出,客服等待时间过长、回电缓慢,... 用户对Roommaster客服团队的评价普遍是耐心、专业且高效,能够快速解决问题,尤其是在紧急运营问题发生时。然而,许多评论也指出,客服等待时间过长、回电缓慢,或者难以联系到真人客服,尤其是在繁忙时段或系统故障期间。
许多用户认为 Roommaster 易于使用、界面友好,设置完成后也相对简单。但同时,也有用户提到其界面可能显得过时、反应迟缓或不够直观,这会影响员工的接受度和日... 许多用户认为 Roommaster 易于使用、界面友好,设置完成后也相对简单。但同时,也有用户提到其界面可能显得过时、反应迟缓或不够直观,这会影响员工的接受度和日常工作效率。
评论者经常提到,Roommaster 让预订、入住、退房、接待临时客人、房间调换以及其他相关的前台工作变得更加轻松便捷。许多评论者认为它有助于减少错误,加快日常... 评论者经常提到,Roommaster 让预订、入住、退房、接待临时客人、房间调换以及其他相关的前台工作变得更加轻松便捷。许多评论者认为它有助于减少错误,加快日常运营速度,尤其适合那些希望拥有简单可靠的酒店管理系统 (PMS) 工作流程的酒店。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户赞赏Roommaster云端访问的灵活性,包括远程办公和随时随地管理房产的功能。然而,他们也反映存在系统卡顿、不稳定、更新期间宕机等问题,并担忧云系统宕机时... 用户赞赏Roommaster云端访问的灵活性,包括远程办公和随时随地管理房产的功能。然而,他们也反映存在系统卡顿、不稳定、更新期间宕机等问题,并担忧云系统宕机时会发生什么。
A major theme is how Roommaster connects to booking engines, OTAs, and other systems, which helps hotels keep inventory and bookings synced. But users... A major theme is how Roommaster connects to booking engines, OTAs, and other systems, which helps hotels keep inventory and bookings synced. But users also report lag-related double bookings, compatibility limitations, and a desire for stronger integrations with POS and other hotel tools.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Planet HMS 和 roommaster HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Planet HMS 提供 196 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster HMS 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。roommaster HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 3.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Planet HMS:否。roommaster HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐