The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 399 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
roommaster 表现出色 在 技术支援 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 399 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 246 | 153 |
在分析了 399 条经验证的评价后,RMS 用户最看重其 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining,而 roommaster 用户则强调 技术支援, 预订管理, 用户友好界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
OTA和渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制功能
▾
|
−
系统稳定性
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
可自定义报告
▾
|
|
−
账单和发票
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 124 条评价 | #14 47 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 83 条评价 | #7 66 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #12 6 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 7 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 79 条评价 | #11 46 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #17 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 38 条评价 | #12 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 52 条评价 | #11 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #9 56 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 16 条评价 | #18 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 6 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #13 1 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
When choosing between RMS by RMS and roommaster HMS by roommaster, you’re selecting two platforms designed to streamline hotel operations and improve guest experiences. RMS’s focus is on automation, integration, and real-time insights, while roommaster emphasizes centralized management, customization, and ease of staff workflows. Both promise efficiency, but they diverge significantly in scale, user experience, and feature depth.
RMS’s larger user base, higher review count, and recent reviews give it a slight edge in confidence. However, the decision ultimately hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—are you after a broader, more integrated system or a highly customizable, straightforward PMS?
Both RMS and roommaster aim to simplify hotel management, handling reservations, billing, and guest communication. RMS’s extensive features include integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audits, and multi-lingual capabilities. roommaster, on the other hand, consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and financial management into a single platform with over 270 reports and drag-and-drop workflows.
Where RMS excels is in automation and integration, connecting with more partners and offering features like online check-in, mobile apps, and centralized messaging. roommaster’s strength lies in its simplicity, ease of use, and deep reporting, but some users report instability and limited customization. Do you need a broad, scalable platform or a straightforward solution?
If your hotel requires a flexible, scalable solution with extensive integrations and automation, RMS is the better choice. It supports diverse property types, offers over 112 verified partners, and has a wider global reach—making it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking for advanced features and real-time insights.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, staff training, and cost-effectiveness, roommaster is the way to go. It has more recent reviews, better ratings in customer support, and a strong focus on reservation accuracy and operational simplicity—suitable for small to medium properties seeking reliable core functions.
RMS enjoys a high ease of use rating at 4.3/5, with some users appreciating its extensive onboarding support and customization options. However, certain reviews mention quirks in refunding guests and rate entry, indicating some learning curve. RMS’s interface can be complex due to its feature richness, but staff tend to adapt quickly once trained.
roommaster scores slightly higher at 4.41/5, with many users praising its intuitive drag-and-drop reservation management and straightforward workflows. Customers highlight the platform’s attractive design and ease of training new staff, reducing operational friction.
Edge: roommaster.
RMS offers 17 features unique to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest profiles, automated night audits, and mobile check-in. Its extensive feature set supports larger hotels and chains with advanced automation, multilingual needs, and direct billing.
roommaster presents 12 exclusive features such as rate shopping, spa modules, gift vouchers, native email marketing, and guest SMS communication. Its inbuilt 270+ reports provide deep insights, and its focus on reservation management and financial visibility is notable.
Edge: RMS.
RMS has a higher customer support rating at 4.52/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and effective assistance. Users mention that RMS support can resolve complex issues quickly, making it suitable for hotels needing reliable onboarding and ongoing help.
roommaster scores 4.34/5, with many reviewers appreciating its support team’s responsiveness and helpfulness. Some users mention that support is effective but suggest more frequent user conferences to foster community learning.
Edge: RMS.
RMS claims 112 verified partners, nearly double roommaster’s 56. Shared integrations include major channels like Sage, SiteMinder, and TrustYou. RMS’s broader integration ecosystem helps streamline multi-channel distribution and guest feedback.
roommaster offers a solid set of 56 partners, focusing on OTAs, reporting, and payment integrations. Its compatibility with third-party systems like Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia aids operations but remains narrower than RMS’s extensive partner network.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating is 4.56/5 based on 224 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing its scalability and automation. Hotels in the motel, boutique, and extended-stay segments particularly rate RMS highly for its flexibility and support.
roommaster has a slightly lower overall rating at 4.32/5, with 129 reviews, many praising its reservation management and ease of training staff. However, some reviews cite stability issues and wish for more customization.
Edge: RMS.
RMS charges a flat $700 monthly fee, with no implementation or trial options. Its pricing reflects its feature-rich, large-scale capabilities suitable for bigger properties or chains.
roommaster’s base price is $500 per month, also without trial or implementation fees. Its lower cost makes it accessible for smaller hotels or those seeking core management features without extensive automation.
Not ideal if you seek a simple, out-of-the-box solution or have limited staff tech expertise.
Not ideal if you need extensive integrations or advanced automation features.
RMS stands out with its extensive feature set, higher review volume, and broader integration network, making it well-suited for larger or multi-property hotels. Its real-time insights, automation, and customer support are strong points, but it comes at a higher cost and complexity.
roommaster excels in simplicity, staff training, and affordability. It’s ideal for smaller properties that want an easy-to-use platform with reliable core functions, though it faces limitations in stability and customization.
If your hotel needs a broad, scalable system with rich automation, RMS is the clear choice. For straightforward operations with a focus on staff training and operational consistency, roommaster is the more appropriate option.
This comprehensive comparison should help you confidently decide which platform aligns best with your hotel's needs and growth plans.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RMS 和 roommaster HMS 共享 57 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
技术支持团队的响应速度和专业水平一直备受赞誉,许多用户对问题的快速解决表示满意。然而,一些用户建议在更新前进行更充分的测试,以减少发布后出现的问题。
用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的... 用户称赞 ROOMMASTER 的预订管理便捷,有助于实现流畅的预订流程和直接预订。然而,部分用户反映 OTA 集成存在问题,导致超额预订。增强自动化功能和实现无缝的渠道管理将有助于提升整体效率。
用户称赞该软件的用户界面友好,操作便捷,尤其是在处理预订和交易方面。然而,一些反馈意见建议对某些功能进行改进,例如搜索菜单和运行时变量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多条评论都提到了系统宕机和偶尔出现的不稳定问题。用户建议改进云稳定性,以确保运行稳定,尤其是在预订或更新期间。
虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中... 虽然 ROOMMASTER 提供报表功能,但用户通常觉得报表自定义选项有限,并且希望获得更灵活的筛选功能以及与其他系统的集成。改进的定制报表选项可以提升战略规划中数据的整体利用率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。RMS 和 roommaster HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。RMS 提供 112 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster HMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RMS:否。roommaster HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RMS 的 HT Score 为 86,roommaster 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问