The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 886 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验,而 Resly 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Resly PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational scope and complexity. While both aim to streamline property management, Mews offers a comprehensive platform suited for diverse hotel types, and Resly targets management rights and short-term rentals with a focus on simplicity. Your decision should reflect your property’s size, segment, and future growth plans.
Mews boasts a high user adoption rate, extensive integrations, and a global presence backed by thousands of reviews. In contrast, Resly, being newer and niche-focused, has fewer reviews and a narrower geographic footprint, but may align well with management rights or vacation rental portfolios.
Do you need a full-scale PMS that handles multi-property operations, or a specialized tool for short-term letting? This choice could significantly impact your team’s efficiency and guest experience.
Mews is designed for hotels of all sizes, supporting a broad array of property types, from boutique hotels to large chains. It provides features like automation of reservations, billing, and guest communications, aiming to reduce manual work and elevate service quality.
Resly, by contrast, is built specifically for management rights and short-term holiday letting, focusing on trust accounting and simplifying operational tasks within that niche. It’s a leaner system tailored for property managers who prioritize ease of use over extensive customization.
Given the depth of Mews’ feature set and its focus on operational efficiency, it’s the more versatile choice for hotels seeking to scale or integrate with a wide tech ecosystem. Resly might appeal to management rights firms or vacation rental portfolios that want a straightforward, easy-to-navigate system. Are you looking for a broad hotel PMS or a specialized platform for holiday properties?
If your hotel needs a multi-property management system with robust automation, integrations, and global support, go with Mews. It’s proven to support a wide range of hotel types and sizes, with over 750 reviews and a recent user satisfaction score of 4.62/5, the highest among these options.
If your operations focus on management rights or short-term holiday letting, and you prioritize trust accounting and simplicity, Resly could be suitable. Its niche focus makes it ideal for property managers managing multiple vacation rentals, though its review count and market reach are limited.
For large or growing hotels aiming for scalability and extensive feature customization, Mews is the clear choice. Conversely, Resly works best for small, specialized portfolios seeking streamlined booking and financial management.
Mews scores an impressive 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight the platform’s modern design and flexible workflows, which reduce training time and increase staff adoption.
Resly’s user-friendliness isn’t quantified in ratings, but its niche focus suggests a simplified experience tailored for property managers. However, without extensive reviews, it’s difficult to compare directly.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 45 shared features plus 14 unique functionalities, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency handling, a revenue management module, guest CRM, automated night audit, integrated payment terminals, and employee messaging. This breadth supports complex operations and diverse property types.
Resly, by comparison, has no exclusive features but emphasizes trust accounting and booking management tailored for management rights and short-term rentals. Its core strengths lie in simplifying operational and financial tasks specific to that niche.
Given the extensive feature set and integrations of Mews—over 336 verified partners—it is the more feature-rich option. Resly’s simplicity is an advantage only if your needs are narrowly focused.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support score of 4.27/5, with reviews praising its responsive, 24/7 online support and onboarding assistance. Users note that while occasional bugs appear, they are usually resolved swiftly, minimizing disruption.
Resly’s support ratings aren’t publicly available, but its smaller team and niche focus suggest a more personalized approach. However, the lack of extensive reviews makes it difficult to confirm support quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and payment providers. Its open API and expansive marketplace allow hotels to customize their tech stack with over 1,000 integrations, supporting diverse operational needs.
Resly has only 2 verified partners, focusing primarily on core booking and trust accounting integrations, such as RoomPriceGenie and Goki. Its limited ecosystem may restrict future expansion or customization.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has accumulated 758 reviews, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a recent surge with 98 reviews in the last six months, reflecting strong ongoing user satisfaction. Hoteliers across segments—from boutique to large hotels—commend its flexibility, automation, and support.
Resly, lacking publicly available reviews or ratings, cannot be directly compared. Its niche focus means it might be highly rated within its specific market but lacks broad validation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of implementation, setup, or additional fees. Its cost structure is transparent but might be a significant investment for small properties.
Resly’s pricing details aren’t publicly disclosed, making direct comparisons difficult. Its smaller team and niche focus suggest a potentially lower or flexible fee model, but confirmation is unavailable.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Resly.
Mews stands out as a comprehensive, scalable PMS trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide. Its extensive features, integrations, and recent reviews affirm its capability to support diverse hotel operations and growth ambitions.
Resly, while more limited in scope, excels in streamlining management rights and short-term rentals with an intuitive interface. It’s best suited for property managers who want simplicity and trust accounting without the need for broad customization.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations and scaling efficiently. Opt for Resly if your focus is on managing multiple holiday rentals or management rights with an emphasis on ease and compliance.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency, guest experience, and future-proof their property management, Mews offers a clear, review-backed advantage.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Resly PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 336 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Resly PMS 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Resly PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 99,Resly 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问