The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 191 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.3/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Revinate 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Access and Flexible role based reporting.
基于 HTR 上 191 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 42 | 149 |
在分析了 191 条经验证的评价后,Shiji Group 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 报告和仪表板, 汇总反馈,而 Revinate 用户则强调 声誉管理, 有针对性的电子邮件营销和定制, 系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
声誉管理
▾
|
|
+
报告和仪表板
▾
|
+
有针对性的电子邮件营销和定制
▾
|
|
+
汇总反馈
▾
|
+
系统集成
▾
|
|
+
与第三方软件集成
▾
|
+
客户支持和培训
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
−
电子邮件设计定制
▾
|
|
−
评论回复时间
▾
|
−
电子邮件地址无效检测
▾
|
|
−
价格与价值
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 声誉管理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #19 1 条评价 | #5 19 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 16 条评价 | #5 61 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #6 14 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #4 66 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #4 72 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | #5 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 2 条评价 | #5 10 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #9 2 条评价 | #1 70 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 15 条评价 | #7 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | #3 16 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 9 条评价 | #5 4 条评价 |
Choosing between Shiji Reviewpro Reputation and Revinate (Reputation) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs in reputation management and guest feedback. Both platforms aim to centralize guest reviews and analyze sentiment, but they diverge in their features, user experience, and market reach. With Revinate having significantly more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, it’s clear that more hoteliers trust and prefer Revinate today.
Do you want a platform with a broader reach and more recent feedback? Or are you prioritizing a solution with a longer-established presence? Let’s compare these two reputation management tools head-to-head.
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation and Revinate both gather guest feedback from multiple review sites and social platforms, but they differ in their approach and depth of features. Reviewpro offers a hospitality-specific focus with tools like sentiment analysis and competitor benchmarking, yet it suffers from a lower recent review count and fewer recent user insights.
Revinate, on the other hand, boasts a higher review volume with 116 reviews versus Reviewpro’s 40, and newer reviews in the last six months. This suggests Revinate’s user experience is more current and aligned with ongoing hotel needs. Given the data, Revinate’s stronger recent feedback indicates it might better serve hoteliers looking for modern reputation management solutions.
If your hotel needs a platform that integrates guest feedback into targeted marketing and enhances online reputation with automation, Revinate is the clear choice. Its extensive review aggregation, advanced sentiment analysis, and robust email marketing tools cater well to large, multi-property chains or hotels focused on revenue-driven reputation.
Conversely, if your hotel emphasizes benchmarking against competitors and real-time sentiment analysis from a diversified set of review channels, Shiji Reviewpro could be suitable. It’s more niche-focused but has a narrower user base and less recent activity, making it less appealing for hotels seeking continuous innovation.
For most hotels prioritizing recent reviews, intuitive user experience, and proven track record, Revinate is the recommended option.
Reviewpro shines with a high 4.15/5 ease of use rating, praised for its simple dashboards and minimal onboarding effort. Users commend its straightforward interface, even for teams new to reputation management.
Revinate edges out slightly with a 4.5/5 rating, with reviewers highlighting its user-friendly dashboard, seamless navigation, and quick setup. Hoteliers find both platforms easy, but Revinate’s recent reviews consistently mention faster onboarding and more intuitive features.
Edge: Revinate.
Reviewpro offers 17 features unique to its platform, including AI-generated reply automation, Facebook Messenger integration, and a mobile app, making it appealing for hotels seeking automation and social engagement tools.
Revinate features 27 exclusive functionalities, such as in-app email responses, on-site surveys, sentiment analysis, and advanced segmentation—key for personalized guest engagement and reputation tracking.
While Reviewpro’s features are valuable, Revinate’s broader suite enables more detailed guest insights, automation, and marketing integrations.
Edge: Revinate.
Reviewpro’s customer support ratings sit at 3.69/5, with some users reporting slow responses and difficulty in getting issues resolved promptly. Negative feedback includes complaints about support inconsistency and delays in feature updates.
Revinate scores slightly higher at 3.81/5, with reviews indicating responsive, helpful support and proactive account management. Users appreciate the ongoing assistance and training that help maximize the platform’s potential.
Edge: Revinate.
Revinate boasts 98 verified partners, providing extensive integration options with property management, marketing, and revenue systems. It connects seamlessly with leading PMS like Opera, Maestro, and others, facilitating data flow and automation.
Shiji Reviewpro, with 64 verified partners, covers many core integrations but falls short of Revinate’s breadth. Popular shared partners include SiteMinder and Revinate itself, but Revinate’s wider ecosystem offers more flexibility.
Edge: Revinate.
Revinate’s overall rating of 4.41/5, based on 116 reviews, shows stronger satisfaction, especially among independent and chain hotels. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and impact on revenue.
Reviewpro, with 3.83/5 from 40 reviews, receives mixed feedback. Some users commend its analytics dashboard and data insights, but recent reviews note support and feature limitations.
For recent hotel feedback, Revinate’s higher rating indicates a more favored choice.
Edge: Revinate.
Both platforms are priced similarly: Reviewpro at $900/month and Revinate at $800/month. Neither offers a free tier or trial, and additional implementation fees are absent.
While the pricing is close, Revinate’s better recent reviews, user satisfaction, and broader features suggest it offers more value for similar investment.
Not ideal if your hotel needs rapid onboarding, frequent feature updates, or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel has very limited digital footprint or prefers a more basic reputation management solution.
Revinate stands out with a higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and a broader feature set, making it the preferred choice for hotels seeking active reputation management and guest engagement. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and proven track record support its role as a leader.
Reviewpro offers specialized tools like competitor benchmarking and AI-powered replies, but its limited recent feedback and fewer features make it less compelling for hotels focused on modern, dynamic reputation strategies.
Choose Revinate if you want a well-supported, versatile platform with a proven recent track record. Opt for Reviewpro if your hotel prioritizes competitor insights and social media integrations over recent innovation.
This comprehensive comparison should give your team the clarity needed to finalize your reputation management platform.
声誉管理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 和 Revinate (Reputation) 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 信使集成 | ||
| TripAdvisor 评论收集认证合作伙伴 | ||
| 共享照片 | ||
| 安全数据保护 | ||
| 客人历史 | ||
| 将警报分配给部门 | ||
| 应用内电子邮件回复 | ||
| 灵活的基于角色的报告 | ||
| 短信短信 | ||
| 社会评论跟踪 | ||
| 移动友好 | ||
| 移动访问 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 32 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Our Guest Experience Specialist no longer spends valuable time manually monitoring and responding to feedback across multiple platforms."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该工具的用户界面因其简洁直观而广受好评。用户发现它易于导航,并且只需极少的配置即可使用,因此团队成员均可轻松使用。
许多用户都强调 ReviewPro 仪表板的用户友好性,称赞其全面性和易用性。仪表板提供了有价值的见解,并有助于跟踪关键绩效指标 (KPI),从而有助于做出更好的决策... 许多用户都强调 ReviewPro 仪表板的用户友好性,称赞其全面性和易用性。仪表板提供了有价值的见解,并有助于跟踪关键绩效指标 (KPI),从而有助于做出更好的决策。
用户对 ReviewPro 从多个平台和社交媒体渠道收集客户反馈的能力表示赞赏。这种聚合有助于他们及时了解其在线声誉,并促进有效的运营管理。该工具的集成和同步功... 用户对 ReviewPro 从多个平台和社交媒体渠道收集客户反馈的能力表示赞赏。这种聚合有助于他们及时了解其在线声誉,并促进有效的运营管理。该工具的集成和同步功能增强了其实用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ReviewPro 的客户支持质量好坏参半。虽然一些用户赞赏其快速的响应和主动的功能更新,但其他用户认为粗鲁和缺乏及时的支持是重大问题。
多条评论提到系统处理和显示客户评论回复存在延迟。这种延迟可能会扰乱工作流程并延迟关键的评论管理操作。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该平台的声誉管理工具经常被提及,因为它能够高效地整合来自多个渠道的评论,使酒店能够快速发现和解决问题。一些评论指出,需要改进与评论网站的实时更新同步。
许多评论都称赞 Revinate 的电子邮件营销功能,包括可自定义的模板和个性化活动的细分,这些功能可提高客户参与度和忠诚度。这可以通过追加销售机会和改善客户体... 许多评论都称赞 Revinate 的电子邮件营销功能,包括可自定义的模板和个性化活动的细分,这些功能可提高客户参与度和忠诚度。这可以通过追加销售机会和改善客户体验来提高收入。
虽然该平台通常与 PMS 系统很好地集成,但一些用户报告了挑战并希望有更简化和灵活的集成流程,特别是与外部 CRM 系统或特定的酒店管理软件的集成。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论建议改进电子邮件设计工具的灵活性和功能。增强的自定义选项(尤其是设计和修改活动视觉效果的选项)经常被提及为需要改进的领域。
批评针对的是 Revinate 无法有效地自动检测无效电子邮件地址。这被视为需要改进的领域,以提高活动的效率和准确性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 和 Revinate (Reputation) 共享许多核心 Reputation Management 功能,但各有独特的能力。Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 提供 64 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Revinate (Reputation) 提供 98 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Revinate (Reputation) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation:否。Revinate (Reputation):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Reputation Management 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Shiji Group 的 HT Score 为 32,Revinate 的为 44。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问