RMS vs. Shiji Daylight PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 22, 2026  ·  已分析 356 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 356 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

RMS 表现出色 在 技术支持和学习资源 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.

Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

RMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 356 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
91
75
推荐可能性
86%
90%
易用性
4.3/5
4.6/5
客户支持
4.5/5
4.6/5
性价比
4.1/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $800/mo From $1,200/mo
经验证的评价 322 34

RMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 356 条经验证的评价后,RMS 用户最看重其 技术支持和学习资源, 可扩展性和功能深度, 信托会计支持,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
优点
+ 技术支持和学习资源
+ 易于使用
+ 可扩展性和功能深度
+ 支持团队
+ 信托会计支持
+ 执行
+ 在线渠道管理
+ 培训材料
缺点
预订引擎和移动界面
报告和分析
报告编写者的灵活性
系统速度
POS系统集成
集成能力

RMS 对比 Shiji Group:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
小型(10-24 间客房) #7 147 条评价 #53 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #8 102 条评价 #31 17 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #8 14 条评价 #11 13 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 8 条评价 #22 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
精品酒店 #11 100 条评价 #33 17 条评价
豪华酒店 #13 57 条评价 #24 25 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #9 50 条评价 #22 19 条评价
长住酒店 #3 65 条评价 #45 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
北美 #11 63 条评价 #33 4 条评价
欧洲 #23 20 条评价 #30 8 条评价
亚太 #12 10 条评价 #14 5 条评价
中东 #8 7 条评价 #5 14 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. RMS by RMS and Shiji Daylight PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations but differ significantly in their market presence, feature depth, and user feedback. RMS, with more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, currently holds a stronger position for hoteliers seeking a reliable, feature-rich platform. Which system aligns better with your hotel's needs?

Is RMS by RMS or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Both RMS and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to automate routine tasks, improve guest management, and centralize operations. RMS's strengths lie in its comprehensive feature set tailored to a variety of hotel types, especially RV parks and boutique hotels, while Shiji emphasizes a scalable, cloud-native design ideal for larger chains. RMS's 293 reviews with a 4.56/5 rating and recent positive feedback make it more current and reliable, whereas Shiji’s smaller review pool and lower score suggest a less tested experience. Do you prioritize proven performance or scalable innovation?

RMS by RMS vs Shiji Daylight PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, widely adopted PMS with robust features like integrated booking engines, revenue management, and guest CRM, RMS is the better choice. It suits hotels seeking a trusted platform with a proven track record and extensive regional presence. Conversely, if your hotel requires a cloud-native system with real-time operations, detailed reporting, and seamless integrations for multiple properties, Shiji Daylight PMS offers those capabilities, especially for larger or growing hotel portfolios. For small to mid-sized properties prioritizing tried-and-true solutions, RMS stands out; for large, multi-property chains looking to future-proof operations, Shiji may be preferable.

Is RMS by RMS or Shiji Daylight PMS Easier to Use?

RMS's user reviews frequently praise its intuitive interface, with a 4.28/5 ease-of-use rating based on nearly 300 reviews, and a dedicated onboarding process averaging 4.12/5. Support staff are highly regarded for their responsiveness, though some users wish for more online training resources. Shiji, with a higher ease-of-use score of 4.63/5 from fewer reviews, benefits from its modern design and comprehensive training materials, making onboarding smoother for new users. Edge: Shiji.

Which Has Better Features: RMS or Shiji Group?

RMS offers 16 features unique to its platform, including a booking engine, revenue management, guest profiles, and native email marketing, emphasizing comprehensive guest engagement and operational tools. Shiji Group features 40 exclusive functionalities, such as online check-in/out, automated reminders, integrated payment terminals, and real-time status updates, catering to complex multi-property operations. RMS's features cater well to smaller operations, while Shiji’s extensive toolkit bodes better for large, multi-property hotels. Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has Better Customer Support: RMS or Shiji Group?

RMS's customer support receives an average rating of 4.48/5, with many reviews highlighting its proactive, knowledgeable team and quick resolution times. Users appreciate RMS's support for trust accounting and rapid issue resolution, though some call for more digital training resources. Shiji support scores slightly higher at 4.53/5, with reviewers emphasizing its responsiveness and professionalism, especially during implementation. Both are strong contenders, but RMS’s more recent reviews suggest a slight edge for support quality. Edge: Shiji Group.

Which Has More Integrations: RMS or Shiji Group?

RMS boasts 112 verified partners, including major integrations like Criton, RMS, Sage, and STR, supporting diverse hospitality workflows. Shiji, with 64 verified partners, shares 29 with RMS and offers integrations with Amadeus, Adyen, and Onity, aligning well with large hotel groups. RMS's broader network may provide more flexibility for your existing systems, but Shiji’s extensive integrations with payment and loyalty systems suit larger chains. Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: RMS or Shiji Group?

RMS's recent reviews and high overall rating of 4.56/5, along with an NPS of 8.51/10, reflect broad satisfaction across hotel types, especially boutique and independent hotels. Shiji's ratings are slightly lower at 0/5, but with an NPS of 8.94/10, it garners high praise from larger hotel groups, particularly luxury and conference hotels. RMS’s larger review base and recent positive feedback suggest it’s more favorably viewed overall. Edge: RMS.

How Much Do RMS and Shiji Group Cost?

RMS’s base price is $800/month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees, offering transparent pricing for small to mid-sized hotels. Shiji’s platform costs $1,200/month, reflecting its broader feature set and scalability. Both are subscription-based, with no trial options noted; RMS provides a more affordable entry point for smaller properties.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

  • Hotels that need a feature-rich, scalable system with comprehensive revenue management, booking engine, and guest profiles.
  • Teams that prioritize proven, broad regional support and extensive partner networks.
  • Properties with complex operational needs like RV parks or boutique hotels.
  • Hotels seeking a cost-effective solution with strong automation tools.
  • Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on custom integrations or requires extensive local customization.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Group?

  • Hotels that operate multiple properties and need centralized, real-time management.
  • Large hotel chains seeking a cloud-native, scalable platform.
  • Properties emphasizing automation, detailed reporting, and integrated guest communication.
  • Teams looking for extensive support for online check-in/out and digital guest engagement.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers a standalone system with limited multi-property capabilities or local customization.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS by RMS and Shiji Daylight PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations but serve different segments. RMS’s proven reliability, extensive features, and larger review base make it the safer choice for most hotels, especially smaller or mid-sized properties. Shiji’s cloud-native design and broader integrations appeal to large chains or those planning rapid growth, but its limited recent review volume and lower overall score weaken its current position.

If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-implement system with a solid track record, RMS is the clear leader. It supports a wide variety of property types and scales well with your operations, backed by a high review count and recent positive feedback.

For hotels with complex, multi-property operations seeking a future-proof, highly scalable platform, Shiji offers compelling features. However, its relatively limited recent reviews and slightly lower ratings suggest it may be less tested in current market conditions.

In conclusion, RMS’s higher scores, more recent reviews, and broader user base favor it as the more dependable choice for most hoteliers today.

RMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
Starting Price From $800/mo From $1,200/mo

RMS 有哪些 Shiji Daylight PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 58 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 RMS RMS Shiji Group Shiji Group
任务管理
客人资料
客户关系管理
家政
宾客资料
平板电脑/自助值机
收益管理模块
网上值机
网上结账
销售点
集中用户和角色管理
预订引擎

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 44 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:RMS 对比 Shiji Group(按业务目标)

我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
RMS Lafayette Hotels 中型
+ Over $100K saved annually: eliminated server and IT maintenance costs by moving to RMS.
+ 60+ hours saved weekly: automated accounting and reporting replaced manual entries across the group.
+ 70%+ direct bookings: online direct bookings more than doubled in the four years since switching to RMS.

"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."

Ramsey Lafayette
Ramsey Lafayette
President
Shiji Group Ruby Hotels 中型
+ Successfully went live with 21 hotels across Europe, with additional hotel openings planned in the near future.
+ Equipped with the level of API connectivity they needed to create connections between disparate data sets that would be impossible to achieve manually.
+ Mentions of Technology have increased by 2.5 points, Reception by 3 points and Service by 3.5 points.

"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."

Lucas Höfer
Lucas Höfer
Group Director of Systems and Innovation...
改善宾客体验
RMS The Nare 小型
+ 30% of guests rebook before departure, with staff able to hold preferred rooms and follow up at just the right time.
+ 65% of bookings come from returning guests, with over 20% staying three or more times since 2017, proof that thoughtful personalization fueled by rich guest profiles turns great stays into lasting loyalty.
+ 25 years of guest history, and seven years of detailed booking history were successfully imported during RMS implementation in 2023, a key capability that preserved The Nare

"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."

Toby Ashworth
Toby Ashworth
Managing Director
Shiji Group Sunborn London 小型
+ �s fully integrated tech stack, the team unified their data, simplified workflows, and elevated every touchpoint of the guest journey.
+ From seamless check-in and instant mobile ordering to real-time housekeeping updates, everything now runs faster, smoother, and with less effort.
+ Most importantly, technology now works in the background, freeing up staff to focus on what really matters: delivering memorable, personalized experiences that live up to Sunborn

"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."

V
Vasilis Giannios
Operations Manager, Sunborn London

RMS 对比 Shiji Group:总结

RMS
RMS
4.3/5 来自 322 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

技术支持和学习资源 83% 正面

RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。

可扩展性和功能深度 78% 正面

RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。

信托会计支持 100% 正面

用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

预订引擎和移动界面 67% 负面

预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。

报告编写者的灵活性 75% 负面

尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #8 vs #11
中型(25-74 间客房) #8 vs #31
小型(10-24 间客房) #7 vs #53
超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 vs #22

独特功能

预订引擎 收益管理模块 客户关系管理 客人资料 销售点
4.3/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 112 个集成
查看资料
Shiji Group
Shiji Group
4.5/5 来自 34 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 97% 正面

用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。

支持团队 83% 正面

石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。

执行 83% 正面

一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 62% 负面

尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。

系统速度 57% 负面

与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。

排名更高的方面

青年旅舍 #17 vs #20
AE #3 vs #5
CN #3 vs #5
FR #16 vs #18

独特功能

宾客资料 集中用户和角色管理 任务管理 平板电脑/自助值机 网上值机
4.6/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 64 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RMS 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Shiji Group 4.6 vs 4.3 (+0.4)
性价比 Shiji Group 4.5 vs 4.1 (+0.4)

关于 RMS 与 Shiji Daylight PMS 的常见问题

RMS 能否替代 Shiji Daylight PMS?

这取决于您的需求。RMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。RMS 提供 112 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

RMS 或 Shiji Daylight PMS 是否提供免费方案?

RMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 RMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RMS 的 HT Score 为 91,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息