ROH vs. SiamPay by Asiapay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 69 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

ROH 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.

AsiaPay 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

ROH 与 SiamPay by Asiapay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
0
推荐可能性
99%
0%
易用性
5.0/5
0.0/5
客户支持
5.0/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 From $100/mo Contact sales
经验证的评价 69 0

ROH 与 SiamPay by Asiapay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,ROH 用户最看重其 automation of payments and invoicing, 用户友好的界面, 培训和支持,而 AsiaPay 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

ROH ROH AsiaPay
优点
+ Automation of payments and invoicing
+ 用户友好的界面
+ 培训和支持
+ 实时报告和通知
缺点
集成能力

ROH 对比 AsiaPay:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 ROH ROH AsiaPay
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 13 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #2 21 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 25 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 ROH ROH AsiaPay
精品酒店 #2 31 条评价
豪华酒店 #2 34 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 28 条评价
长住酒店 #3 4 条评价

按区域

细分市场 ROH ROH AsiaPay
北美 #2 61 条评价
欧洲 #3 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing a payments processing software for your hotel involves considering ease of use, feature set, support, and cost. ROH by ROH stands out with its extensive recent review data and high user satisfaction, while AsiaPay by AsiaPay has limited reviews and no recent feedback. Both aim to streamline payments, but your decision should align with your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity.

ROH offers a comprehensive, hotel-focused platform backed by a strong reputation, whereas AsiaPay’s presence is minimal and lacks recent customer insights. Are you ready to prioritize proven, user-rated software over less documented options?

Is ROH or AsiaPay Better for Hotels?

ROH and AsiaPay both serve the hotel industry with payment solutions, yet they diverge sharply in market presence and customer feedback. ROH’s platform is tailored specifically for hospitality, automating invoicing, scheduling, and payments, and it has garnered a solid reputation with 65 reviews and an impressive 4.97/5 customer support rating. AsiaPay, by comparison, has no available reviews or recent user feedback, making its effectiveness and usability uncertain.

ROH’s 10 recent reviews in the last 6 months, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and active use by hotels across various segments. AsiaPay’s lack of reviews means you are relying solely on vendor claims without validation from hotel operators.

Are you comfortable choosing a solution with proven hotel-specific performance backed by recent reviews, or do you prefer to explore a less documented option?

ROH vs AsiaPay: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a payment platform focused on automating billing, refunds, pre-authorizations, and offering features like payment splitting and tokenization, go with ROH. Its extensive feature set—19 unique functionalities—caters to mid- to large-sized hotels looking to optimize revenue flow. For hotels that prioritize reliable customer support, recent positive reviews, and proven operational benefits, ROH is the clear choice.

If your hotel is considering a highly customizable, perhaps broader payment solution without recent hotel-specific feedback, AsiaPay might seem attractive. However, with zero reviews and no demonstrated hotel success stories, it’s difficult to justify over ROH’s proven track record. For most hoteliers seeking confidence backed by recent user experiences, ROH is the safer bet.

Is ROH or AsiaPay Easier to Use?

ROH scores an exceptional 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many users commenting on its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Customers highlight how simple it is to send and receive payments, with minimal training needed—“ROH makes it so EASY!” is a common sentiment. The onboarding process is rated 4.92/5, reinforcing that staff can adopt it rapidly.

In contrast, AsiaPay offers no available usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to gauge how quickly your team can adapt or how straightforward the platform will be for daily operations.

Edge: ROH.

Which Has Better Features: ROH or AsiaPay?

ROH leads with 19 distinct features designed specifically for hospitality, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, recurring payments, and support for multiple card types like Visa, Amex, and Discover. Unique functionalities like installment plans and PCI compliance further enhance its appeal. AsiaPay offers no detailed feature list or hotel-specific functionalities, limiting confidence in its capabilities.

ROH’s feature depth supports complex payment scenarios that hotels encounter regularly, providing more control and flexibility. With no comparable feature set available from AsiaPay, ROH offers a clear advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive payment management.

Edge: ROH.

Which Has Better Customer Support: ROH or AsiaPay?

ROH’s customer support scores an impressive 4.97/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness: “The support staff is great!” and “Initial training was very thorough and helpful.” These high ratings indicate that your team can expect prompt assistance and ongoing service.

AsiaPay offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to assess how well they serve hotel clients. Without verified customer feedback, you risk less reliable support, which can be costly during critical payment or integration issues.

Edge: ROH.

Which Has More Integrations: ROH or AsiaPay?

ROH connects with one verified partner: Oracle Hospitality, with additional integrations in development. AsiaPay also reports one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution. Their shared integration landscape is limited, suggesting both are still expanding their ecosystem.

However, because ROH’s integration with Oracle Hospitality is well-established and often critical for hotel operations, it provides a more reliable foundation for streamlining financial workflows. The lack of broader integrations in both options indicates a focus on core payment functions rather than extensive ecosystem connectivity.

Edge: ROH.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: ROH or AsiaPay?

ROH’s recent reviews show a near-perfect rating of 4.97/5, with 10 reviews from the last 6 months, indicating current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and independent properties, appreciate its ease of use and support, with comments like “It makes my job so much easier.”

AsiaPay has no available reviews, so no current hotel ratings or feedback are accessible. Without recent ratings, it’s impossible to determine how well it performs or is perceived in the field.

Edge: ROH.

How Much Do ROH and AsiaPay Cost?

ROH is priced at a flat fee of $100 per month, with no free tier, trial, implementation fees, or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting straightforward. Meanwhile, AsiaPay’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to compare value or assess potential costs.

Given the clarity of ROH’s pricing and its proven value (rated 4.84/5 for ROI), it provides a predictable investment for hotels seeking reliable payment processing.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ROH?

  • Hotels that need a reliable, hotel-specific payments platform to streamline invoicing and collections.
  • Teams handling high volumes of guest payments, requiring automation and real-time reporting.
  • Hotels seeking features like refunds, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and recurring billing.
  • Hotels aiming to improve cash flow with efficient, automated payment processes.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Has minimal payment needs with simple transactions.
  • Prefers a platform with limited features or is in early-stage development.
  • Does not require extensive customer support or integration with major hotel systems.

What Type of Hotel Should Use AsiaPay?

  • Hotels exploring multiple payment options without critical need for hotel-specific features.
  • Hotels in regions where AsiaPay has established partnerships or local support.
  • Hotels seeking a customizable or broad international payment gateway.

Not ideal if your hotel:

  • Requires proven, hotel-specific payment automation.
  • Needs robust customer support backed by recent reviews.
  • Desires a platform with extensive features tailored for hospitality.

ROH vs. AsiaPay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

ROH’s core advantage is its proven track record, extensive recent reviews, and dedicated hospitality features. Its high satisfaction ratings and active user base make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.

If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and a feature-rich platform backed by recent hotel feedback, ROH is the clear winner. Its transparent pricing and focused support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking to improve cash flow and operational efficiency.

Conversely, AsiaPay’s limited data and absence of recent reviews suggest it’s a less certain option. Without proven hotel-specific success stories or recent customer validation, it’s better suited for hotels in regions or markets where local support is more critical, or for those willing to take a risk on less documented solutions.

In summary, if you want a payments platform with verified performance, active hotel users, and ongoing support, choose ROH. For hotels valuing flexibility and regional presence over proven hotel-specific features, AsiaPay might be worth exploring—but with caution.

ROH 和 SiamPay by Asiapay 的价格是多少?

支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

ROH ROH AsiaPay
Starting Price From $100/mo

ROH 有哪些 SiamPay by Asiapay 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ROH 和 SiamPay by Asiapay 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 ROH ROH AsiaPay
付款拆分
定期付款
退款管理
部分捕获
链接支付
预授权

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:ROH 对比 AsiaPay(按业务目标)

我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
ROH Le Méridien St. Louis Clayton, a Marriott Hotel, Managed by Coury Hospitality 小型
+ Within days of launch, the property centralized all group bookings in ROH, giving the GM real-time visibility into deposit status and clear ownership across teams that eliminated the guesswork while accelerating follow-up.
+ With ROHbot automating invoice creation and delivery, sales is now collecting payments earlier and more consistently, improving both guest payment experience and cash flow.
+ In the first 60 days, the property was able to recover 90% of outstanding invoices and now maintains a consistently low aging AR balance month-over-month.

"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."

Matt Korsos
Matt Korsos
General Manager
AsiaPay

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ROH 对比 AsiaPay:总结

ROH
ROH
5.0/5 来自 69 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Automation of payments and invoicing 100% 正面

Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.

用户友好的界面 100% 正面

ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。

培训和支持 100% 正面

用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成能力 60% 负面

虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。

独特功能

退款管理 预授权 付款拆分 链接支付 部分捕获
5.0/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
AsiaPay
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 ROH 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
客户支持 ROH 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 ROH 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 ROH 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)

关于 ROH 与 SiamPay by Asiapay 的常见问题

ROH 能否替代 SiamPay by Asiapay?

这取决于您的需求。ROH 和 SiamPay by Asiapay 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。ROH 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SiamPay by Asiapay 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

ROH 或 SiamPay by Asiapay 是否提供免费方案?

ROH:否。SiamPay by Asiapay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 ROH 和 SiamPay by Asiapay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ROH 的 HT Score 为 100,AsiaPay 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息