The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #13 1 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 33 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #12 3 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 0 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 11 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #15 3 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 34 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 24 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 37 条评价 | #12 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #34 0 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #17 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Runtriz by Runtriz and Zaplox Premium Guest App hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and guest engagement priorities. Both products aim to enhance the guest experience through mobile and contactless solutions, but they differ significantly in scale, features, and recent user feedback. Runtriz, with its extensive global presence and higher review volume, offers a more comprehensive engagement platform, while Zaplox focuses primarily on contactless check-in and streamlined communication.
Your decision should consider the level of sophistication you require, the integration capabilities, and the specific hotel segment you serve. Are you looking for a broad, feature-rich platform or a targeted contactless solution?
Runtriz excels in delivering a multi-faceted guest engagement system, supporting features like multilingual functionalities, in-room controls, loyalty integration, and digital hotel compendiums. Its platform is designed for a wide range of property types, including luxury, resorts, and casinos, with over 2,500 properties served globally. The reviews emphasize its ease of communication and revenue-driving features, but some users cite challenges with PMS and mobile key integration.
Zaplox, on the other hand, specializes in contactless check-in, mobile keys, and guest communication, primarily targeting hotels seeking to minimize physical contact and streamline operations. Its user-friendly interface and focus on contactless experiences are praised, but it has a more limited feature set, and some reviews mention ongoing issues with full PMS integration, notably with Opera.
While Runtriz offers a more extensive feature set and higher review count (37 reviews, all recent), Zaplox’s simpler, contactless focus appeals to hotels prioritizing health safety and operational efficiency. Do you need a broad engagement platform or a streamlined contactless solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest engagement platform that enhances communication, drives revenue through upselling, and offers multi-language support, Runtriz is the better choice. Its broad feature set enables rich guest interactions, bookings, and loyalty programs, making it ideal for larger resorts, luxury hotels, or properties wanting an all-in-one solution.
If your primary goal is to deliver a contactless, mobile-first experience with quick check-in, mobile keys, and minimal staff interaction, Zaplox should be your pick. It is well-suited for boutique or city-center hotels that prioritize health safety and operational simplicity. For properties seeking to reduce front desk staffing and offer a seamless mobile journey, Zaplox delivers targeted value.
Ultimately, choose Runtriz if you value a full engagement ecosystem. Opt for Zaplox if your focus is contactless convenience with straightforward implementation.
Runtriz’s user interface has a high usability score of 4.66/5, praised for its straightforward deployment and guest-friendly communication features. Its onboarding process is rated 4.23/5, with reviews highlighting its simple setup and staff acceptance, though some mention interface aesthetics could improve.
Zaplox scores lower on ease of use at 3.33/5, with reviews noting a generally intuitive app but acknowledging some challenges with full PMS integration and certain functionalities. Its onboarding experience is rated 4/5, and customer feedback emphasizes the importance of ease for staff and guests.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz offers 10 shared features with Zaplox, including guest messaging, mobile pay, and multi-property solutions. It also boasts two unique features: multilingual support and a web-app interface, enhancing its versatility for diverse markets.
Zaplox provides five exclusive features—keyless entry, remote check-in, notifications, mobile app, and integrations with concierge and room services—making it ideal for contactless operations. While Zaplox’s features focus on streamlined guest entry and communication, Runtriz’s broader suite supports end-to-end guest engagement.
Edge: Runtriz, with its larger feature set and multi-language support.
Runtriz has a slightly higher customer support rating at 4.51/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and ease of communication. Users mention that the platform’s support team is proactive and helpful, although some note room for improvement in integration assistance.
Zaplox scores 4/5, with reviews praising the responsiveness and availability of support. Guests and hoteliers appreciate the quick problem resolution, though some mention that full PMS integration remains a challenge, affecting overall support satisfaction.
Edge: Runtriz.
Runtriz supports 14 verified partners, including major systems like Ariane, Guestware, and Amadeus. It shares seven partners with Zaplox, such as SALTO, Oracle Hospitality, and Vingcard, but also offers integrations with systems like OpenKey and Cendyn, supporting a broad tech ecosystem.
Zaplox has 17 verified partners, including Stayntouch, Mews, and Protel, providing extensive integration options. Despite this, some integrations, especially with PMS like Opera, are still evolving, impacting full automation.
Edge: Zaplox.
Runtriz’s overall rating of 4.77/5 reflects strong satisfaction across segments, especially with boutique, resort, and branded hotels. Its recent reviews praise its ease of communication, guest engagement tools, and revenue features, making it a trusted choice for a broad range of properties.
Zaplox’s rating of 3.33/5 is lower, with some highly satisfied boutique and city-center hotel users but more mixed feedback from independent properties. Recent reviews indicate appreciation for contactless features but highlight integration challenges.
Edge: Runtriz.
Pricing for both products is not publicly disclosed, with no free tiers or trial options available. Implementation fees and monthly per-room charges are also not specified, requiring direct vendor contact for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Runtriz offers a broad, feature-rich platform with a high user satisfaction rating, suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest engagement ecosystem. Its extensive integrations, multilingual support, and proven global presence make it ideal for large and diverse properties.
Zaplox provides a focused, contactless guest journey with easy mobile check-in, keys, and communication. It is best for properties prioritizing health safety, operational simplicity, and quick deployment, especially smaller boutique or city hotels.
If your hotel needs a complete engagement system, Runtriz is the clear choice. For a streamlined, safety-first contactless experience, Zaplox is the better fit.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Runtriz 因其能够促进酒店员工与客人之间轻松高效的沟通而受到称赞。它支持到达前通知、实时消息和服务请求,从而提高客人满意度和运营效率。
总体而言,该平台对员工和客人来说都十分友好且直观。不过,一些用户指出,界面可以更加现代化和更具视觉吸引力,这表明在审美方面还有待改进。
该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些... 该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Runtriz 允许高度自定义设置模板和自动响应,用户发现这对简化操作和增强客户互动大有裨益。但是,建议改进这些功能的后端支持。
有些客人误解了入住前流程,以为这意味着他们已经完全入住,从而导致混乱和不满。更清晰的沟通和指示可以缓解这些问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Runtriz 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Runtriz 提供 14 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Premium Guest App 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Runtriz 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Runtriz:否。Zaplox Premium Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Runtriz 的 HT Score 为 21,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问