The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 71 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Zaplox 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 71 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 4 |
在分析了 71 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Zaplox 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #12 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Zaplox Premium Guest App hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both products aim to elevate guest engagement and streamline operations, but they approach these goals differently. Crave offers a comprehensive, app-less mobile solution with extensive features, while Zaplox emphasizes contactless, branded experiences with a focus on safety and simplicity. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Crave’s robust feature set and broader market presence give it a significant edge, but Zaplox’s contactless focus could be more appealing for safety-conscious properties. Can your hotel leverage these differences effectively?
Crave’s platform is designed to keep your guests engaged across the entire property, providing access to a wide array of services via their mobile devices without requiring downloads. Zaplox, on the other hand, centers on contactless check-in, mobile keys, and streamlined communication, all wrapped in a branded app for safety and personal touch.
While Crave’s system supports in-venue ordering, digital menus, and multi-lingual capabilities, Zaplox emphasizes contactless check-in, mobile key issuance, and guest messaging. Both products improve operational efficiency, but Crave’s extensive feature list and broader international presence make it more adaptable for diverse hotel types. Which solution fits your hotel’s operational style and safety concerns?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich guest engagement platform capable of supporting complex operations, go with Crave. Its extensive feature set, including in-venue ordering, NFC, and multi-language support, suits properties looking for comprehensive digital service automation.
If your hotel prioritizes contactless check-in, mobile keys, and safety-focused guest communication, Zaplox is the clear choice. Its core strengths lie in enabling seamless, touchless journeys that cater to safety-conscious travelers and hotels aiming to reduce staff interactions.
For hotels seeking a wide-ranging platform with proven global reach and highly recent positive reviews, Crave’s stronger reputation makes it the safer pick. Conversely, if your focus is on contactless technology and streamlined guest communication, Zaplox’s specialized approach is compelling.
Crave scores a high 4.61 out of 5 for ease of use, backed by a review count of 48 and recent positive feedback. Users praise its intuitive interface, efficient onboarding, and helpful customer support, with comments like, “The user interface was super customizable but looked amazing,” and “Customer service was exceptional.”
Zaplox trails with a 3.33 rating, based on only three reviews, with feedback indicating it’s “easy to use for guests,” but some users mention room for improvement in user interface consistency and app management. The limited review pool makes it harder to gauge real-world usability confidently.
Edge: Crave.
Crave offers 18 unique features, including web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue ordering, NFC, and extensive payment integrations. Its capabilities extend to multi-menu ordering, contactless ordering, and POS integration, supporting complex service automation.
Zaplox provides eight features, focusing on core contactless functions such as mobile check-in, mobile keys, guest profiles, and digital compendiums. It also offers mobile promotions and messaging, but lacks the extensive service automation found in Crave.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s customer support scores a remarkable 4.79 out of 5, with reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and proactive approach, even during late hours. Hoteliers appreciate the “incredible response times” and “great support team,” which significantly reduces operational headaches.
Zaplox scores a solid 4 out of 5, with reviews highlighting “quick responses” and “good communication,” though with fewer recent reviews, it's harder to gauge current support levels. Both products deliver strong support, but Crave’s more recent feedback confirms its leadership.
Edge: Crave.
Both systems integrate with 17 verified partners, including common integrations with Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Adyen. Crave has additional integrations with Interel, Book4Time, and Quore, supporting a broader range of hotel management and operational systems.
Zaplox’s unique integrations include Stayntouch, SALTO Systems, and Mews, emphasizing property management and access control. While both are extensive, Crave’s broader partner network offers more flexibility for complex hotel ecosystems.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s overall rating is 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback indicating high satisfaction levels, especially among luxury and branded hotels. Hotels value its extensive features, ease of use, and support, rating it highly across segments with a 93% likelihood to recommend.
Zaplox’s few reviews (3 total) show a mixed picture, with hotel ratings around 3.33/5. Boutique and city center hotels appreciate its simplicity, but standalone reviews mention limitations with integration and user experience.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no apparent additional implementation or monthly costs. It is marketed as a paid solution without freemium options, focusing on value for money through extensive features.
Zaplox does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests it may be customized based on hotel size and needs. Both products lack transparent trial information, so inquire directly for precise quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal service automation needs or prefers a simple, branded app focused on contactless check-in.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive in-venue ordering, multi-language support, or complex service automation.
Crave’s platform is a comprehensive digital guest engagement solution with a broad feature set, higher user ratings, and a larger global presence. It is well-suited for hotels seeking deep automation, integration flexibility, and an in-depth guest experience.
Zaplox excels at providing a contactless, branded guest journey with core features like mobile check-in and digital keys, making it ideal for safety-focused properties and hotels looking for quick, straightforward solutions.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported platform, Crave is the stronger choice. For properties emphasizing safety, contactless check-in, and simplicity, Zaplox offers a focused, effective option.
This comparison provides a clear, data-backed overview to help you decide which guest app aligns best with your property’s operational and guest experience goals.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 通知 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Premium Guest App 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Zaplox Premium Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问