The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 60 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Shift4 Payments 表现出色 .
Zil Money 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
基于 HTR 上 60 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 58 |
在分析了 60 条经验证的评价后,Shift4 Payments 用户最看重其 ,而 Zil Money 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 增强客户体验, 付款处理速度。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
增强客户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
付款处理速度
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
第三方集成
▾
|
|
|
−
审批流程
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 2 条评价 | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 1 条评价 | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Shift4 Payments and Zil Money hinges on your hotel’s specific payment processing needs. Shift4, despite its longstanding presence, lacks recent reviews and a strong user base, raising questions about its current reliability and support. Zil Money, with 54 reviews in the last six months and a high user rating, offers a more current and trusted solution. Both aim to facilitate financial transactions, but their approaches and reviews tell a different story. Do you prioritize a solutions provider with proven recent performance or one with a broader feature set and active user feedback?
Zil Money is the clear choice for hotels needing reliable, well-reviewed payment management software. Its high review volume and recent positive feedback make it a safer option. Shift4 Payments, with only 2 reviews and no recent feedback, appears less dependable and less supported today. If your hotel is evaluating based on current user experiences, Zil Money stands out.
Both Shift4 Payments and Zil Money address financial transactions but differ significantly in their maturity and user trust. Shift4 is a comprehensive enterprise payment solution built for omnichannel use, supporting online, POS, and contactless payments, and integrating with numerous hospitality software providers. Conversely, Zil Money offers a broad array of financial tools including invoicing, expense tracking, and multiple payment methods, with a strong emphasis on ease of use and international transactions.
Despite Shift4’s extensive feature list and integrations, it suffers from a lack of recent reviews and poor customer support ratings, with a 1/5 score and a recurring theme of dissatisfaction. Zil Money, however, boasts 54 reviews, all within the last six months, with an 8.57/5 NPS score and 87% likelihood to recommend, indicating widespread satisfaction.
Are you seeking a tried-and-true platform with active user feedback, or are you willing to gamble on an enterprise solution with limited recent validation?
Your choice depends heavily on your hotel’s size, complexity, and priorities. If your hotel needs a broad, enterprise-grade payment system that integrates with existing property management software and supports multiple channels, Shift4’s extensive network and PCI compliance may appeal. It’s suited for large hotels or chains that require sophisticated transaction security and detailed reporting.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick setup, and recent positive reviews, Zil Money is the better fit. It excels in ease of use, offers numerous payment options—including virtual cards, ACH, wire transfers, and international payments—and has a proven track record with hotels of various sizes. For hotels that prioritize current support and straightforward financial management, Zil Money is the clear leader.
In short:
Ease of use is critical for swift staff adoption and hassle-free onboarding. Shift4’s UI scores a 3/5, indicating a moderate learning curve, with some reviews citing difficulties during setup and support issues. Its onboarding process, rated 2/5, suggests that your team might face delays or confusion when implementing the system.
Zil Money, with a 4.5/5 ease of use rating and a 4.16/5 onboarding score, receives praise for its intuitive interface and smooth setup. Users describe it as “simple to use,” with fast onboarding that reduces operational disruption. Given the recent reviews and high support scores, Zil Money’s user experience is better suited for hotels seeking quick results.
Edge: Zil Money.
Shift4 Payments offers a comprehensive payment platform with features like real-time authorization, fraud controls, gift card solutions, and PCI compliance, but it does not have unique features in the source data. Conversely, Zil Money provides 15 distinct features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, American Express, Visa, and payment splitting.
While Shift4’s features cater to broad enterprise needs, Zil Money’s specialized features—especially its support for contactless payments and multiple currencies—offer more practical flexibility for hotels managing diverse payment channels.
Edge: Zil Money.
Customer support can make or break your experience. Shift4’s support rating is a dismal 1/5, with reviews mentioning neglect and unfulfilled promises, including ongoing billing issues after contract cancellations. Customers describe their support as “not caring about the product or finishing promises.”
In stark contrast, Zil Money scores 4.5/5 for support, with reviews highlighting reliable, responsive service. Users say, “Customer support is prompt and helpful,” and appreciate the overall support experience. For hotels needing reassurance that help is available, Zil Money’s support quality makes it the better choice.
Edge: Zil Money.
Integration breadth is key to seamless operations. Shift4 Payments connects with 10 verified partners, including popular property management and booking systems like WebRezPro, RoomKey PMS, and CMS Hospitality. These integrations support a variety of hospitality-specific workflows.
Zil Money, however, has no listed verified partners, indicating limited integration capabilities out of the box. This could restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with existing systems, potentially increasing manual work or requiring custom development.
Edge: Shift4 Payments.
User reviews reveal a stark contrast. Shift4 has only 2 reviews, both negative, citing poor support and unfulfilled promises, with a 0/5 overall rating and no recent feedback. Its lack of recent reviews signals limited current user trust or activity.
Zil Money, with 54 reviews in the last six months, boasts a 62.92/100 overall score, a 4.5/5 ease of use score, and an 8.57/5 NPS. Hotels across varied segments praise its reliability and customer service, making it the more trusted platform today.
Edge: Zil Money.
Pricing models are notably different. Shift4 does not publicly list pricing, implying custom quotes based on volume and needs, which often suggests higher costs typical for enterprise solutions. Zil Money charges a fixed $400 setup fee with no mention of ongoing subscription costs, but detailed pricing info is available online.
Since Shift4’s pricing is opaque and designed for larger enterprises, smaller hotels may find Zil Money’s transparent, straightforward fee structure more appealing.
The core difference lies in their maturity and support. Shift4 provides a comprehensive, enterprise-focused payment solution with broad integrations but suffers from limited recent reviews and support issues. Zil Money, on the other hand, offers a simple, highly-rated platform with active feedback, making it more reliable for hotels today.
Choose Shift4 if your hotel is large, complex, and needs extensive integration and security features. Opt for Zil Money if you value recent positive experiences, ease of use, and flexible payment options without the complexity of enterprise systems.
In conclusion, Zil Money’s current user satisfaction and active review presence make it the safer, more dependable choice for most hotels. Shift4’s enterprise scope might appeal to large chains but is hampered today by support and validation issues.
This comprehensive comparison guides your hotel in making an informed, confident decision based on current user data, feature sets, and support quality.
支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Shift4 (DOLLARS ON THE NET) 和 Zil Money 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种结算 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| 小费功能 | ||
| 授权调整 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 链接支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Shift4 (DOLLARS ON THE NET) 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Shift4 (DOLLARS ON THE NET) 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Shift4 (DOLLARS ON THE NET):否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Shift4 Payments 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问