The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Sirvoy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Travel Tripper 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 105 | 0 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Sirvoy 用户最看重其 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理,而 Travel Tripper 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
|
−
性价比
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 36 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 3 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #46 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #27 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #29 21 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #37 7 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #42 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #35 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #13 6 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #27 0 条评价 | — |
As a hotelier evaluating property management systems, you want an intuitive, reliable, and supported platform. Sirvoy has amassed a significant volume of recent reviews and high ratings, making it the standout choice here. Meanwhile, Travel Tripper’s lack of user feedback and absence of reviews place it at a disadvantage for your decision-making. With more recent feedback and proven user satisfaction, Sirvoy clearly takes the lead.
Sirvoy offers a comprehensive, easy-to-use PMS tailored for small to medium-sized properties, with over 95 reviews and a high NPS score of 9.41/10. Travel Tripper, on the other hand, lacks any reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. If your hotel prioritizes proven customer satisfaction, Sirvoy is the clear winner.
Sirvoy addresses core hotel needs like reservations, channel management, guest communication, and payment processing—all within an accessible interface. Travel Tripper, by contrast, seems to focus primarily on distribution and revenue management, with no publicly available user feedback to confirm its ease of use or feature set. For hotels seeking an all-in-one PMS with a track record, Sirvoy’s more extensive feature set and customer praise make it superior.
If your hotel requires a user-friendly system with strong support and a broad feature set, go with Sirvoy. It caters well to small and medium properties, especially those needing integrated booking engines, channel management, and guest communication tools. If your hotel’s focus is solely on distribution and revenue optimization, Travel Tripper might be relevant, but the lack of reviews makes it hard to justify over Sirvoy’s proven track record.
Sirvoy’s UI scores an impressive 4.64/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and simple onboarding. Conversely, Travel Tripper has no available ratings or user feedback, making its ease of use unverified. Support ratings also favor Sirvoy, which boasts a 4.85/5 score and praise for quick, helpful assistance. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 distinct features, including multi-lingual support, a booking engine, guest messaging, payment processing, and a housekeeping module—features that Travel Tripper does not publicly list or verify. Travel Tripper’s focus appears centered on revenue management and distribution, with no documented standalone features. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support earns a 4.85/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful, and friendly assistance. There are no reviews or ratings for Travel Tripper’s support, making it impossible to gauge service quality. Given Sirvoy’s high support scores and recent positive feedback, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, providing extensive connectivity. Travel Tripper has no verified integrations publicly listed or reviewed. For a hotel looking to connect with multiple distribution channels, Sirvoy’s integration ecosystem is clearly advantageous. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 94% likelihood to recommend and a 9.41/10 NPS score, especially favored by small and boutique hotels, hostels, and inns. Travel Tripper has no reviews, so no ratings or hotel segment preferences are available. The clear winner here is Sirvoy due to its proven high ratings. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy charges a $200 monthly flat fee, with no freemium or trial options. Travel Tripper’s pricing is not publicly available, which complicates comparison. Based on transparency and value, Sirvoy’s predictable pricing offers clear value for the features provided.
Not ideal if your property demands highly specialized or enterprise-level features, or if you prefer free or usage-based models.
Not ideal if you require a proven, well-reviewed PMS with broad customer support and integrations, or if your hotel is small and needs a simple, cost-effective system.
Sirvoy’s main strength lies in its proven track record, with over 95 recent reviews, high ratings, and a broad feature set. It functions as a full property management system that supports daily operations, reservations, and guest communication for small to medium-sized hotels. Travel Tripper offers distribution and revenue management tools, but the absence of verified reviews makes its performance uncertain.
Choose Sirvoy if you desire a user-friendly, well-supported PMS with a strong reputation. Opt for Travel Tripper only if your primary need is distribution and rate management, and you are prepared to evaluate its capabilities without concrete customer feedback. Overall, Sirvoy’s established presence and recent positive reviews make it the safer, more dependable choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Travel Tripper | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Sirvoy 和 Travel Tripper 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Travel Tripper |
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Sirvoy 和 Travel Tripper 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Sirvoy 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Travel Tripper 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Sirvoy:否。Travel Tripper:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Sirvoy 的 HT Score 为 85,Travel Tripper 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问