The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,347 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
−
移动和云集成
▾
|
−
性价比
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Sirvoy requires evaluating how each system addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Cloudbeds is a comprehensive platform that combines property management, channel management, and revenue tools, designed to serve ambitious properties seeking growth. Sirvoy, on the other hand, is an easier-to-use, budget-friendly solution aimed at small to medium-sized accommodation providers.
Both products aim to streamline your workflows, but Cloudbeds offers more extensive features and integrations, especially for larger or rapidly expanding properties. Do you prioritize a fully integrated experience with advanced tools, or is simplicity and affordability more important for your current stage?
Cloudbeds and Sirvoy both aim to simplify hotel operations and improve guest management, but they diverge significantly in scope. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform with 21 features exclusive to its system, including revenue management, digital registration, and extensive integrations, while Sirvoy provides core property management, booking, and channel management features with a straightforward interface.
Cloudbeds’s reviews highlight its ability to connect operations, distribution, and revenue strategies effectively, with a 4.63/5 overall rating based on over 1,000 reviews, mostly recent. Sirvoy’s user base is smaller, with around 95 reviews, and it’s rated at 83.93, but it boasts a higher customer support score of 4.85/5. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions and technological complexity?
If your hotel is a boutique property, hostel, or a small operation prioritizing ease of use and budget, Sirvoy’s simple interface, competitive price of $200/month, and excellent support make it a suitable choice. It’s especially handy if your team needs straightforward reservation and channel management without complex revenue tools.
Conversely, if your hotel is aiming to scale, innovate, and optimize revenue, Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—such as revenue management, automated night audits, and a mobile app—justifies its $600/month cost. Its 190 verified partners and global reach also support larger or multi-property operations seeking advanced integrations.
In summary, choose Sirvoy for basic, cost-effective management; opt for Cloudbeds if you need a full-fledged platform that drives growth and efficiency.
Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, with Cloudbeds at 4.61/5 and Sirvoy at 4.64/5. Cloudbeds’s onboarding score of 4.45/5 reflects its user-friendly interface, and many reviews praise its intuitive design for reservation workflows and daily operations.
Sirvoy’s support and setup are consistently described as excellent, with a focus on simplicity for new users. Users note that Sirvoy’s straightforward interface and dedicated support make onboarding smooth, especially for smaller teams unfamiliar with complex PMS systems.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Cloudbeds clearly offers more features, with 43 shared plus 21 exclusive functionalities, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, and ancillary revenue tools. It also includes modules like digital registration, guest apps, shift planning, and spa/wellness management—features that Sirvoy does not provide.
Sirvoy focuses on core reservation and channel management, with limited extras, mainly handling booking, payment, and basic guest management. For hotels seeking advanced revenue tools, automation, and operational control, Cloudbeds is the superior choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support rating is 4.41/5, with reviews mentioning responsive, helpful support but also some comments about setup complexity. Support responsiveness is generally good, especially during onboarding, but some users note that advanced customization can require support assistance.
Sirvoy outperforms with a 4.85/5 rating, with reviewers describing their support as “excellent,” “quick,” and “thorough.” Many users praise the prompt and friendly assistance, making it ideal for small teams or properties new to PMS systems.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major platforms like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and TripAdvisor, along with exclusive integrations such as EPoS, revenue management, and digital registration. Its extensive marketplace supports scalable, customized setups.
Sirvoy has 21 verified integrations, primarily with major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, plus GDS and TripAdvisor. While sufficient for basic needs, it offers fewer options for advanced or niche integrations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63/5 reflects broad satisfaction, especially among larger properties and those seeking growth tools. Recent reviews praise its ability to streamline operations, increase bookings, and support complex workflows.
Sirvoy’s rating of 83.93/100 is strong among small accommodation providers, with many recent support reviews praising its simplicity and affordability. Hoteliers with basic needs and limited budgets tend to rate Sirvoy highly but generally do not rate it on advanced features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges $600/month, with no free trial or freemium option. It offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features, making it more expensive but more comprehensive.
Sirvoy costs $200/month, with a 30-day trial. Its lower price appeals to small properties with limited budgets, but some users note that costs can increase as they add more channels or features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive hotel management system designed for ambitious properties ready to scale. Its extensive features and integrations support growth, revenue optimization, and operational efficiency, making it ideal for larger or expanding hotels.
Sirvoy excels as a straightforward, cost-effective solution suited for small properties and hostels that need simple reservation and channel management. Its intuitive interface and high support ratings provide peace of mind for teams new to PMS software.
If your hotel aims to grow, automate, and maximize revenue, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If affordability and ease of use are your priorities, Sirvoy is the practical option.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问