The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 36 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 3 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #46 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #27 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #29 21 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #37 7 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #42 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #35 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #13 6 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #27 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and growth plans. Sirvoy and Uplisting both address core functions like reservation management and channel connectivity; however, Sirvoy's more comprehensive feature set and recent review momentum make it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers. Uplisting, while specialized for short-term rentals, lacks recent reviews and wider user feedback, raising questions about its maturity for traditional hotel properties. So, which system will truly serve your hotel's long-term success?
Both Sirvoy and Uplisting aim to simplify property management, but Sirvoy’s broad feature set and established presence set it apart. Sirvoy’s extensive integrations (21 verified partners) and multi-lingual, multi-currency capabilities cater well to diverse hotel operations. Uplisting, primarily built for short-term rental hosts, has only two verified integrations and does not currently serve the hotel segment directly.
Sirvoy’s high user ratings—4.64/5 for ease of use and 4.85/5 for support—are backed by 95 reviews, with 32 in the last six months. Uplisting’s zero reviews make it difficult to evaluate its reliability or user satisfaction. Does your hotel need a mature, well-supported PMS with proven results? If yes, Sirvoy’s recent reviews and established reputation favor it over Uplisting.
If your hotel operates in traditional hospitality segments—such as boutique hotels, B&Bs, or city center accommodations—go with Sirvoy. Its 95 reviews and recent positive feedback demonstrate proven stability and customer support. Uplisting’s focus on short-term rentals and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable unless you manage exclusively vacation rentals or similar properties.
Conversely, if your team is a short-term rental operator seeking automation tools for guest communication, guest review insights, and maintenance scheduling, Uplisting’s AI-driven features could be appealing. But without verified reviews, it’s risky to rely on Uplisting for critical operations. For most hotels, Sirvoy’s depth and reliability are the safer investment.
Sirvoy’s user interface has earned a 4.64/5 ease of use rating, praised for its intuitive design and straightforward workflows. New users frequently comment on how easy it is to onboard and navigate, with support staff providing timely help when needed. Its onboarding score of 4.6/5 further confirms its gentle learning curve.
Uplisting, however, does not currently have publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or learning curve. Given Sirvoy’s proven track record of simplicity, edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy offers 43 unique features, including multi-lingual support, a channel manager, booking engine, guest messaging, automated reminders, integrated payment processing, and more. Its features cover essential hotel operations and extend into marketing with native email and gift vouchers, providing a one-stop solution.
Uplisting has no listed features or enhancements in the available data. While it may offer essential short-term rental tools, it lacks the breadth of features that Sirvoy provides for traditional hotels. The clear edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support rating is 4.85/5, based on recent reviews from 95 users, with many praising its responsiveness and helpful staff. Hoteliers highlight quick problem resolution and clear communication, often describing support as a key strength.
Uplisting’s support details are unavailable, with no recent reviews to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Without verified customer support ratings, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s 21 verified partners include major players like SiteMinder, TrustYou, Cloudbeds, and others, offering broad connectivity for channel management, guest communication, and revenue tools. It supports integrations with booking engines, payment providers, and marketing tools, making it adaptable to diverse hotel setups.
Uplisting lists only two verified partners, including PriceLabs, which limits its integration scope. For hotels seeking flexibility and extensive third-party support, Sirvoy’s richer integration ecosystem is the clear advantage. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s recent reviews consistently praise its ease of use, support, and value, with a 94% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes and segments—especially small to medium properties—find it reliable and straightforward, with user ratings supporting its positive reputation.
Uplisting has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Until more feedback emerges, Sirvoy’s established reputation and recent review volume make it the higher-rated choice. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial beyond a 30-day trial period. Its straightforward pricing makes it transparent for hotels planning their budgets.
Uplisting’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison. Given Sirvoy’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers clearer cost predictability for your hotel.
Sirvoy’s comprehensive feature set, recent positive reviews, and extensive integrations position it as the most reliable solution for most hotels. Its ease of use and support reputation make it suitable for small to medium-sized properties aiming for streamlined operations and guest satisfaction.
Uplisting, while potentially strong for short-term rental hosts, lacks recent user feedback and a broad hotel focus, making it less suitable for traditional hospitality providers. Unless your property exclusively handles short-term rentals and you prioritize automation, Sirvoy is the safer, more proven option.
In conclusion, for your hotel’s current needs and future growth, Sirvoy’s established track record and rich feature set make it the clear choice. Uplisting remains untested in the hotel space and should be considered only if your operations fit its niche profile.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Sirvoy 和 Uplisting 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Sirvoy 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Uplisting 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Sirvoy:否。Uplisting:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Sirvoy 的 HT Score 为 85,Uplisting 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问