The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 36 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 3 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #46 1 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #27 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #29 21 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #37 7 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #42 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #35 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #23 16 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #13 6 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #27 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Sirvoy and VIPS PMS boils down to your hotel’s size, feature needs, and budget constraints. Sirvoy, with its more comprehensive customer feedback and broader global presence, offers an easier route for small to medium-sized properties seeking an intuitive, well-supported system. VIPS, on the other hand, provides a modular platform that might appeal to larger or more technically inclined teams, but its lack of recent reviews and limited regions make it less proven in the field. Which system best fits your property’s growth plans and operational complexity?
Sirvoy’s significantly higher review count, recent positive feedback, and high ratings for ease of use and support make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hoteliers. VIPS, while theoretically offering a broader feature set, lacks current user reviews and regional presence, making it harder to assess its real-world performance. The data clearly favors Sirvoy as the more trusted property management system for today’s hoteliers.
Both Sirvoy and VIPS PMS aim to streamline hotel operations but approach it differently. Sirvoy delivers a straightforward, cloud-based property management system tailored mainly to small and medium properties with emphasis on ease of use, customer support, and affordability. VIPS offers a feature-rich, modular platform designed to cater to diverse operational needs, including advanced revenue management and integrated CRS, but it has zero recent reviews or proven global presence. The critical question: which aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions?
Sirvoy excels in core reservation, channel management, and guest communication, making it ideal for hoteliers prioritizing simplicity and reliable support. VIPS’s extensive features are appealing for hotels seeking more comprehensive management capabilities but lack recent validation. Does your team need a proven, user-friendly system with strong support, or are you seeking a customizable platform that may require more setup and internal resources?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement system that emphasizes customer support, Sirvoy is the clear choice. With a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating, over 95 reviews, and a 94% likelihood to recommend, Sirvoy is well-suited for small to medium properties, B&Bs, or hostels. Its affordable $200 starting price and recent positive feedback make it ideal for hoteliers who prioritize reliability and cost-effectiveness.
VIPS might appeal if your hotel has complex needs, such as revenue management, digital check-ins, or an integrated CRS. However, the absence of recent reviews and limited regional coverage—primarily in Europe—raise concerns about its current performance and support. If you’re prepared for potential implementation challenges and want a flexible, feature-rich system, VIPS could be an option, but the lack of recent user validation is a significant risk.
Sirvoy’s UI has a 4.64/5 rating and is praised for its intuitive, straightforward design, making onboarding and daily use simple, even for those new to hotel management. Customers consistently highlight the ease of navigation, quick support, and minimal training requirements, with many reviews emphasizing how fast they got up and running.
VIPS, lacking recent reviews, offers a modular system with multiple features, but there's no current data on its user experience or onboarding process. Its broader feature set might entail a steeper learning curve, especially without recent user feedback. Based on the latest data, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy provides 37 shared features, including essential reservation management, channel integration, payment processing, and mobile compatibility. It offers unique functionalities like multi-currency support, guest messaging, integrated ID scanners, and online checkout, features VIPS does not currently provide.
VIPS offers 8 features exclusive to its platform, such as automated night audits, digital registration, lobby kiosks, revenue management, and EPoS, which are not available in Sirvoy. However, VIPS’s broader feature list is unverified in recent user experiences, making Sirvoy’s proven core feature set more reliable. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy boasts a 4.85/5 customer support rating based on recent reviews, with many users praising its quick, helpful, and friendly assistance. Multiple reviews describe their support as “the best I’ve encountered,” emphasizing rapid responses and clear communication.
VIPS has no recent reviews or detailed customer support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Without current feedback, the safe choice remains Sirvoy, whose support team consistently receives high praise. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and Booking.com, as well as solutions like TrustYou, Revinate, and Cloudbeds. Its extensive partner network supports smooth operations and connectivity across various platforms.
VIPS has 11 verified integrations, including popular partners such as RoomPriceGenie and RoomChecking. While its integration count is smaller, the lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm how well these integrations perform in practice today. Based on available data, Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s recent reviews (32 in the last 6 months) consistently highlight its ease of use, excellent support, and affordability, leading to a 94% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.41/5. Its overall rating of 83.9/100 cements its reputation among small to medium properties.
VIPS, with no recent reviews, offers no current data on property satisfaction. Its lack of recent validation makes it impossible to compare user ratings. For now, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the clear preferred choice. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy charges a flat $200 monthly fee with no implementation or setup costs, and it offers a 30-day free trial, making it accessible for small to medium properties. VIPS’s pricing starts at $800, with no free trial or detailed breakdown, indicating a significantly higher investment without clear evidence of added value or performance.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, detailed CRM, or complex customization features beyond basic operations. Larger hotels or those requiring high-level integrations may find Sirvoy’s offerings limiting.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, values quick deployment, or prefers proven, well-supported systems with recent user validation. Limited regional presence and lack of recent reviews suggest caution for new adopters.
Sirvoy’s core strength lies in its simplicity, proven user satisfaction, and high-quality support, making it ideal for small to medium hotels prioritizing ease of use and reliable service. Its extensive integrations and competitive pricing further support this position, especially given the recent positive feedback.
VIPS offers a broader array of features for hotels with complex needs, particularly revenue management and self-service check-ins, but the absence of recent reviews and limited regional coverage introduce uncertainty. Unless your hotel requires these advanced features and your team is prepared for a more involved implementation, Sirvoy remains the safer, more validated choice.
For most small to medium-sized properties, Sirvoy’s combination of ease, support, and proven performance makes it the recommended PMS. VIPS might be suitable for larger or tech-savvy teams seeking a highly customizable system, but its lack of recent validation makes it a more risky option in today’s market.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Sirvoy 和 VIPS PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Sirvoy 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VIPS PMS 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Sirvoy:否。VIPS PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Sirvoy 的 HT Score 为 85,VIPS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问