The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Urway |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #3 2 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 21 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 25 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Urway |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 31 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 34 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 28 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Urway |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 61 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between ROH by ROH and Urway by Urway hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Both aim to handle transactions efficiently, but only ROH demonstrates a proven track record of extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and a broad feature set. ROH’s superior ratings and active reputation position it as the more reliable choice for most hotels. Are you ready to see how these platforms compare across key aspects?
ROH and Urway both address the core challenge of streamlining hotel payments, but they diverge significantly in maturity and user feedback. ROH, launched in 2023, holds a high average rating of 0/5 but boasts 65 reviews, including 10 recent ones, with a 99% likelihood to recommend. In contrast, Urway has no reviews or recent data, which makes assessing its reliability difficult. Given the extensive and recent reviews for ROH, it provides clearer insights into performance.
ROH’s strengths lie in its ease of use, support, and feature depth, while Urway’s lack of review data raises questions about its market presence and user satisfaction. With no reviews or ratings available for Urway, it’s hard to gauge its real-world performance. For hotel operators prioritizing proven solutions, ROH’s active review base makes it the more dependable candidate. Do you want a system backed by community validation, or are you willing to explore untested options?
If your hotel needs a payments platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction, go with ROH. Its client base includes luxury and resort hotels, and it offers advanced features like refunds, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and support for Apple Pay and Google Pay. Additionally, its $100 monthly flat fee and robust integration options make it a compelling choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency.
If, however, your hotel is open to exploring a newer or less established platform, and you prioritize a vendor without reviews or proven track record, Urway might be worth considering. But keep in mind, without review data, there’s no assurance of performance or customer support. For most hotels, especially those who value reliability and proven results, ROH remains the recommended choice.
ROH’s ease of use is reflected in its impressive 4.95/5 rating, with users describing it as “amazing” and “very user friendly,” noting how easily both staff and clients can navigate the platform. Its onboarding process scores 4.92/5, and recent reviews highlight smooth implementation and high satisfaction with support staff. Users also appreciate the ability to schedule future correspondence, saving time during busy periods.
Urway, on the other hand, provides no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. The absence of feedback on its interface suggests uncertainty about its user-friendliness or adoption ease. Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 unique features tailored specifically for hospitality payments, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link, installment plans, and support for Visa, American Express, Discover, Mastercard, and Diners Club. These functionalities give your team the flexibility to handle complex payment scenarios and improve cash flow management.
Urway provides no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities, making it impossible to evaluate its capabilities relative to ROH. Without a clear feature set, ROH’s extensive offerings give it a decisive edge for hotels seeking comprehensive payment management. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s support scores a near-perfect 4.97/5, with reviews praising the support team as “great” and “helpful,” especially during onboarding. Its support system is designed to ensure smooth implementation and ongoing assistance, which is critical for hotels integrating new payment processes.
Urway’s customer support ratings and reviews are unavailable, raising concerns about its responsiveness and reliability. In the absence of user feedback or support metrics, ROH’s proven support infrastructure clearly outperforms. Edge: ROH.
Both ROH and Urway have verified integrations with one partner each—ROH with Oracle Hospitality and Urway with Yanolja Cloud Solution. While the number of integrations is limited, ROH’s partnership with Oracle Hospitality, a major global PMS provider, could facilitate smoother operational workflows for many hotels.
Urway’s integration with Yanolja Cloud, a leading platform in Asia, suggests potential regional strength but lacks further details. Given the limited number of integrations for both, ROH’s strategic partnerships offer a slight edge, especially for hotels already using Oracle systems. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s 65 reviews, including 10 recent ones, demonstrate strong user satisfaction, with a 99% likelihood to recommend and a 4.97/5 support rating. Its user base includes luxury, resort, and boutique hotels, which often rate it highly for ease of use and features.
Urway has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it’s safer to assume ROH’s proven satisfaction levels outweigh Urway’s unknown reputation. Edge: ROH.
ROH charges a straightforward $100/month flat fee, with no implementation, setup, or additional monthly charges, offering predictable pricing. Meanwhile, Urway’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears they do not provide a transparent pricing model publicly.
Without clear pricing information from Urway, ROH’s transparent, predictable costs make it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly. This clarity favors ROH for hotels seeking straightforward financial planning. Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a less mature or unreviewed platform, or if you require regional coverage outside ROH’s active markets.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a platform with extensive user feedback, proven reliability, or detailed feature sets.
ROH and Urway are both payment processing options, but only ROH’s extensive review history, recent positive feedback, and feature depth make it a clear winner. ROH’s established presence in multiple regions and high support ratings demonstrate its readiness to serve hotels effectively.
Choose ROH if your hotel values proven results, comprehensive features, and reliable support. Its $100 monthly fee and strong integration options provide a straightforward path to streamlined payments.
Opt for Urway only if your hotel is open to testing a less proven solution and values regional partnerships or specific unlisted features. Given the current lack of reviews and transparency, Urway remains a riskier option for most hotels seeking dependable payment infrastructure.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。
用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ROH 和 Urway 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。ROH 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Urway 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ROH:否。Urway:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ROH 的 HT Score 为 100,Urway 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问