The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Call center functionality and Geotargeted pricing module.
Xotels 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 28 | 0 |
在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,Vertical Booking 用户最看重其 客户服务, 渠道管理, 无缝集成,而 Xotels 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
无缝集成
▾
|
|
|
+
评价购物
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
方便使用的
▾
|
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
集成问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 11 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 13 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 5 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #9 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 17 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Vertical Booking and Xotels for your hotel reservations system hinges on what your property needs most. Both aim to streamline booking and distribution, but Vertical Booking offers a comprehensive, integrated CRS with a proven track record, while Xotels functions more as a consultancy with a reservation system tailored for independent hotels. Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize a plug-and-play reservation platform or specialized revenue management expertise.
Vertical Booking’s extensive feature set and high review volume give it a clear edge over Xotels in overall confidence and recent performance data. But are you better off with a system that has more proven integrations and a broader market presence? Let’s compare the two.
Vertical Booking is a cloud-based CRS designed to handle large-scale multi-channel distribution, offering built-in features like a customizable booking engine, OTA rate comparison, and call center support. Xotels, by contrast, primarily functions as a consultancy specializing in revenue management and hotel turnaround, with the CRS being just one part of its service suite.
Vertical Booking’s 27 reviews in the last six months and 4.61/5 overall rating highlight its recent user satisfaction and active market presence. Xotels, with no recent reviews or general rating, lacks the fresh data needed for confidence. Do you want a system with current, detailed user feedback or one more oriented toward strategic consulting? Vertical Booking’s recent reviews and high NPS score suggest it’s the more reliable choice.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, cloud-based reservation platform with broad integrations, Vertical Booking is the clear pick. Its support for over 69 verified partners, including OTAs, PMS, and GDS, makes it suitable for properties seeking extensive distribution and automation.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires specialized revenue management consulting and is less concerned about integrated CRS features, Xotels might be better suited. However, with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, its value in comparison to Vertical Booking remains uncertain. For hotels focused on reservations and distribution, Vertical Booking’s active user base and feature set are more relevant.
Vertical Booking scores 4.41/5 for ease of use, with reviews describing it as user-friendly and straightforward to manage, especially after onboarding. Users highlight fast support and intuitive interfaces, although some mention occasional issues with session management and a desire for a more modern booking engine layout.
Xotels, lacking recent reviews or detailed feedback, provides no comparable data on usability. Given the active reviews and high usability rating for Vertical Booking, it’s fair to conclude that it offers a more accessible experience.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking offers 8 features exclusive to its platform, including call center functionality, geotargeted pricing, support for weekly and monthly rates, dynamic pricing, availability management, cancellation policies, booking rules, and TMC management. These features support comprehensive rate control and distribution flexibility, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational control.
Xotels does not list any unique platform features, focusing instead on consulting services and revenue management tools outside the CRS. Without comparable in-system features, Vertical Booking’s feature depth clearly outperforms Xotels in reservation platform capabilities.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking boasts a 4.5/5 customer support rating, with reviews describing their support as "quick," "responsive," and "helpful," particularly in resolving issues promptly. Some reviews mention support delays due to time zone challenges, but overall, the sentiment is positive, especially for existing clients.
Xotels provides no recent, detailed reviews of customer support, making it impossible to evaluate. Given Vertical Booking’s high review count and consistent praise, it’s the more dependable choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking integrates with 69 verified partners, including major PMS, OTAs, and other distribution channels, with notable shared integrations like Mews and Hotelchamp. This extensive network supports seamless multi-channel management and automation.
Xotels has only 6 verified partners, with minimal shared integrations, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels requiring broad, reliable integrations and automation, Vertical Booking’s expansive partner list is clearly advantageous.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s 27 recent reviews in the last six months contribute to a high overall rating of 4.61/5, with a 92% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, resorts—appreciate its user-friendliness, support, and feature set.
Xotels, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no data on user perception. The recent active feedback for Vertical Booking makes it the more trusted solution among hoteliers.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s pricing model is not publicly disclosed, but no trial or freemium options exist. Similarly, Xotels does not list specific costs or pricing models, focusing instead on consulting services.
Without transparent pricing, your decision hinges on value perception and scope. Given Vertical Booking’s extensive features and active support, it likely offers a more tangible return on investment for reservation management.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, minimal system without extensive features or if you need a dedicated revenue management consultancy.
Not ideal if you want an all-in-one reservation platform or rapid technological deployment without consulting support.
Vertical Booking offers a feature-rich, well-supported reservation platform with extensive integrations, proven recent reviews, and high user satisfaction. Its broad market presence and active customer base make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational control and automation.
Xotels, while strong in revenue management consulting, lacks recent user feedback or a modern, integrated CRS. For hotels prioritizing a ready-to-use reservation system with proven usability, Vertical Booking is the clear pick.
If you require a full reservation system with ongoing support and broad integrations, Vertical Booking is the recommended choice. Conversely, if your hotel needs strategic consulting primarily for revenue growth, Xotels offers expertise, but with less emphasis on the reservation platform itself.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Vertical Booking (CRS) 和 Xotels (CRS) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 动态定价 | ||
| 取消政策 | ||
| 可用性管理 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 地理定位定价模块 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然许多用户称赞 Vertical Booking 的客户服务的响应能力和解决问题的有效性,但一些评论指出,其速度和一致性方面需要改进,特别是针对美国市场。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和可用性。
许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平... 许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平台而言。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Vertical Booking 经常被描述为用户友好且直观,让酒店员工无需经过大量培训即可轻松管理预订和房价。尽管如此,一些用户仍提到某些功能可以更直观和更简化。
该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大... 该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Vertical Booking (CRS) 和 Xotels (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Vertical Booking (CRS) 提供 69 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Xotels (CRS) 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Vertical Booking (CRS):否。Xotels (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Vertical Booking 的 HT Score 为 29,Xotels 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案